|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,148
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 23,148 |
Quote:
Cerio puts some truth on some word.
Plenty of young - and serious - musicians out there.
--Mac
When I started playing guitar years ago there were no guitar teachers in our area. Now there are at least 5 treaching music sudios that I know of and I’ll bet that there is even more. Plus these also teach other instruments. The reading music base has expanded in this area.
Whenever I get something stuck in the back of my throat, I dislodge it by drinking a beer.
It's called the Heineken Maneuver.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Entire Thread
|
Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Joe V
|
01/01/13 07:00 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
jazzmammal
|
01/01/13 07:17 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rharv
|
01/01/13 07:30 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Don Gaynor
|
01/01/13 07:47 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
carkins
|
01/01/13 10:07 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/01/13 10:21 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
floyd jane
|
01/01/13 10:37 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
MountainSide
|
01/01/13 10:40 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Kemmrich
|
01/01/13 10:53 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rockstar_not
|
01/01/13 11:36 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/01/13 11:56 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rharv
|
01/01/13 11:58 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
01/01/13 11:59 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/02/13 12:06 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
01/02/13 12:26 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
DrDan
|
01/02/13 12:28 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
01/02/13 12:32 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
DrDan
|
01/02/13 12:32 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
01/02/13 01:16 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/02/13 01:26 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
01/02/13 01:34 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
01/02/13 01:39 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
carkins
|
01/02/13 03:51 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rockstar_not
|
01/02/13 05:47 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/02/13 10:52 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rockstar_not
|
01/03/13 04:12 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Joe V
|
01/03/13 04:24 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rockstar_not
|
01/03/13 04:34 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/03/13 06:50 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rockstar_not
|
01/03/13 07:28 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Joe V
|
01/03/13 11:23 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/03/13 12:10 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
RobbMiller
|
01/03/13 02:27 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/03/13 02:36 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
DrDan
|
01/03/13 02:50 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
jazzmammal
|
01/03/13 04:07 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/03/13 04:09 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
jazzmammal
|
01/03/13 07:23 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/03/13 07:49 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Danny C.
|
01/03/13 08:13 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
CountryTrash
|
01/03/13 08:28 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
90 dB
|
01/04/13 01:41 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Joe V
|
01/04/13 10:47 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
John Conley
|
01/04/13 11:28 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
PeterGannon
|
01/05/13 11:08 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rockstar_not
|
01/06/13 04:33 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rockstar_not
|
01/06/13 05:11 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
PeterGannon
|
01/06/13 09:09 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Joe V
|
01/06/13 02:56 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/06/13 04:13 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rockstar_not
|
01/06/13 04:36 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/06/13 04:55 PM
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Matt Finley
|
01/06/13 04:59 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
DrDan
|
01/06/13 05:04 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Don Gaynor
|
01/06/13 06:15 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/06/13 07:00 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/06/13 10:03 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
01/06/13 11:03 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/07/13 12:16 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
JohnJohnJohn
|
01/07/13 12:25 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
01/07/13 03:16 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Don Gaynor
|
01/07/13 04:21 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
bobcflatpicker
|
01/07/13 04:33 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/07/13 04:28 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
John Conley
|
01/07/13 05:07 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Rob Helms
|
01/07/13 03:37 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
jazzmammal
|
01/08/13 08:39 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/08/13 11:52 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
floyd jane
|
01/08/13 01:57 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
jazzmammal
|
01/08/13 09:50 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Cerio
|
01/08/13 11:12 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/08/13 11:17 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
MarioD
|
01/09/13 02:24 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Joe V
|
01/09/13 02:34 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Keith from Oz
|
01/09/13 02:29 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/09/13 02:42 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/09/13 02:48 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Mac
|
01/09/13 02:51 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/09/13 03:04 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Don Gaynor
|
01/09/13 03:15 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
PeterGannon
|
01/09/13 02:42 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/06/13 04:20 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
jcspro40
|
01/06/13 07:33 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
jazzmammal
|
01/02/13 02:33 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
rockstar_not
|
01/02/13 06:03 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
jazzmammal
|
01/02/13 04:43 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Pat Marr
|
01/01/13 07:39 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Brallan
|
01/09/13 12:16 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
PeterGannon
|
01/09/13 01:17 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Joe V
|
01/09/13 02:08 AM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Rob Helms
|
01/09/13 04:03 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Cerio
|
01/09/13 07:34 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Matt Finley
|
01/09/13 07:57 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
KeithS
|
01/09/13 10:02 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Joe V
|
01/09/13 11:21 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
Cerio
|
01/11/13 08:28 PM
|
|
Re: Why not more 'regulars' that are in their teens, 20's, and 30's that actively participate in PG forums ? - or are there ?
|
MikeK
|
01/11/13 09:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.
Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Mac Videos — we’ll be adding more videos as they’re released!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.
If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,215
Posts776,432
Members39,596
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean