I read with some interest a post earler this week about speeding up your harddrive access with a properly defragged HD. There was also some mention of Piliform's Defraggler ( http://www.piriform.com/defraggler ). While I usually use the defrag program in MS Windows 7, I thought I would see if there is a difference with the Piliform program. To my surprise, after hitting analysis on each, MS said that my backup drive was <1% fragmented whilst the Piliform software said it was 43% fragmented. Why the difference? Is it a different algorithm? A better algorithm? Or just Piliform trying to sell their version?

By the way, I used the Piliform version on my 1TB backup drive....took over 15 hours!


Win11, Intel i7 7700K 4.2Ghz, 32Gb RAM, 2x1Tb HD, 500Gb NVMe, BIAB/RB 2025, MOTU 828MK3 audio, MOTU Midi Express, Yamaha Montage 7, DX7II, TX802, Motif XS Rack, Roland Fantom XR Rack, Oberheim Matrix 1000, VoiceLive3 Extreme, Kontakt 6, SampleTank 4.3