Is the reason melodyne does not work inside RB the same issues as with Jamstix?

If then would it not be a great plan to work on this, since that would be a great plugin to use in RB?

Is this something in the works or just not on the list?

I ask this with complete respect. I know that PG wants to please the users, and that there are priorities.

It is just that i love this software, and so much want it to really be the best. Being able to fully utilize VST technology is vital in the future.

I could not care less about skins, GUI, fancy modern looks. I love functionality!

Before someone chastises me for wanting this to "be like other softwares" I hardly think getting a feature that RB already has (VST) to fully work is not the same.

Also I am not calling the PG team out, just wanting to hear some dialog regarding this long term request.

I have made several other requests. Node based automation being one. I hope for that, but can live with the system we have, at least for now.

But VST implementation is vital. There are many VST and VSTi plugs with master timing request.

Just imagine RB with the ability to add Jamstix and multi output drum tracks, melodyne and the ability to open in FX and tune vocals.

Here is another though for the PG team. Take a look at the vocal tune plug in Reaper, while it is not melodyne, it is pretty cool with the ability to draw vocal corrections.

It is based on elastique technology. Guess what RB has elastique. Hhhhmmmmm maybe a joint venture with either Cockos, or just with elastique.

Lets discuss this issue, as it would make RB heads and shoulders above the others in my opinion.

HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96