Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
#695834 01/03/22 04:58 AM
User Showcase
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,786
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,786
Ok, so I'm probably breaking some rule of PG's by posting this here, but I can't think of any other forum of theirs to place this. I just feel very strongly that reworking existing songs is the most fun to be had with BBox (and educating from an arranging standpoint), and if you ask me the rules should either be changed to accommodate, or they provide us with a forum for this very concept. So here you go (for however long till this gets taken down):

Just Called

There's only one BBox instrument, a Jazz Guitar "Solo-Accompaniment", rest is me.


Just because you can, doesn't mean you should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BBox 2022 Audiophile, Mac Pro Intel, OSX 10.6.8, 800x600 (TV VGA)
User Showcase
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,373
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,373
Your playing is outstanding. Great tone, pitch, expression... love the sound of the horn & flute. All it needs is a bass and brush kit...


Bandcamp
Soundcloud
Win-11; BiaB-2025 Audiophile
Cakewalk; Melodyne-5; Scaler 2; NI Komplete:
Focusrite Scarlett 18i20



User Showcase
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,786
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,786
I suppose what any given arrangement "needs" is a matter of taste, and I will say the very minimalistic choice here is very much a deliberate one. I also wanted to test just how effectively this designated "solo-accompaniment" RT (emphasis on the prefix!) could really fill out a given piece of music on its own.

Thanks for the feedback.


Just because you can, doesn't mean you should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BBox 2022 Audiophile, Mac Pro Intel, OSX 10.6.8, 800x600 (TV VGA)
User Showcase
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,509
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,509
Originally Posted By: Icelander
Ok, so I'm probably breaking some rule of PG's by posting this here

It's at the top of the forum, in the "Forum Rules" section:

The songs must be originals, no copyrighted or "cover" songs. You must have all of the rights to the songs.

Originally Posted By: Icelander
I just feel very strongly that reworking existing songs is the most fun to be had with BBox (and educating from an arranging standpoint), and if you ask me the rules should either be changed to accommodate, or they provide us with a forum for this very concept.

The rules are in place because of copyright.

If you don't have the rights to a song, you don't have the legal right make a version of the song, and PG Music doesn't have the right to host that song - no matter how much fun you had in the process of making it.

"I Just Called To Say I Loved You" was written in 1984, so it won't be until at least 2054 before it gets into the public domain - perhaps even longer as copyright seems to be extended indefinitely.


-- David Cuny
My virtual singer development blog

Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?
User Showcase
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,786
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,786
Originally Posted By: dcuny
Originally Posted By: Icelander
Ok, so I'm probably breaking some rule of PG's by posting this here

The rules are in place because of copyright.

If you don't have the rights to a song, you don't have the legal right make a version of the song, and PG Music doesn't have the right to host that song.
Doesn't seem to stop the guys at youtube, but fair enuff. It's not like I'm about to argue when this gets taken down or anything (which I sort of expected anyway).

At least I finally made something again...


Just because you can, doesn't mean you should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BBox 2022 Audiophile, Mac Pro Intel, OSX 10.6.8, 800x600 (TV VGA)
User Showcase
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,509
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,509
Originally Posted By: Icelander

At least I finally made something again...

Yep! laugh


-- David Cuny
My virtual singer development blog

Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?
User Showcase
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,951
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 7,951
Cool tune.


Scott Collingwood
https://soundcloud.com/scottt709
https://soundcloud.com/spiritlevel-ca
https://www.youtube.com/@SpiritLevel-ge3hm/
User Showcase
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,786
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,786
Originally Posted By: Scott C
Cool tune.
You know what, I actually always felt that, despite its tremendous popularity, this was the lamest & most bland song Wonder ever made! crazy
That's rather why I wanted to see if it couldn't be spruced up a bit.... only to be then informed I completely picked the wrong venue to present the result, but there it still is.


Just because you can, doesn't mean you should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BBox 2022 Audiophile, Mac Pro Intel, OSX 10.6.8, 800x600 (TV VGA)
User Showcase
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,692
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2015
Posts: 2,692
There is no such thing as an “international copyright” that
will automatically protect an author’s writings throughout
the world. Protection against unauthorized use in a particular
country depends on the national laws of that country.

Having said that Iceland has an agreement with the United States.

Iceland · Berne (Paris) Sept. 7, 1947; UCC
Geneva Dec. 18, 1956; WTO Jan. 1, 1995

However unlikely it is that you will suffer any negative consequences for Copywrite infringement, it is certainly possible. The penalties can be quite severe and are occasionally enforced.

Website owners also have some legal liability for illegal content posted on their site although laws concerning these issues are often contested.

You can however easily obtain permission to do a cover song. It is not free but only cost around $15.00 US in most cases.

Many of us, both owners of copywrites, and users of copyrighted material are not happy with the current laws but they are on the books and need to be complied with however frustrating they may be.

I am not trying to tell you what you should do but just informing you of the possible consequences of your actions. I am not a music attorney and this is not legal advice.

Cheers,

Billy


“Amazing! I’ll be working with Jaco Pastorius, Charlie Parker, Art Tatum, and Buddy Rich, and you’re telling me it’s not that great of a gig?
“Well…” Saint Peter, hesitated, “God’s got this girlfriend who thinks she can sing…”
User Showcase
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,786
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 4,786
Originally Posted By: Planobilly

I am not trying to tell you what you should do...
Thing is, I as just a general user can't delete this thread by now even if I wanted to. I genuinely expected it to have been taken down by the moderators straight away, but it's been almost two days now and it's still up. Given the site's rules, I'm as surprised about that as anyone.


