|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450 |
Hi!
Can anyone tell me, is there any point in changing the audio preference settings to 24 Bit (96/48/44.1, assuming soundard can handle it, for playback, if the Realtracks are below this sample rate?
Is it just for adding higher quality samples, midi instruments & recording, as I'm assuming any resampling that RealBand does would not effect the quality of the Realtracks.
If you are just using Realtracks, I'm assuming that 16 Bit 44.1 would be the best option.
Also, would this be the case if you had the Audiophile edition?
Thanks
Col
iMac, 3.7 GHz 6-Core Intel Core i5, BIAB MAC2024 (802), Audient iD4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 100
PG Music Staff
|
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 100 |
I am sure many people will want to weigh in on this interesting question.
Re-sampling will not directly affect the quality of the RealTracks on their own.
In my opinion 24bit Audio is great especially if you are using heavy duty plugins where the algorithms will tend to work better on 24bit audio, which will give you a bit of a better result.
Or if you are heading from another program to RealBand or a recorder it makes sense to keep everything 24bit 48Khz in some cases.
some sequencers and many of the multi track recorders will render audio temporarily in a 32 bit floating point format. Before the file is output it will go through the 24 bit converters on whatever interface you might have this all allows for better multi channel mix summing and plugin operation before it gets sent to the 24bit converters in the card. Many people like to take their 24bit final mix and then use a dithering plugin as they do a final conversion to 16bit.
If plugins are not a big consideration then I would tend to suggest keeping everything in 16bit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 791
PG Music Staff
|
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 791 |
Quote:
Also, would this be the case if you had the Audiophile edition?
The Audiophile's audio files are 16 bit, 44.1 kHz. So setting the sound card to 24 bit would not be a benefit, unless you are using plugins as Rob has explained.
As for the sampling rate, changing to 48 kHz would cause the 44.1 audio to be resampled. This would cause a tiny amount of information loss. If resampled back down to 44.1, once again a tiny amount of information would be lost.
Resampling the bit depth from 16 to 24 does not cause any information loss. This is also true when going back from 24 to 16, only if NOTHING happened to the audio while it was at 24 (no plugins applied, no gain change, etc.). So if you must change your sound card's bit depth to 24 because you are mixing some 24 bit recordings with RealTracks, it won't hurt the quality of the RealTracks.
Blake
PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Cant speak for the realband files, there is a big benefit to recording new audio tracks in24 bit. Quantization signal to noise ratio is 48 dB better than with 16 bit. What this means in practical terms that one can be a little more carefree in setting gain setting on input signals; using less gain but still getting a clean recording.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,193
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,193 |
IN THEORY, I agree with Scott. Recording at 24 bit is preferable. The theoretical noise floor of a 24 bit recording is -144dBFS. You're not going to get that. On a very high end converter, you MAY see -130dBFS, much more than that, you're going to run into electron noise. Mathematical computations don't have to take into consideration hardware, so 32 bit floating will technically give you better sound.
On a M-Audio 2496, which is probably the most recommended PCI card around, your A/D converter has a dynamic range of -100dB, A-Weighted, but they don't give you a whole lot of specifics about how they tested it. The D/A portion gives you about 104dB, again A-Weighted. The A-Weighting is important, because it will give you 2-4dB better specs than no weighting at all. Very few companies that I am aware of use non-weighted numbers. Those are the REAL numbers to look at. Also, how does the company test things like THD+N?
M-Audio makes a decent product, for only $100.
Look at something like the Digi 003 Rack, and you're not going specs that are too much better. Dynamic range of 110dB, which isn't bad, but THD+N of -103. They don't tell you how they read that. At what input level and what frequency?
My point is that most gear that you're going to get is going to use between 18 and 20 bits, the rest is just noise.
By all means, record at 24 bits, it'll give you *something* over 16 bit, but don't expect miracles.
Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 450 |
Thanks all, for the very informative replies.
I use an M Audio DELTA-AUDIOPHILE 192 & yes I do use a number of Plugins.
Blake suggested using 24 bit 44.1 (rather than 48kHz)when using PG Audiophile realtracks, I guess when using "regular" PG realtracks they will be resampled anyway.
So what would be the best option: 24bit 44.1, 48, or 96 (for multiple plugins & AP192)?
Col
iMac, 3.7 GHz 6-Core Intel Core i5, BIAB MAC2024 (802), Audient iD4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,459
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,459 |
What 24 bit gives is a bit better headroom for recording, in a sort of digital way the bits and such "fit" better. It is not dramatic, but it helps when recording a tad hot. The difference between 44,100 and 48,000 is not hearable to me. I thing that 24 bit 44,100 is a perfect place to record. I do however record a 32 bit float a lot, and find that very clean.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2025, Realband, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 9 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Sample rate will not matter for headroom. 24 bit gives an additional 48 dB of quantization signal to noise ratio over 16 bit.
32 dB will offer another 48 dB of quantization signal to noise ratio over 24 bit.
Note: this is not the actual entire signal chain signal to noise ratio - just the noise do to the dithering between the amplitude represented in a single bit - the 'flip' between what the a/d converter considers zero level, and the first blip off of zero level.
The math works out to 6 dB of qsnr increase for every bit.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
Update to RealBand® 2025 Build 5 Windows Today!
Already using RealBand® 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 5 now from our Support Page to ensure you have the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Get the latest update today!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 is here! This new version introduces many features, including VST3 support, the ability to load or import a .FLAC file, a reset option for track height in the Tracks window, a taller Timeline on the Notation window toolbar, new freeze buttons in the Tracks window, three toolbar modes (two rows, single row, and none), the improved Select Patch dialog with text-based search and numeric patch display, a new button in the DirectX/VST window to copy an effects group, and more!
First-time packages start at only $49. Already a PowerTracks Pro Audio user? Upgrade for as little as $29!
www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm
Video: Summary of the New Band-in-a-Box® App for iOS®
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new Band-in-a-Box® app for iOS®! Designed for musicians, singer-songwriters, and educators, this powerful tool lets you create, play, and transfer songs effortlessly on your iPhone® or iPad®—anytime, anywhere.
Band-in-a-Box® for iOS® :Summary video.
Check out the forum post for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,066
Posts775,051
Members39,584
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean