Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
#116104 06/04/11 06:17 PM
Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
J
Jally Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
J
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
Hello;

I’ve been recording my trumpet using a Shure 58 into an UA-1G into PowerTracks. I am new to this. I’ve read that 57's and 58's are great for gigs but not great as recording mics.

As a result, I don’t know if I should be buying another mic (your recommendations would be appreciated) to improve the sound quality of my recordings. I don’t know if I would need to replace the UA-1G as well.

I understand that there are a lot of things that can be done during the mixing stage that can improve the sound of a performance but I’m not there yet.

I am wondering if you would be willing to listen to a sound bite and let me know if I am on the right track with the sound that I am getting. Trumpet is live. The rest is real tracks.

I would appreciate any advice.

http://www.twobucksdanceband.com/thats_all_snippet.mp3

Thanks

Jally #116105 06/04/11 06:25 PM
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,165
SM 57 and SM 58 have been on a ton of hit records in featured spots, including horns.

I think you're doing fine so far. Nice tone.


I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
Jally #116106 06/04/11 06:30 PM
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,232
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,232
The Shure mics shound great with your horn.

DrDan #116107 06/04/11 07:06 PM
Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,035
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,035
Warm tone and good intonation. Nice sound.

To improve on this, you would probably have to spend $600 to $1,100 on a ribbon mic, and most of those require a more expensive preamp that has more gain than usual.

The 57 and 58 have the same element; the ball on the 58 gives it a slightly different response that horn players and vocalists like.

I think you're doing fine.


BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Off-Topic
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,706
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,706
Sounds great . . . I would not change a thang!

Welcome aboard!

Jally #116109 06/05/11 09:05 AM
Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
You would be hard pressed to improve on the sound your are already getting by replacing the mic.

The Shure '57 or '58 as you have is an *excellent* choice for recording the Trumpet.

Problems arise when Internet newcomers to the art and science of recording begin to pontificate about stuff like this. Most start recommending large diaphragm condenser mics and phantom power, etc. etc.

But the Trumpet has such a high dynamic range ability that it is exceptionally easy for we TruMpet players to overdrive such a microphone as the large diaphragm condenser, plus they are typically too sensitive and pick up more of the room, sometning that is typically not that desirable in home recording environments.

Hell, I can *destroy* a large diaphragm with my horn if I have a mind to do so, and likely so can you from the sound of your embouchure, etc. And don't even *think* of what either of us could do to a Ribbon Mic... - There'd be little pieces of tinfoil confetti floatin' around the studio when we got done *grin*. A Trumpet in the right hands can generate up to 7 Watts of RMS Audio Power at the bell. Stupid kids have actually managed to permanently damage other kids hearing with trumpets in school bands, never a funny trick to blow a trumpet or trombone into someone else's ear. Or into their expensive and sensitive ribbon or condenser mic, either. We play the instrument of the battlefield, man.

The Cardioid Dynamic Mic is still my mic of choice for Trumpet (and Trombone) sections.

I have quite often specified those Shure mics for pro recording sessions of both sections and soloists.

In my opinion, the only step up from your Shure that would really mean something also has that pesky "Law of Diminishing Returns" riding along with it, meaning that the amount of money spent that is over and above the cost of the Shure is far more than the amount of improvement gained in sound quality.

And if you must know, that mic is still Cardioid Electrodynamic design, same as your Shure, it is the infamous Electro Voice RE-20. Great trumpet mic when used in a great acoustic environment with an even greater mic preamp.

But you really don't NEED to spend that kind of money on a new mic for your intended purpose, what you've presented here sounds very good indeed to this old recording engineer and trumpet player's ears, man.

"If it works, don't FIX it."

One thing I've learned to do over the years is to *NEVER* discuss the technical aspects of my recordings when presenting them. I just put 'em out there and sit back and watch the listeners. And remain mum.

That is because I have found out empirically that if I go ahead and volunteer any technical info at all, it invites the kind of situation which prompted your question.

So I never maention anything at all before or after the presentation of the recording.

If asked a specific wuestion such as "what mic did you use for the ________?" -- I have learned to respond with a question: "Well, what Mic do you *think* I used?"

As Duke Ellington once pointed out, "If it sounds good, it IS good!"

And your recordeing sounds GOOD, man.


--MAC

Mac #116110 06/06/11 06:44 PM
Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
J
Jally Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
J
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
Thanks for the input everyone. I appreciate the kinds words coming from other musicians. I'll keep trying.

Jally #116111 06/06/11 07:24 PM
Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,035
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,035
It sounded good. And, disregard what I said about ribbon mics. I'm going to tell all the studios that have used them on me that they were wrong.


BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,672
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 12,672
I surely didn't hear anything wrong with that recording. Sounds great...post some more!


John

Laptop-HP Omen I7 Win11Pro 32GB 2x2TB, 1x4TB SSD
Desktop-ASUS-I7 Win10Pro 32GB 2x1.5TB, 2x2TB, 1x4TB SATA

BB2025/UMC404HD/Casios/Cakewalk/Reaper/Studio One/MixBus/Notion/Finale/Dorico/Noteworthy/NI/Halion/IK

http://www.sus4chord.com
Jally #116113 06/07/11 04:04 AM
Off-Topic
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 491
Journeyman
Offline
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 491
Jally, Just adding my comments......same as the others.....lovely warm sound! As Mac says.."Don't change!" I've recorded Trumpeters several times in my little home studio ......with studio condenser mics AND SM58s........the horn guys always liked the SM58 sound better! You have horn players here, who really know their stuff....if they say .....it's a good sound...then it is! Regards, Joe G.

Off-Topic
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
M
Mac Offline
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
M
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Quote:

It sounded good. And, disregard what I said about ribbon mics. I'm going to tell all the studios that have used them on me that they were wrong.




Hey Matt,

I didn't say that you could not use a ribbon mic on a Trumpet.

What I said was that a Trumpet can indeed generate enough Sound Pressure Level to SHRED one, or at least risk damaging the ribbon.

But this also must depend upon the particular player and more importantly, the STYLE of their playing at the time of recording. A lot of Latin style Trumpet, and especially Flugelhorn, isn't likely to be the same kind of playing that a Section might have to belt in a bigband or the likes.

But you know that.

The advice was given to someone recording at home with their own limited amount of equipment available and regards the purchase of - or not - a new microphone, one microphone. At that point, we shouldn't be looking at specialty tool as much as a tool that is *easy to get good results, *doesn't pick up much of the room, which is very likely not going to be studio acoustics, *covers a wide dynamic range such that any type of music style could be conceiveably recorded with the least amount of technical setup and provision to the user, that sort of thing was where I was headed.

At a well-equipped studio, if charged with the Tracking Engineering, I might go to the well-equipped mic cabinet and select a Ribbon mic for you as well, after auditioning what was to be recorded. Or maybe not. A lot depends upon other factors as well, such as what type of mic each particular engineer favors, what type of preamp they intend to use, sometimes it grinds down to what they feel most comfortable with using.

Bear in mind that in the studio there is typically another person involved at least, that
Tracking Engineer can manually "ride the gain" if need be to prevent overdriving inputs or other possible means of distortions that can occur while the recording is being done. A person playing by themseles in the home studio is likely better off concentrating on the playing and using a mic/preamp combination that is pretty much "set and forget" in order to git-r-done.


--Mac

Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
R
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
R
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Jally, that recording and mix that you posted sounds better than a good 99% of what shows up on home recorded forums that I haunt.

I would say that with the ribbon mic that I have; a Cascade Fat Head - one of the less expensive ribbons on the market - you would run into the issue that Matt Finley describes - you likely wouldn't have enough gain in the UA-1G to get a nice clean signal.

It has been a somewhat disappointing mic in that regard. So you would be looking at a system solution that not only includes a ribbon mic of lower noise floor, but also a pre-amp and for that matter, likely spending some major coin on treating your recording space.

What you are doing now is working VERY well, and you have a good ear for mixing.

Record away. Sell some music (if that's your goal).

-Scott

Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,035
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,035
Mac, thanks for the clarification. My ribbon mic at home is pretty much 'set and forget' so it can be done. I worked up to the optimum input level very slowly and carefully, and adjust only the preamp output for specific instruments. In the studios, they regularly bring out an old 1950s RCA ribbon mic for me, and we love it.

Scott, good call. That Fat Head mic is well-known on the trumpet forums as the least expensive ribbon mic to get a 'warm' sound. Next up in price is a Beyerdynamic at around $700, then the two Royers at over $1100. All require lots of gain in the preamp.


BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
J
Jally Offline OP
Enthusiast
OP Offline
Enthusiast
J
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 33
Again, I will say thanks for the feedback.

And after reading your postings I am hoping (REALLY hoping) to have the same dumb luck the next time I try to record as I had the last time.

Cheers.

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support

Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins

Join the conversation on our forum.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac Videos

With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.

From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.

Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Mac Videos — we’ll be adding more videos as they’re released!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!

Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.

2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.

If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!

Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.

Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano

Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!

Bonjour à tous,

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music

Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:

BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation

Voilà, enjoy!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!

Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:

https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025.exe
https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025RB.exe

Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!

Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Stay up to date—get the latest update now!

Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics84,312
Posts777,606
Members39,615
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
JerryL, kottke, kaleu, Claudio Paolini, bjornen71
39,615 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 140
zedd 118
DC Ron 103
rsdean 93
WaoBand 90
nonchai 85
Today's Birthdays
oublaj
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5