|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,796
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,796 |
Tried to expand work from a BIAB 2012 audiophile arrangement, mostly using the _WSwing.. .STY stuff, at first all worked well, but then with generating new tracks and regenerating parts of tracks and new solos on new tracks RB 2012 v6 keeps crashing and also my PC, WinXP, hangs.
Error log:
(2012 (6) Alpha (2)) 20-5-2012,12:26:31 - Access violation at address 0040C907 in module 'realband.exe'. Read of address 00000000 at: 0040C907
(2012 (6) Alpha (2)) 20-5-2012,12:26:47 - **Tracks (Ctrl-1)** - Access violation at address 00781D5C in module 'realband.exe'. Read of address 00000004 at: 00781D5C
(2012 (6) Alpha (2)) 20-5-2012,12:26:53 - Access violation at address 0083B320 in module 'realband.exe'. Read of address 00000007 at: 0083B320
(2012 (6) Alpha (2)) 20-5-2012,12:37:00 - Access violation at address 0082A867 in module 'realband.exe'. Read of address 00000004 at: 0082A867
-F
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,026
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 4,026 |
Mine crashed a lot until I started using MME drives, had to close the program when I changed drivers for it to work. Never crashed again, I'm using XP service pack 1, don't know if that could be you're problem. Also have heard that you may need to set your audio properties to do not map this device, with ASIO drivers. Maybe if you could post what your specs are someone might could help you more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,696
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 1,696 |
Fiddler - I use only MME with WinXP SP3. Virtually no crashes in RB2012(6). 2.5 GB RAM with a 2.4 GHz Chip.
I use two HDs and keep my TEMP DIR on the other HD from the program.
FWIW - Ian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 130
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 130 |
Windows 7 64 bit. Very infrequent errors. Mostly fine. I found that my lower horsepower laptop didn't like 64bit, E-mail 32 bit is solid .its a dell inspiron. 1501 with 4 gb ram.
U use asio for my rpc-1 in the desktop. Asio for my tascam US122 MJII on the laptop .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,796
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,796 |
well, thanks for the advice; the ups and downs of progress (??) in computerland: i use a separate firewire drive for PG stuff, 8 core Intel PC ... and i prefer asio, and my midi interface also doesn't eat windows 7 64bit .... Other stuff like BIAB and Cubase work well in my setup among video editors and other heavy weight stuff - F
Last edited by fiddler2007; 05/21/12 06:29 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 130
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 130 |
Quote:
doesn't eat windows 7 64bit
Yah...I had to upgrade (to the oldest cheapest TASCAM US-122 MkII I could find on CR  ) on the move to 64....got off cheap.
My stupid fone's predictive text (and my fone's stupid owner who doesn't proof read) resulted in some typos.....I figure you get the idea.
I have to say, I treat Real Band like a "special olympics" kinda player in my SONAR (or Cubase)-friendly workstation. You have to move slowly, let it finish, answer "yes" if it asks you an obscure question (like after recording a midi track, "shall I put the audio on track nn?"..heh...sure RB, knock urself out). I try to do as little editing there as I can, I save frequently, I very patiently click&drag among the fluttering, and I fix the drag w/ F7(start)/F8(end) section adjustments (thanks to LynB here for that tip).....I use SONAR for the "in the weeds" stuff.
Don't get me wrong; the gorgeous functionality that exists NOWHERE ELSE in cyber music production makes RB a winner; just gotta take it with the warts. Some kind of workflow can prolly be designed to leverage RB with your needs; BYO patience.
Last edited by jazaddict; 05/22/12 10:05 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 8,021 |
Here's something that's a little interesting.I was a long time user of Cakewalk 8.0 moved up as far as Sonar 8.0. I haven't touched Sonar in a very long time. I've used RB exclusively since it came out. I'm a very experienced user of PG programs and an experienced user in general. I'm a Beta tester for PG as well.
My close friend uses Sonar & BIAB and never moved on to RB. I'm his Mr. Fix it when it comes to his setup.Every time I try to do something in Sonar I'll be darned if something doesn't mess up. I never have issues with RB.I really think that if you paid close attention to the program that you most use I think you'll find that you've found work arounds and little tricks etc. whether it be RB,Sonar, Audition etc.It's all a matter of what you get used to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 130
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 130 |
Lotta truth to that I'll admit, but there's really no comparison in audio and midi presentation and features between sonar and RB. They can both crash and lose ur work if ur not a vigilant saver . I suppose that if u give PG a chance to catch up they could well give the big digs a run , but fir now its just not close....and I feel fir fiddler. Its a PITA when ur system and a cool program like RB don't get along.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,690
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,690 |
I find Rb a little behind Sonar in the depth of the feature set. Having said that i also find that there are a lot of features in Sonar i will never need, and that for my simple needs i never push Rb past it's limits.
Rb has far more features than we think sometimes, and if you dig into it I find it is pretty solid. I use ASIO and it is solid for me, some have issue with it. If so MME works great.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697 |
Quote:
... and i prefer asio...
Why? What excactly do you need it for?
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,143
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,143 |
The way I look at it is, if relaband is used for nothing else other than the generation of a pile of realtracks then its worth it just for that reason alone.
Though I'm sure lots of cool music can be finished on it too.
musiclover
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 130
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 130 |
Quote:
.. and i prefer asio...
Why? What excactly do you need it for?
Its always had the lowest latency on my systems. Sorta the opposite of Tommy C...MMC was lousy, ASIO saved the day. If MMC is workin for ya then by all means stick with it.
Musiclover, I agree that the generation of real tracks justifies RB existence on its own...thats what got me. I'd submit that the cool music could be better finished in SONAR. That said, what's the goal? RB/BIAB are lots of fun and damn productive. I can't use SONAR to help me with chord changes...hell, can't get it to "generate" anything; not what its for....but after RB sets it up, SONAR can refine it...if thats what you're into.
Bottom line, damn shame fiddler is unable to get a solid environment to work RB/BIAB in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
I still haven't figured out how the Australian Security Intelligence Organization figures into Real Band...
It isn't going to be the driver as much as the latency setting you pick. Start at 512 and move up and down until you find your sweet spot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,690
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,690 |
There is nothing wrong with recording at one setting and rendering at another.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697 |
Quote:
...but there's really no comparison in audio and midi presentation and features between sonar and RB.
What exactly do you mean "presentation and features"? We've had this discussion before on this forum, RB does way more than you might think. I remember one discussion a year or so ago where we got specific. Well, how about if I want to do this? RB does it. How about that? RB does it. Really? What about this very cool Sonar thing? RB does that too. A lot of these things came up during beta testing and some of us were very surprised when we talked to the developers about it. Some of this stuff is not obvious, it takes a power user to explain it but that's true of every DAW out there.
Now having said that, you're a long time Sonar user, you're used to it and how it works and that's great not saying you should stop using Sonar and only use RB. Lots of Sonar users here. All I'm saying is I don't believe your statement is completely true. There are differences and two I can think of is automation and VST implementation. RB lets you draw volume envelopes but no automation using a control surface and there is a bug in the VST implementation comcerning tempo matching of plugins to the project. Otherwise, I can completely mix and master a project in RB just fine and you can't tell any difference to one mastered in Sonar. Work flow can be different, the look can be different but actually getting the work done? No problem. You want to talk audio editing? RB is very good, how about midi editing? RB is very good there too. How about using third party plugs? No problem RB will work with any name brand plugin is there is both instruments and effects. You want to use a $1,000 mastering suite? No problem.
Virtually all problems reported on this forum concerning any of that always winds up being user error. This stuff is very tricky as you know so a lot of noob's get confused. You see lots of threads here with people venting RB is a piece of crap, why won't it do whatever, etc, etc. Get down to it and the guy sheepishly says after a week "Oh, thats how it works, you guys are great" but if you didn't read that far all you see is RB must not be much good if all these prople can't make it work.
It works 98% of the time (nothing is perfect). Including ASIO.
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,789
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,789 |
Quote:
How about using third party plugs? No problem RB will work with any name brand plugin is there is both instruments and effects.
Ya got some good points there Bob, but don't go too far, least you forget - JamStix or Melodyn. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697 |
Quote:
...and there is a bug in the VST implementation comcerning tempo matching of plugins to the project.
That's what this means. I have Jamstix.
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,690
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,690 |
I did a project last year and actually did the project in three different host. I used Reaper, Sonar X1, and RB. When i was done there was no difference, and actually the RB version was a little bit easier to finish up. I used the same plug ins, virtually, and i was surprised. I hope that soon they address the VSTi timing issue, and that they add a more complete Automation system, similar to maybe Sonar or Reaper. If they do i will do almost all my work in RB.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 674
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 674 |
It's all a matter of what you like to work in - how well you find the interface "intuitive" to you and really not much more. most of the features and functions are available for each DAW. Use what you like!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 66
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 66 |
I used BIAB many years ago and recently bought
BIAB Everything pack 2012. By the time I understand
any of it they'll probably have a dozen more versions.
I can do a little and have a few bars of songs I'd like
to finish one of these days...
Is there anyway I can get faster help, maybe locally?
I live in the South Florida area. Maybe a pipe dream,
but I thought I'd ask anyway.
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
Season's Greetings!
Wishing everyone a happy, healthy holiday season—thanks for being part of our community!
The office will be closed for Christmas Day, but we will be back on Boxing Day (Dec 26th) at 6:00am PST.
Team PG
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window
In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,737
Posts795,482
Members39,942
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean