Quote:

Just look at the Styles Wishlist.



I agree with that to a point when the wishlist is for a style that either doesn't exist yet or there is only one option. My point was that any given style (country waltz as an example) may have 30 flavors that are ALL pretty the same, so the question becomes why have so much redundancy, redundancy that just detracts from the time of creating music. Like I said in another thread, I have spent as much as 2 hours auditioning styles that had descriptions that either made no sense or made them look like the 29 other choices.

Sure if there is no "Cajun stomp with fiddle", let's add one. Or "Slovenian polka/Frankie Yankovic". Let's add one. But another 12 that are SO slightly different from many existing styles.... that is just more spam to sift through.

Rather than just whine, how about this suggestion?

I used country waltz as my example. Could we have them set up as

Country Waltz

as a category, then inside the category that wold be a drop down have

WITH FIDDLE
WITH PEDAL STEEL
WITH SLIDE GUITAR
WITH FIDDLE AND PEDAL STEEL

and so forth, and the from each of THOSE drop downs, have

option 1
option 2
option 3

Let me know where I am starting. I STILL don't know who George may be or what a train has to do with anything. Everybody doesn't know the history of music since the caveman days (sorry, Geico) or know dead musicians by first name to make the connection to what "George" is supposed to be in a style. I can name many people named George who have nothing to do with music.

Of course I am being sarcastic but do you get what I am saying? George Strait? George Jones? George Thorogood? George Gobel? George Clooney? George Lopez? George of the Jungle? Gorgeous George? Who is George and how is that supposed to give me an idea of the style?