Quote:

Way too general Zero. Look again at Peter's original post:

We would appreciate hearing any specific suggestions that you have - the more specific the better.
For example, do you want the ptoolbar, or piano area changed, etc. - if so how.

The more specific the better and you want to make changes, then explain exactly what and how the best you can.

A lot of these posts are like that, not just yours. They're like an average person looking at a portrait in progress. "She looks weird, he has to make her look better".

Gotta get specific, exactly how do you want the GUI to look? What is it you don't like about it? Be specific, is it the icons? How would you change them? The chord grid? How would you change that? The instrument menu's? How would you change those? Etc, etc. What is it that makes it look like Win 95 to you? As opposed to what?

Binars are supposed to be very logical, they make Vulcans look like emotional basket cases. Split that brain of yours and come up with something...

Answers to these types of questions is what Peter is looking for.

Bob



Your point is a good one...specifics are better. But I think everyone would agree if you compare BIAB GUI to most other modern software (Reaper, Excel, etc.) there are many obvious improvement opportunities that jump out at you. And I don't mean to criticize because BIAB works great and even if it is never improved visually I'll be glad to have it, but it kinda resembles a DOS program that was hastily ported to Windows 3.1! And I know function is more important than looks but the GUI does get considered when someone is thinking about new software. And if they judged BIAB just on its visuals I think it might not get fair consideration.