|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262
Apprentice
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262 |
Well - I took a little advice from everyone and here are the results. Realized - I do not have the best conditions for recording - switched from a condenser mike to my shure 58 - seems to pick up less of the nasty sound where I record. Went with a realdrums track. Tried to just balance things out a little better. Let me know if I am headed in the right direction - I think it sounds better. And thanks again from everyone who left pointers. http://soundclick.com/share?songid=7425309
The Powderman
Learning something new everyday
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 8,333 |
Sounds good to me, I'd try punching up the drums a tad, but that's a personal thing.
John Conley
Musica est vita
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436 |
Big difference in the new mix. It sounded good over here. I have a sm58 also I will be using as soon as I get the kinks out of my system. I like it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,724
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,724 |
Other than I'd like to hear the drums just a "weeee bit more" the difference to me at least, is day vs night. . . in a good way.
Nice Work,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,704
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,704 |
This is super. Don’t change a thing!
OK, a random thought;
Why does toilet paper need a commercial? Who's not buying it?
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199 |
Rich,
Real nice tune, VERY nice voice. I thought I heard a hum through the whole thing, though. I'm not sure. But, I enjoyed it.
Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262 |
I'll have to take a listen for the hum - I thought I dropped everything off down in the freq that would hum - but maybe not.
As far as the drums - I over did it the first time - and I am an old drummer who loves to hear the beat - in an effort to compensate I might have went a bit too far the other way.
Thanks for the comments.
The Powderman
Learning something new everyday
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 10,199 |
Rich,
Whatever it is, it's there right before you start singing, and then again, at the end of the song. What it sounds like is maybe a stuck bass note? Which would mean a 'hum' to me. I'd take a look at whatever you were using for bass, and see if you can't isolate that track, and see if that's your cause of what I hear.
Gary
I'm blessed watching God do what He does best. I've had a few rough years, and I'm still not back to where I want to be, but I'm on the way and things are looking far better now than what they were!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262 |
Gary,
I think you are probably right - I have had to go back on a couple of different projects lately and take out a "hum" which was actually tied to the bass line. I've notice it during some of my intros - but had not noticed in other areas.
Thanks
The Powderman
Learning something new everyday
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 973
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 973 |
Rich,that's just excellent.
Such a lovely relaxing backing and the Steel makes all the difference.
Of course,now we wait for the next one,hope we don't have wait too long.
Alan
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
Sounds like a much better mix. The ugly steel drop out at 0:08 just kills me, though.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 809
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 809 |
Nice voice. Could you sing it any lower? LOL. Good job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,122
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,122 |
Hey Rich.........
No comparison.......this version is far a way better. The first note of the intro started as soon as I hit play, without any space at all, almost sounded like the firsts part of the first note was cut off.
Drums I thought were right on.
The hum: I think Gary is right about the bass.
It works.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235 |
You certainly learned something! Wow what an improvement!!!  Really great! Now this way, the vocals get what they deserve, a spot in the centre, and on top of the mix, making it even more clear how much warmth and soul it carries. You did a great job. And as for the "hum" well actually I think it is also only in the intro. I think it could be a basspedal setting that you might have got activated for the intro. I tried that basspedal a view times and until now found it an ugly extra, that seems not to do what I wanted it to do, maybe it just doesn't suit my music. But well that is another story. All in all I think you did a great job. On one way I would like to see the vocals a bit more tight with the rhythm, now it seems that you walk behind the beat quite often, coming in a bit late, on the other hand it makes the vocals also sound more ... hmmm... vulnerable, softened(?), I don't know how to express what I feel it as well adds to it. The only thing, besides the "hum", that is still really not nice, is as Kemmrich allready mentioned , the sudden stop of the guitar (followed by a kind of misplaced single pianonote) at 0:07-0.08 seconds.
I'll be back...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,576
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2000
Posts: 14,576 |
Wow! What kind of preamp you using there? Pro sounding cut. Your voice is balanced perfectly. The drums are ok. I've heard pro recordins that didn't sound much better than this. You might compress the drums just a tad and that would probably do it. However, about ½ way through the song the drums come on strong. Now they're balanced good.
Needs some harmony. I can hear it in my head. But as is it's great. Good on ya Mate. Ya got a winner here.
Oh. One last thing. Give it some start room. It starts playing as soon as you push play. Needs at least 2 seconds of delay time there.
Russ Anyday above ground is a good day Computer is Hp Pavillion Vision 6 Ghz quad core AMD processor 8 Gig memory 1 TB hard drive 6 GB hard drive Windows 7 Premium Loose nut behind the keyboard 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262 |
Kevin,
Maybe I keep listening to the wrong place for the drop - somewhere close to that time is the break between the intro and the verse.
I'll give it another listen
The Powderman
Learning something new everyday
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
"Solo" the pedal steel and at between 0:07 and 0:08 -- there is an unnatural drop out. If you can't fix it , then I would cut the steel section from 0:06 to 0:08. You'll have to trust me on this one, it hurts the song. If I was a producer/ AR type guy, I'd probably end listening to the demo right there.
Kevin
Last edited by Kemmrich; 03/30/09 02:48 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262 |
Toucher,
Yeah I am sure it is the bass making what sounds like a hum. I went back and looked - I did have maxxbass by waves on that track experimenting with the effect ( thought I had taken it off). That may be the culprit.
And you're right - need a couple of seconds before it starts.
Thanks for the pointers
The Powderman
Learning something new everyday
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262
Apprentice
|
|
OP
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 262 |
Russell,
I have a very bare bones setup here. PreSonus TubePre going to Tascam usb interface. I've been thinking about upgrading the Tascam - got any thoughts on that ?
Thanks for the comments
The Powderman
Learning something new everyday
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,211
Posts801,976
Members40,071
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean