|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Which I guess you guys call mastering....
How do you make these songs so they sound the same everywhere? I have this thing where if I listen to the same song on 5 different devices they sound five different ways. I even see that here. One of my songs long ago sounded fine when I played it here. The next day I had an email saying there was too much bass. 2 hours later I had another email saying "I can't hear the bass". I have this feeling that no 2 of you hear the same thing when you listen on Soundcloud. How do I fix that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
No, that's not mastering -- it's still a mix issue. Mixing allows you to produce a recording that should pretty much sound the same everywhere. Like most of us (or at least me), you probably have not taken the time to acoustically measure your room to see if bass builds up and/or there are peaks and nulls. The way to overcome that is to acoustically treat your room, get a monitoring system you can trust and to find the best place in your room to record/mix.
I have not treated my room yet, so I am also stuck trying to play things in many different environments to get the best trade-offs in mix decisions. I have been reading about acoustic treatment for about a year now and I think I know what I have to do -- but I just haven't spent the money/time yet to get it done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
My room is irrelevant. Everything is recorded direct. There are no room acoustics involved when recording Real Band bass and drum tracks. Even when I record live instruments it is all line level. The only time a mic is involved is when I sing, and that is done in a foam lined enclosure that is completely anechoic. It's my inability to EQ correctly, and I go so far as to listen to the monitors and 3 different sets of cans, all of different quality, and I get 4 different sounds. When the near field sound good, the phones sound bass heavy. Then I take the same file downstairs and play it through the main 6 speaker sound system and it sounds okay. Over the the office computer with a 5.1 speaker system, bottom heavy. And while I CAN play with tone contriols on the various playboack devices, that's not the point. It needs to sound good everywhere with the playback set flat. Very frustrating to not be able to make the final mix consistent over any playback device.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Quote:
My room is irrelevant. ...
When you are mixing using monitors your room is very much relevant. ... and mixing using headphones has all the problems that have been discussed numerous times before (I mix using headphones -- ha, ha -- and monitors).
Quote:
...foam lined enclosure that is completely anechoic ...
Foam usually absorbs mid and high frequencies, so you probably have real bass issues in recording your vocals.
The reason you have too much bass and then not enough bass is most likely due to your room and your monitors in your room (and the headphones are not solving that issue for you).
Just my relatively "acoustic treatment" novice opinion here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Eddie, unless you mix exclusively with headphones, your room absolutely matters, where the speakers are located in each room, etc. all matters ALOT. Remember when you posted pix of your room and I was warning you about how close your monitor speakers were to the angled roof? You'll get all kinds of comb filtering off of that roof at your mix location.
The mix really can't sound consistent over different playback systems in different 'rooms'. What it can do is sound acceptable, but it will never sound 'the same'.
Even with treated rooms for mixing, that can't account for when you take your mix into a room with a corner loaded sub that is set a little high, that it's not going to sound different than playing it in your car, or over cans, etc.
Also, the passing of time reveals mix issues you simply can't hear when you are in the throes of a project. I listened to one of my songs I did about 5 or 6 years ago the other day and I was appalled by the 'room' sound in the reverb, a sort of unnecessary booming in the 250-500 Hz range. I would totally mix that thing differently now.
Here's a different test, where you say a song is bottom heavy - how about a reference recording being played back on that same system - is it bottom heavy also? When you know you are done is when you can take those reference recordings, and duplicate the playback anomalies in your own songs that are due to the system/room that are revealed in the reference recording playback played over the same systems.
This is why reference recordings are important to have on hand. Pick some recordings that you think have the vibe that you are shooting for and buy the CD. Take notes of how that sounds played back on the kinds of systems on which you want your recording played.
Make notes (recording X is a little bass-heavy on the 5.1 system - it's o.k. if mine sounds similar, etc.)
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 886 |
Quote:
My room is irrelevant.
Not if you use speakers at any point in the mixing process. The room can make a HUGE difference in how you hear things. For example, while mixing get up and move around the room, or simple lean forward or back & listen to how the sounds changes.
Quote:
And while I CAN play with tone contriols on the various playboack devices, that's not the point. It needs to sound good everywhere with the playback set flat.
That is the problem, hardly anyone listens to there stereos flat, it seems like everyone EQ's there system to the way they like it, mostly the old "smiley face" syndrome. .
But really, a lot of the popular tracks that everyone loves today sound different to me on different systems also, mostly in the "mud" area of 200 to 600Hz, so even the "pro's" are not perfect, tho they get a LOT closer than I do! LOL
Grab an analyzer, like the free SPAN one from Voxengo, place that after your EQ in the Master section, and adjust until the line is a flat as you can make it, then you have a flat mix.
Or grab the 21 day trial of the AAMS Software and give that a try....the advantage of this system is that it will give you a print out of what the audio is doing, so you can go back & make adjustments in the mix.
What, I am using my EYE'S not using my EAR'S? So what, it works for me and a lot of my clients that don't have the $$ to send it out. I am NOT a mastering engineer, but I can over-EQ & slam the life out of a mix with the best of them! LOL
i5 3.20GHz, 32gb RAM, 1tb SSD OS, 12tb HDD, 4gb gForce vid card, 32" monitor, Audient id44, Win10 x64, BiaB/RB 2023, Reaper 6,IK Multimedia Total Studio 3.5 MAX, Waves 10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Quote:
..Grab an analyzer, like the free SPAN one from Voxengo, place that after your EQ in the Master section, and adjust until the line is a flat as you can make it, then you have a flat mix. ...
Or, better yet, see what the EQ curve looks like on Voxengo SPAN using a reference track like Scott mentioned above. You will see that the EQ curve is not "flat".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
That is the problem, hardly anyone listens to there stereos flat, it seems like everyone EQ's there system to the way they like it, mostly the old "smiley face" syndrome.
Did you ever understand the smiley face? Boosting the far ends where the bands they are boosting are sub and super sonic and doing nothing to the frequencies the ear can actually hear?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
It just dawned on me that you guys meant the room acoustics when LISTENING. Duh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
Quote:
Quote:
That is the problem, hardly anyone listens to there stereos flat, it seems like everyone EQ's there system to the way they like it, mostly the old "smiley face" syndrome.
Did you ever understand the smiley face? Boosting the far ends where the bands they are boosting are sub and super sonic and doing nothing to the frequencies the ear can actually hear?
It has to do with the "Fletcher-Munson Curve".
http://forum.recordingreview.com/f8/fletcher-munson-curve-ideal-way-eq-24461/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Quote:
Did you ever understand the smiley face? Boosting the far ends where the bands they are boosting are sub and super sonic and doing nothing to the frequencies the ear can actually hear?
I don't know about you, but I hear just fine in nearly the entire audible band, and graphic audio EQs are manipulating the audio spectrum, not sub and supersonic (technically below 20 Hz and above 20,000 Hz).
The 'Loudness' button on many stereos is doing the low side of the smiley face for you. It's a matter of the equal loudness perception (look up fletcher munson curves) that is at play when listening at lower levels. It takes more juice in the low and high ends to sound similar to mids.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,457
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,457 |
The obvious thing to mention is that your mix is indeed going to sound different on different systems, and those people are going to judge that by reference of how 'other stuff sounds on that system'.
It comes down to the old saying; learn to know your monitors.
Listen to well done professional CD's on your system (at low volume) during breaks .. and let your ears adjust to that sound.
Then get your mix to sound like that 'on that system'.
Of course it will sound different on different systems. That's the reference part of monitors. That's where you start. You can't compare a boombox to a car to a home stereo. The idea is to learn how to make the mix representative on all systems, and that starts with knowing your own.
I'd like to get a little better treatment in my home mixing room, and I may remodel it this winter, but I've spent time learning the monitors and the room. Both matter. Not saying you need the absolute best of both, just that you need to learn the ones you have and get to where you can trust them.
Last edited by rharv; 10/08/12 02:44 PM.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Quote:
Listen to well done professional CD's on your system (at low volume) during breaks .. and let your ears adjust to that sound. Then get your mix to sound like that 'on that system'.
That's what the pros do and get huge amounts of money for it, right?
Quote:
I'd like to get a little better treatment in my home mixing room, and I may remodel it this winter, but I've spent time learning the monitors and the room. Both matter. Not saying you need the absolute best of both, just that you need to learn the ones you have and get to where you can trust them.
And there again, 10 different people will tell you 10 different "the best way" stories. "You want a lot of sound deadening material." And the next reply says "Don't overdo it with the sound deadening material." "Put your monitors right by your head and at ear level." And then "Keep your monitors away from you some." "Roll off the high end some." followed by "You want a good amount of high end for crispness."
I have read many articles online and in Electronic Musician magazine. They constantly contradict each other. Much like my songs do when played on different devices. One has too much high, one had too much bottom....
Some place out there is a "the way to do it". I'll find it yet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,353
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 3,353 |
Eddie. I think what you've just identified here, is that it's not an exact science.
rharv has it right - use reference CDs and learn how your own system sounds. Then compensate for any problems.
ROG.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Quote:
...
And there again, 10 different people will tell you 10 different "the best way" stories. "You want a lot of sound deadening material." And the next reply says "Don't overdo it with the sound deadening material." ... They constantly contradict each other. ...
I think if you read enough "experts" as opposed to general forum posters (like me!), then the contradictions start to fade away alittle.
For proper mixing, everyone agrees on this point: You have to be able to trust what you are hearing. That means:
1.) good placement of listener and monitors in a given space
2.) Best quality monitors you can afford
3.) Adequate treatment to reduce mid and high frequency reflections and deal with bass nulls and spikes.
#3 has a lot of controversy, but the consensus seems to be:
a) Measure your room using an omni-directional mic and free analysis software. Actually measure using a few possible monitor listening locations (if possible).
b) Print out the graphs and send to pro acoustic suppliers along with room dimensions and layout to get suggestions on what to do. (or post to sites like gearslutz.com)
c) buy or build the least amount of acoustic absorption material that you think will help out (1st reflections and some kind of corner bass trapping).
d) re-measure and see if it has solved your major issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Eddie,
The acoustic treatment items I have described to you in the past are well documented physics/acoustics behavior that are tried and true. I could break out the Euler's formulas and teach the room acoustics portion of my master's program, but I think that would quickly bore folks to death.
The room does matter when you mix. Your monitor placement relatively to walls and other reflective surfaces does matter when you mix.
My mentioning of using some reference recordings earlier in the thread should help you to see how they translate to the various playback systems you employ. Put your mixing of songs aside and do that homework first.
Try to avoid some of the no-no's of monitor placement - one of them being too close to walls and or reflective surfaces. Some things that can happen - too close to walls - you might be over emphasizing the room acoustic modes (translation - your mix will be bass heavy), too close to a reflecting surface that is not a wall - you can comb filter your mix very easily and it messes with your ability to properly eq mids. Comb filtering results when there is basically a strong time delay of a signal arriving at your ears at the same time as the direct signal, causing constructive and destructive interference based on the time difference of the reflection/direct relationship. One source of this is mixing with monitors place directly on the meter bridge of a large mixing desk. Yes, you will see SOME pros put their Yamaha NS-10 monitors on the bridge. But they are getting strong reflections off the mix desk surface. In your posts from maybe a year ago, I seem to recall your monitors being quite close to your angled ceiling in your room. It was a recipe for comb filtering at your mix location.
You can't fix all of this. Period. But you can work with reference recordings to get an idea how they sound on all the different systems you have at your disposal.
You can fix some of it. It's worth the effort to do so to eliminate as much of the distracting anomalies as possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
|
Anonymous
Unregistered
|
Scott, at some point tonight I am going to get some photos of my room and email you a link to them. I'd be grateful for your suggestions. They obviously don't have to be where they are now, but since I have never had them anywhere else I don't know the difference. Anybody else who would like to see the studio please let me know and I will PM you here with the link.
What I found interesting/astounding was that when my back is to the speakers, so my chair is spun around 180, it sounds different than when I am facing the speakers.
And I use powered Wharfedale monitors, 100w per side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 27
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 27 |
First, I have read a lot of books and articles on mixing. One thing I do is have a big pile of cd's and I burn one and go to my car and listen. Then I go to my main stereo and listen. Then I go to my second stereo and listen. I also will strem it via iTunes through my house and iPod. I take notes and tweak as best I can. It drives my wife crazy by the way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Quote:
What I found interesting/astounding was that when my back is to the speakers, so my chair is spun around 180, it sounds different than when I am facing the speakers.
This is due to the fact that your pinnae (your outer ears - Mickey Mouse's were big circles) have an intentional acoustic shadowing effect that will change the amount of high frequency that you can hear relative to low frequencies. This is one of the mechanisms/responses by which we are able to localize sound. This is not due to room acoustics - it's due to the acoustics of your ear shape and relationship to direct sound. You should note a decrease in perceived mid-high frequency content in the 'reverse' position. This is part of what tells your brain the sound is coming from behind you - this and the very small inter-aural time delays that occur as you rotate your head away from the source.
Look up Head-Related Transfer Function or HRTF for short, to see how your physical head and ear shape and whatnot 'EQ' sounds. It's a fascinating topic. There are binaural recording dummies (of which I have used Brüel & Kjær, Head Acoustics extensively, and to some extent GRAS and Neumann) which try to use generalized HRTFs to help record sound more in the way that we hear sound.
Regarding your room - from what I recall in previous photos, you had your monitors tucked right up against the angled ceiling of the room. This WILL cause comb filtering at your listening/monitoring location. To what extent remains a bit of a challenge - but one should avoid any hard reflecting surfaces within a few feet of your monitors - particularly the mid and high frequency driver locations for your monitors. Auralex recommends putting absorptive material (depth is dependent on wavelength) on surfaces where if you mounted a mirror, you can look from your listening location to the mirror and see the monitors in the mirror. This is simply ray-tracing acoustics at play. If the room is big enough, the comb filtering effect from walls dissipates as the reflected energy is much much lower than the direct energy from the speakers. However, the photo I recall from your room was that the monitors were nearly touching the angled ceiling. The reflected energy will be strong enough to constructively and destructively interfere (enhance and reduce) certain frequencies at your listening location.
-Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
Season's Greetings!
Wishing everyone a happy, healthy holiday season—thanks for being part of our community!
The office will be closed for Christmas Day, but we will be back on Boxing Day (Dec 26th) at 6:00am PST.
Team PG
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window
In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,738
Posts795,599
Members39,946
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean