That ain't it, with all due respect.

Look, the WMA is going to have both a brickwall ceiling in the high frequencies, plus a slight amount of distortion due to artifacts.

You can convert that to .wav format, but the better sampling can only recreate that which is already in the file to begin with, complete with that which is NOT in the file.

Which means that a WAV file of a WMA file is likely going to sound pretty much the same as it would in WMA format, it would just be stored in a MUCH LARGER filesize.

If you want the original WAV files, you should consider the Audiophile version of the program.

That said, I have not found a big enough difference to warrant the extra investment, and with good reason, you see, the Realtracks are only involved with the compression of only one lone instrument at a time in most cases, and those instruments don't really go into the very high audio frequencies all that much anyway. YMMV.


--Mac

PGmusic FAQs, Tutorials and Updates! click here

You must be Audiominds.
www.audiominds.com