|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 479
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 479 |
It seems to me that the computer based recording software is reaching a saturation point. Matt and I use sonar x 1 as, I assume, a few others here. So I realize what keeps all these companies cruising a long are the faithful upgraders year after year. Personally I always want what ever the latest and greatest version of that software might be. I'm beginning to wonder what usable improvements are left? If the big boys are all scrambling to clutter things up how long will it be until that new version isn't quite as attractive? It gets harder to justify new hardware as it seems to be discontinued in a relatively short time. Luckily for p g the well of you realtracs is just about bottomless. WSS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926 |
The real answer, of course, is new power and revenue enhancement. *mwa-ha-ha-ha-ha*
Nuendo, Cubase's big brother, is a complete AV production suite comparable to Sony Vegas. They manage to come up with enough enhancements that every couple of years they can charge $1500 or more for an upgrade to the latest and greatest version.
Many of their improvements have to do with taking advantage of processing power. Since version 2 users have been able to run it on networked PCs. Now that an individual machine can have 64 Gb or more of RAM I'm not sure that's necessary, but more is always better, right?
Another thing is being able to handle new file formats. There's always something.
I'll have to ask a friend, a dedicated amateur who is currently on version 4, what makes him keep at it. I know that between versions 2 and 3 they changed their sequencer file format to something that wasn't backwards compatible, so if you were transferring files with friends or co-creators who upgraded you had to have the new version. I do know that it is an extremely stable and robust DAW. Has to be when you're working in a professional production environment.
"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Not to worry, Microsoft is pretty much guaranteed to up the performance ante (or the bloatware ante, if you will) by introducing those entirely new Operating Systems that will no longer allow you to run the DAW software and/or the audio interface that you already own...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572 |
Here's hoping that Windows 8 will accept Windows 7 drivers for my Tascam, since Tascam has announced they will no longer support the equipment model I have.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,126
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,126 |
Quote:
Not to worry, Microsoft is pretty much guaranteed to up the performance ante (or the bloatware ante, if you will) by introducing those entirely new Operating Systems that will no longer allow you to run the DAW software and/or the audio interface that you already own...
It is my hope that consumers will take a more responsible position in the computer audio world. Ultimately, the consumer determines the course of development of a product - to put it in simple terms: if we ain't buying, hardware/software producers will soon take action to find out what it is we will buy.
Marketers and advertisers do their best to influence the consumer, frequently employing unethical means, but it is well within the ability of any person to do some research and separate hype/nonsense from useful information.
From a more positive perspective... if we make it clear that we want solid value (and will accept no substitute), ethical members of the computer music industry will be happy to comply - and their advertising costs will drop dramatically, thus lowering the price of their wares. Everybody wins. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,031
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,031 |
Thing is though - why throw out perfectly good computer/interface/software just to keep up with the latest. My main music and video computer is still a Core2Quad and it runs everything perfectly - as long as it does and I produce my end result i.e. CD or DVD who cares how I got there. I reached saturation point with VSTi's and VST effects a long time ago. I mean - how many compressors, equalisers, reverb units etc do I really need. The same with VSTi's - unless a new synth is radically different - why bother? I must be the kind of guy the sales people hate! I refuse to make myself poorer just to have the newest for the sake of having the newest and impressing my friends, neighbours, whoever. That being said, I do fly along with the latest from PG Music twice a year - I feel BIAB is worth it. I will not upgrade to Windows 8, I will not buy any new computers until something breaks and I am forced to. I will not upgrade just to satisfy the CPU and memory needs of the latest VST plugin either. And half the time buying a new computer means a new sound card due to missing PCI slots (some new motherboards do not have them). I still have an old HP Vectra 486/25 computer with an AWE32 Soundblaster card and a Roland MPU-401AT card with daughterboard installed in it which still runs OK on a mixture of DOS and Windows 95. All my very old software i.e. BIAB ver 2.0, Cakewalk 4.0 for DOS, Cakewalk 3 for Windows et al. I have a whale of a time with the old stuff and I can still use it to make music. So Matt as long as your Tascam works with Windows 7 - why upgrade? Kevin 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572 |
Thanks Kevin, I agree, I will not upgrade unless/until I know my current equipment works. In fact, my production computer for music is older than yours, a Core 2 Duo that I built. It's fine.
I was forced to upgrade from Vista to Windows 7 because of instability issues that were solved in Windows 7 64-bit. At the time, Tascam refused to release the Windows 7 driver that we knew already existed from Frontier Design. A dogged but respectful user campaign was able to overcome this, but Tascam declared 'never again'.
As a former computer science prof, I like to keep up with the newest things so I can give advice to family and friends, and sometimes here online. That doesn't mean I will upgrade on my machines that work as intended, only on a spare test machine.
Oh - and salesmen? I drive them crazy too, for a variety of reasons. I actually managed the first retail computer center in northern New York in 1980, so I have some experience on both sides of this.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Matt, are you using a US224? If so, Ryzsard is looking for Win7 64 bit drivers for his. The reason I suspect that's the model is because of the Frontier Design mention - wasn't the US224 the only TASCAM/Frontier combined product?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926 |
Enquiring minds seriously want to know.
"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572 |
Tascam FW-1884. About $1,300 new in 2004. It's a sound card, mixer and control surface.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 479
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 479 |
Hey that just dawned on me. I am about to pull the trigger on a sweetwater creation station 450. Maybe I should wait until windows 8 is up and actually running. It's going to really ***** me off if roland doesn't support the V 700 system. WSS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,572 |
Sweetwater should be able to tell you if your proposed equipment purchase works in Windows 8 beta.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,259
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,259 |
I guess I could bloviate for awhile on this topic, but I'll just say that forced upgrades really tick me off.
Stan
Cornet Curmudgeon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Not a conspiracy, Stan, but simply the ramifications of what happens with emerging technology.
Some day these things will likely be mature, or at least nonchanging over longer periods of time, but I wouldn't recommend waiting until that day before going ahead and working with what we already have.
Just a decade or so ago, dong what we take for granted, multitracking, effects, editing, etc. was a very large dollar investment only available in studios $$$. When comparing that to the price of new recording software or new puter and new sound device, it is pennies on the dollar no matter the perception.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,259
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,259 |
Quote:
Not a conspiracy, Stan, but simply the ramifications of what happens with emerging technology.
Some day these things will likely be mature, or at least nonchanging over longer periods of time, but I wouldn't recommend waiting until that day before going ahead and working with what we already have.
Just a decade or so ago, dong what we take for granted, multitracking, effects, editing, etc. was a very large dollar investment only available in studios $$$. When comparing that to the price of new recording software or new puter and new sound device, it is pennies on the dollar no matter the perception.
--Mac
Hi Mac. I'm not a conspiracy whacko. You make a good point about the decline in prices over the years. I'm not against progress either. In fact I just got a new system that's lightning faster than my 6 yr old laptop. I keep reading allusions of those who are waiting in the wings for Win 8 and I think to myself, "Won't there always be something about to emerge on the tech scene?". I can't help but reflect on all the 32 bit programs that I'm running on my Win 7 64 bit system. I have to admit that I'm trying not to think about win 8 right now.
We both know that money talks and BS walks. I remember when Quicken decided to change their file extension which forced everyone to buy their new program--and some of us didn't even like or want it. My credit union dropped it and has never looked back. Of course I do very little online banking with them now. Personally, I think the tech industry has taken on the mantle of produce or perish--both hardware and software. I'm not a state-of-the-art geek, but I no longer have any floppies either. If you stop to think, it really is incredible that our society is so involved in tech stuff as compared to even less than 10 years ago.
Stan
Cornet Curmudgeon
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,792
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,792 |
I use a Dual core With XP Pro, it rocks me for around 20 + tracks with plenty of power for VSTi's, VST's. It processes tracks fast, and easy with RTs and RDs galore. I refuse to rush to the latest. I watch folks jump to 64 bit, and then spend countless hours fighting drivers, and such. Nope Not here. When the system begins to bog down i will upgrade to a reasonable level. My daw is 9 months old, I bought the parts a geeks.com, and built it myself, the one i replace is 10 year old XP system that actually still runs fine, just a tad slow.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 827
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 827 |
It applies to all consumer items, which is just what computers have become. In fact there is probably a better life time line on some computers than say cars, or general electrical appliances. You're not going to scour the tech press for the latest toaster, but is you need some spare part for it, forget it. Most things these days are made on batch order, full stop. The next batch could be completely different, and is normally not the same quality as the first one anyway. There is of course a market for custom built equipment, but I for one am not in that range. On some stuff even the manufacturer of a follow up batch is different, and when the spares run out, that's it. Either you make your own or you buy a new one. It annoys me as well when I have to buy a new sound card just because the laptop manufacturers have deemed that PCMCIA is not worth the trouble of installing in new models. On the other hand I think we invest too much emotion in our computers and gear. The only reason I am changing my computer is that it is so slow that it can't do Realband and Realtracks properly, let alone the Amp-Sim I bought. Otherwise it still runs perfectly after 6 years.
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,987
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 8,987 |
When you take into account the R&D time involved, the products currently on the shelves already have 2 or 3 new generations heading toward production. Some call it planned obsolescence. Couple that with the rapid advances in technology and we soon realize the pressure being exerted on manufacturing to meet demands for "the newest and best - the latest and greatest" in new products. In my humble opinion, the market is being driven by teens and early 20s consumers which is creating many interesting techno gadgets. We all benefit by those gadgets. Example: Nearly everyone in this nursing home, including those in their 90s, seems to have a cell phone and many have GPS although they aren't going anywhere. They use them to find the dining hall I guess. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
"Planned Obsolescence" is a tired old 60s term that just does not fly in the face of digital developments.
As with the air/aerospace revolution, the digital tachnology revolution is driven almost entirely by Resarch and Development which is proofed by actual consumer acceptance or rejection of each new idea.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,211
Posts801,975
Members40,071
| |
Most Online64,515 Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|