Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#735108 10/17/22 08:32 AM
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Does anyone else see a need for the Utility Tracks to be treat the same as Legacy tracks with respect to bar settings and volume control?

I wasn't a BiaB user when the distiction between legacy and utility came into being so I'm sure there is a lot of history here. But I find it quite clunky to have to go into the AudioEdit window and add in nodes to mute a utility track that I might not end up using.

Note in the screen shot that the "Piano" track is not on the Bar settings list.

I also notice that WendyM is currently struggling with this (or a related issue) so I'm guessing others struggle with this too.

I'm aware that the individual tracks can be exported and then imported into a DAW where you have full control over volume levels. I'm doing this more and more in Studio One thanks to MarioD's comments. But when sketching out song ideas in BiaB quite often I need a quick listen to see if the track is even worth keeping in the song. So to export, import and adjust a track in S1 only to find I don't like it is even less efficient.

Is there a reason why Utility tracks are "2nd class citizens" ?


Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Screenshot 44.jpg (169.34 KB, 154 downloads)
Last edited by Bass Thumper; 10/17/22 08:34 AM.

https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2026 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,512
Veteran
Online Happy
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,512
We’ve had many discussions about this and I think you are correct. The conclusion we came to last year was that the natural evolution of ‘all tracks are equal’ means that major changes in BIAB are required to make Utility tracks function as the legacy tracks do now.


BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Thanks Matt


https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2026 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,567
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,567
+1 for making utility tracks exactly like legacy tracks even if it means major changes to BiaB. YMMV


Back in my day the only time we started panic buying was when the bartender shouted "last call"!

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,073
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,073
There should be a more common operating functionality for the Utility tracks so as to match the legacy tracks.
Another vote of support.
+1


BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,849
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,849
< Does anyone else see a need for the Utility Tracks to be treat the same as Legacy tracks with respect to bar settings and volume control? >

Not at all. That's a step backwards. Besides, PG Music developers made all the Legacy Tracks work the same as Utility Tracks with respect to Mute/Unmute and volume control that provides greater accuracy and control and it's nearly universally ignored. The Bar Settings and Volume Control tools are better in the Utility Tracks than the coarse, rudimentary controls of the Legacy Bar Setting Dialog Window.

< Is there a reason why Utility tracks are "2nd class citizens" >

Yes. It because folks prefer to export files to DAWs for simple editing tasks even though it can be done faster and function's exactly the same when doing them in the Audio Edit Window.

Counting exporting to a DAW as an option, there are ten other tools in the Audio Edit Page to treat a Utility Track instrument volume. The most used and recognized method is 'export to a DAW' followed by volume automation and I speculate 90% of users can't name all ten.







BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,220
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,220
Charlie, I completely disagree with your opinions.

1)Settings at the bar for Util tracks will save a lot of time, especially for sketching out stuff. ACW is great, but it is for fine editing. And will take ten times slower to do same in Settings at the bar. And if you change number of bars / insert bars, good luck re-volume everything. They are different features, and I hope that both will be available in future.

2)There is absolutely no reason for Utility tracks not to gain full functions of legacy tracks. Especially Shots, Holds, Rests. Offering existing "workarounds" for these is no go, as they are absurd.


A Big +1! to OP post.

Utility tracks have been evolving, but not there yet. To make full use, they have to match capabilities of legacy tracks, there is no doubt about it. I hope that this is something in the books for 2023. Or at least a good step forward, either Settings at the Bar or Shots, Rests, Holds and Pushes. Hopefully both smile

P.S. Bass Thumper, I don't like "workarounds" when it involves core functions, but I thought you should know that you can use ACW to node control volumes of instruments for now for Utility tracks. Not ideal solution compared to quick and easy "Settings at the bar", but at least doable. Actually, if proper automation is programmed to ACW in the future, I would prefer that instead of Bar Settings. But that is another discussion. There is a benefit to ACW as you can adjust volumes precisely. If you are not aware of the method, see attached.

I am much more worried about Shots, Holds and Rests for Utility tracks. I hope it is being considered as the workaround for these is very painful and for the sake of sanity, I will not even mention it here smile

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
acw.jpg (251.93 KB, 133 downloads)
Last edited by Rustyspoon#; 10/17/22 12:37 PM.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,512
Veteran
Online Happy
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,512
To be equal, I suppose the legacy tracks and utility tracks must work exactly the same way, but I see Charlie’s point and I was very careful not to commit to supporting a particular solution. Making a few dozen tracks all controllable by radio buttons and F5 would be a serious rewrite.

PG Music has not stated how this will be handled, to my knowledge, and I can still see some version of ‘separate but equal’ being plausible. If the slogan ‘all tracks are equal’ had not been used, and instead they had said something like ‘new this year, additional tracks for storage’ there wouldn’t be the fuss over ‘equal’ and we would just get our work done.


BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,220
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,220
Matt,
Radio buttons:
"a few dozen" - 2 dozen + through and master
I am fairly certain that most people who came to BIAB in the past 10 years do not use radio buttons. (this would actually be an interesting poll) While I read users arguments "for" them, a sensible solution would be to be able to hide... and reveal this bar, which is taking valuable screen real estate and has absolutely no meaning or uses to most newcomers. There are several ways these radio buttons can be handled. For example 1) all can easily fit in two rows 2) display only those, which tracks are occupied. 3)A custom number.

F5 Menu:
I made and shared a mock sketch some time ago and they should all fit on screen with slight rearrangement of existing buttons. Again, there are "ways" to do this ergonomically pleasing. For example dynamic sizable window, similar to what we have with mixer, or choose a custom list of tracks to be displayed, etc.


While you might disagree, extra tracks was/is one, if not the most significant features in BIAB for me and I am sure many others. Hoping that PG team will find a good way to handle volume/mutes in bulk and solve Shots, holds, rests for Utility tracks.

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
Originally Posted By: Matt Finley
If the slogan ‘all tracks are equal’ had not been used, and instead they had said something like ‘new this year, additional tracks for storage’ there wouldn’t be the fuss over ‘equal’ and we would just get our work done.

Yeah, claiming a new feature that obviously is not true is always gonna cause a "fuss"!

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
Originally Posted By: Rustyspoon#
Charlie, I completely disagree with your opinions.

I agree with Rustyspoon 100%!

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,849
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,849
Originally Posted By: JohnJohnJohn
Originally Posted By: Rustyspoon#
Charlie, I completely disagree with your opinions.

I agree with Rustyspoon 100%!


No surprise. Misha didn't even mention the issues (in bold lettering) I responded to in my reply.

The subjects I addressed were specifically directed to the volume choices that can currently be made in the Bar Settings Dialog Window (F5) in comparison to Utility Track Bar Settings choices.

There's no question that Utility Track equivalent Bar Setting selections are finer resolution and more accurate than the Bar Settings selections. There's no question that Utility Track options that have also been expanded to apply to the Legacy Tracks and offer multiple methods to use to manipulate Utility Track and Legacy Track audio.

So when Bass Thumper wasn't satisfied with the clunky audio automation function, you guys didn't stay on topic and explain any alternatives to him, the conversation strayed off topic about "all tracks equal" and Misha presented a laundry list of shortcomings that were not mentioned in the original post. Regardless of the interpretation you fellows thought you read in the original post, the topic was clearly stated. The phrase "all tracks equal" isn't mentioned in the original post nor my reply.

The cause of the issues listed in the first post is Bass Thumper only knew of Volume Automation for the track he was working on.

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Volume choices in Bar Settings.jpg (17.26 KB, 99 downloads)
Volume adjustment choices in Bar Settings

BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,073
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,073
If I go into a recording studio, the mixing console has the same set of controls and features for every channel.
I think that is the consistency we are possibly looking for.

Separately, if I know I don't want the guitar to play on measures 9 to 12, on Legacy tracks I can easily do this with <F5>, before I ever need to generate. This is not that straightforward with a utility track, I need to use a completely different method to achieve the same result.

Without getting into a debate, 'consistency of operation' across all tracks is really what is required (I believe).


BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,220
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,220
Charlie,
Actually I wrote my "laundry" list, as you coined, before you posted yours. It just took me more time to prep graphics. And when I saw your reply before posting, I responded to it.

I believe, I replied to OP questions and voiced my support for his request.






Last edited by Rustyspoon#; 10/18/22 01:01 AM.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,567
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,567
Originally Posted By: AudioTrack
......................

Without getting into a debate, 'consistency of operation' across all tracks is really what is required (I believe).


Exactly!


Back in my day the only time we started panic buying was when the bartender shouted "last call"!

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 274
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 274
Originally Posted By: AudioTrack
If I go into a recording studio, the mixing console has the same set of controls and features for every channel.
I think that is the consistency we are possibly looking for.

Separately, if I know I don't want the guitar to play on measures 9 to 12, on Legacy tracks I can easily do this with <F5>, before I ever need to generate. This is not that straightforward with a utility track, I need to use a completely different method to achieve the same result.

Without getting into a debate, 'consistency of operation' across all tracks is really what is required (I believe).


exactly what I'm looking for.
A drop down in the F5 box showing ALL enabled tracks.
Wendy x


BiaB2022PLUS,927. every extras pack I can find ;-),Sonar7XL,Win 10
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Veteran
OP Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2020
Posts: 2,755
Originally Posted By: AudioTrack
If I go into a recording studio, the mixing console has the same set of controls and features for every channel.
I think that is the consistency we are possibly looking for.

Separately, if I know I don't want the guitar to play on measures 9 to 12, on Legacy tracks I can easily do this with <F5>, before I ever need to generate. This is not that straightforward with a utility track, I need to use a completely different method to achieve the same result.

Without getting into a debate, 'consistency of operation' across all tracks is really what is required (I believe).

First, let me say that I consider myself a BiaB newbie that stumbled into the issue of not being able to mute a utility track in the same easy way that I can with legacy tracks and therefore requested a wish for this to be improved even though there is a (clunky in my opinion) work-around. I have no clue as to the historical background here and why this is the case.

Second, I apologize if my original post was not as well articulated as it could have been. And being the newbie that I am, I would never presume to be knowledgeable enough to specify how this wish should be implemented. There are contextual, historical, user-base, software and other ramifications that I will never be privy to. This is the domain of the experts. In any industry, multiple factors must be balanced, including customer experience with the product.

Third, AudioTrack captures very well what I tried to express. Because workflow matters, my brain appreciates intuitive and consistent software design.

Fourth, my interest is for PG Music and their awesome flagship product to be as successful as possible in the ever-changing and competitive domain in which they operate. There will always be competitors nipping at their heels. This (in addition to achieving smoother personal workflows) is why I offer suggestions in the wishlist.

Fifth, (an element dear to us bass players) smile let's pay it forward, share the love and work toward the common good.


https://soundcloud.com/user-646279677
BiaB 2026 Windows
For me there’s no better place in the band than to have one leg in the harmony world and the other in the percussive. Thank you Paul Tutmarc and Leo Fender.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,220
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,220
Bass Thumper,

"I apologize if my original post was not as well articulated as it could have been."

It is very well articulated.

"Because workflow matters, my brain appreciates intuitive and consistent software design."
"let's pay it forward, share the love and work toward the common good."

Bravo!

Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,512
Veteran
Online Happy
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,512
Bass Thumper, this is like many threads: it goes in several directions, provokes reactions, and helps to clarify what we want. It's good you brought it up again, as PG Music alone needs to decide how to make the next improvements.


BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 36
R
Enthusiast
Offline
Enthusiast
R
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 36
+1 for being able to easily mute/unmute Utility tracks on a certain bar without having to remember how to do it in the ACW automation. If I'm already muting tracks in the F5 Bar Settings menu or in my DAW, then I really don't want a 3rd place to manage it which I find takes longer to locate the exact bar to work on.

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!

If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!

If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!

Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.

PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!

PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.

The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.

The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.

Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!

Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.

Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!

Order now!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!

Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!

We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!

Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.

Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.

There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!

Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.

If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!

Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!

We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.

When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.

Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.

Happy New Year!

Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.

Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics86,085
Posts799,928
Members40,030
Most Online44,367
Mar 4th, 2026
Newest Members
Airllines, roshan2121, Din, AurealiusB, sam31985
40,031 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 158
DC Ron 94
rsdean 93
WaoBand 86
DrDan 71
Today's Birthdays
bassonjason
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5