Just because you can, doesn't mean you should!
----------------------------------------------------------------------
BBox 2022 Audiophile, Mac Pro Intel, OSX 10.6.8, 800x600 (TV VGA)
User Showcase
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,689
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,689
Quote:
Thing is, I as just a general user can't delete this thread by now even if I wanted to.

Well, if you really want to, you can flag it for the mods to delete, and they will. Or just self-censor the naughty URL.

Anyway, just to mention something I regard as problematic:

The forum rules don't just prohibit copyright violations. They say, "You are allowed to post links to your own original songs." (emphasis added)

This, of course, not only disallows copyright violations but use of public domain material as well, so strictly speaking I am a violator for linking to a "cover" of Beethoven's violin concerto.

They also don't provide for the use of licensed copyrighted material, so even if I went to the trouble of getting the right to make a cover of this Stevie Wonder song I still wouldn't be allowed to post it here, under existing rules.

Regarding the PD issue, I (and I assume anyone else) just goes "eh, they didn't mean that" and ignores the rule as they break it. Never a great state of affairs for a rule you want people to take seriously.

And regarding the licensing issue, what incentive do I have to pay $15 to license my cover if the rules say that's still not allowed? (BTW, has anyone actually done that, licensed a song specifically to be able to post it here, and specified this in their post?)

SUMMARY OF SUGGESTION:

Amend the forum rule to explicitly allow use of public domain and licensed copyrighted material.

Thinking about it, I can almost guarantee this will result in more people paying that fee to do just that, which will be a good thing, yes? I personally have never had the slightest idea how to license a song. If it's really just $15, hey, I'll probably do it.

AUXILIARY SUGGESTION:

Create a new forum for licensed covers, with a sticky post explaining how exactly to do this and what you need to put in your post to show you're in compliance.

Last edited by Mark Hayes; 01/05/22 08:02 AM.
User Showcase
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,509
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 7,509
Originally Posted By: Mark Hayes
The forum rules don't just prohibit copyright violations. They say, "You are allowed to post links to your own original songs." (emphasis added)

You're correct - AFAIK the goal is prevent copyright violation.

Modifying the language to clarify that would be helpful, as would information on how to obtain rights.

PG Music generally polices the forum with a light hand, and forum users tend to be the ones who remind people about the rules.

I've seen people who have posted music that they don't own the copyright post the information about their license in the song post.

People who have used Public Domain music often will say that as well. Janice and Bud come to mind.

But the use of Public Domain songs can become complicated because the version that someone may think is under Public Domain may not be because it uses an altered melody or additional lyrics. The original material will place that particular version under copyright.

So, for example, J&B will often include some history of the song, and an explanation of how their version is based on the PD version, and not a more contemporary version.

Given the complexity of determining and demonstrating the rights to a song, it may be simpler to keep the prohibition as it is.

But I think your suggestion is a good one.


-- David Cuny
My virtual singer development blog

Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?
User Showcase
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,689
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 1,689
Originally Posted By: dcuny
Given the complexity of determining and demonstrating the rights to a song, it may be simpler to keep the prohibition as it is.


It's not PGs responsibility to make such determinations and demonstrations, though. They don't have to, they properly charge their users with that.

I just covered (sort of) the traditional Irish tune "Star of the County Down", assuming the justification that it is public domain.

Suppose, now, that Fever Ray decides to (unfairly!) accuse me of stealing their style for my version and goes on to accuse PG of being complicit in that infringement by allowing me to post a link to a Soundcloud recording of it.

Well... at that unlikely point, PG can just delete my post.

I'm saying, non-lawyer that I am, that I cannot see PG as opening itself to any legal liability by allowing public domain material, any more than they already are by allowing "original" material – which could, after all, always be plagiarized.

Last edited by Mark Hayes; 01/05/22 11:06 AM.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!

Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.

Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano

Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!

Bonjour à tous,

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music

Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:

BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation

Voilà, enjoy!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!

Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:

https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025.exe
https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025RB.exe

Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!

Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Stay up to date—get the latest update now!

Update to RealBand® 2025 Build 5 Windows Today!

Already using RealBand® 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 5 now from our Support Page to ensure you have the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Get the latest update today!

PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 for Windows is Here!

PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 is here! This new version introduces many features, including VST3 support, the ability to load or import a .FLAC file, a reset option for track height in the Tracks window, a taller Timeline on the Notation window toolbar, new freeze buttons in the Tracks window, three toolbar modes (two rows, single row, and none), the improved Select Patch dialog with text-based search and numeric patch display, a new button in the DirectX/VST window to copy an effects group, and more!

First-time packages start at only $49. Already a PowerTracks Pro Audio user? Upgrade for as little as $29!

www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm

Video: Summary of the New Band-in-a-Box® App for iOS®

Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new Band-in-a-Box® app for iOS®! Designed for musicians, singer-songwriters, and educators, this powerful tool lets you create, play, and transfer songs effortlessly on your iPhone® or iPad®—anytime, anywhere.

Band-in-a-Box® for iOS® :Summary video.

Check out the forum post for more information.

Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics84,140
Posts775,214
Members39,566
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
AudioQuestions, jl1, DKL, EdHumbleton, sindanform
39,565 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 192
DC Ron 100
rsdean 95
WaoBand 93
BYOBand 68
Noel96 68
dcuny 68
Today's Birthdays
Hiram
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5