|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436 |
Hi all; I wrote a 3 song medley about my divorce. 1. Heart's Can Turn To Stone= It's about talking to your kids about it. 2. Take A Good Look= About starting over, getting back out there, kind of. 3. Nobody's Fool= Is about the "At first" joy of ending a bad relationship, then the reality of it all sets in I sequenced the bass and drums, and played all the acoustic guitars. My friend Dale Sanders did the vocals. I hope you like one or all of them. Pardon my mastering skills, that is a whole profession in itself. http://www.soundclick.com/bands/default.cfm?bandID=926440&content=music
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,586
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,586 |
Hi Gene,
I really like the vibe you've got happening with these songs. Don't be too critical about your mastering skills, the mixes sounded fine to me. You've got a great sense of lyric and music. I'm envious! I liked all your songs but, for the record, my favourite was "Nobody's Fool".
Great stuff!
Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436 |
Hi Noel;
Thank you for the listen. I used some of Ray's tutorials on RB effects, etc. Real helpful. Digital editing is so amazing and fun. I had some hiss I could not get rid of without compromising the EQ. That is because I pulled the song off of a cassette. Hopefully, I am DONE with analog now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,586
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,586 |
Yep, Ray Thigpen has got some great tips and tricks. I have really appreciated his tutorials too.
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235 |
Fist of all let me say that I enjoyed listening those songs. I think they are very nice.
About the soundquality/mix I would want to say that the mix (volume-balance) is not bad at all, but some things were a pity:
First of all: what's with the wobbly sound (guitar?)
The ending chords are cut off in a pretty bad way.
Ducking (the compression or volume automation where the music is getting softer in volume when the vocals come in) should be not so drastic and audible . This was the case in the first two songs.
Here and there there is some distortion/crackle
I'll be back...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,122
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,122 |
Gene,
Wow, Nobody's Fool is a jewel for you. I like the lyrics, the concept of the song, the word play, the afterthought vibe, the arrangement etc. This could be one for a contest. A pro demo would knock this out of the park. Congrats........ As you've already noted, the mix isn't the greatest especially the vocals, but thats all fixable. The song is great.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436 |
Hi guys;
Thank you for the listen. It was really tough for me as they were taken off of a cassette. So what was there was kinda what was there. I didn't have the luxury of panning, eq on individual tracks, etc. It was kind of a save from analog to digital. I would be more than willing to send the raw wav to a more talented mastering guru, because these are the only cuts I have unless I do a complete re-record. Which is an option, of course.
Ab;
I heard the drop outs, etc also, and was disappointed. Probably my mis-use of compression and noise reduction to minimize the tape hiss. The originals are ok, they are just low in DB and there are tape drop outs here and there. I have one I would really like to try and save called He's Gonna Be A Cowboy.. Real good hook (for me) but the audio would be a challenge from tape.
Anyway, it's all fun, and I value all of your help and opinions.
Later;
Gene
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235 |
Gene, I checked something for you that might give you a good compromise for the tape-hiss. I did not work with it, just did a very fast check, but audicity (normally I don't use it) hass a plugin to use against tapehiss. It is very simple, not much settings, but what you do is take a piece of hiss only, make a profile from that and then preview it and determine the amount you want to filter. Worth trying maybe. Maybe there is so much hiss you will get a lot of aliasing, then try to find a compromise of reducing hiss while still preserving an acceptable quality of the audiofile. I know, there are obviously better plugins, I am sure of that, but for a freebie and a fast check it might be worth it.
I'll be back...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,815 |
I think the songs are pretty good -- therefore I vote for re-recording them. With realtracks, realdrums and you playing I bet you can get the tracks down pretty quickly.
Kevin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Mar 2009
Posts: 235 |
Citaat:
I think the songs are pretty good -- therefore I vote for re-recording them. With realtracks, realdrums and you playing I bet you can get the tracks down pretty quickly.
Kevin
Oh I certainly agree on the rerecording part. It certainly would be worth it. But if that is no option, well try whatever you can to make it work.
I'll be back...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086 |
Wow Gene you are quite the writer - I am impressed. And I love your friend's voice he reminds me of the Everlys. I agree with Noel and Toucher. I really like Nobody's Fool - Hearts Can Turn To Stone and the other one are not bad either. Audacity works pretty good on getting rid of some of the tape hiss - I also have a lot of old demos on cassette so I know the feeling.
Sundance
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,713
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,713 |
Gene, it all been said.
You are one great lyricist!
Nobody’s Fool is the winner for me. Great stuff.
Although a lot more work for you I think these songs are good enough to warrant a remake.
OK, a random thought;
Why does toilet paper need a commercial? Who's not buying it?
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 809
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 809 |
I liked Take a Good Look. Very nice tune. And your mixes are good.
Nobody's Fool was good too. I think you should put out a cd.
You are a good songwriter. They are few and far between.
Last edited by edbulmer; 04/16/09 05:17 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436 |
Hi everyone;
Wow, I love a good review! Thank you, I value everyone's input, because this site is the best forum I have ever been on. So full of talent from every aspect.
Ab;
I tried the Audacity noise reduction. I tried the sample thing, but the whole song hisses. I probably added too much because it really squashed the track to the point of whistles and weird noises. Remake probably.
Kevin;
Thank you. I have listened to much of your stuff, and am proud to have your endorsement.
Sundance;
Thanks for the listen. I tried the audacity thing. I think my levels were just to low with a cassette to get stellar results.
MarioD;
I'm glad you had time to listen. Thank you for your input. Glad you liked them. I should point out it takes me about a month per song. I just can't crank them out like I can the music. The lyrics come hard.
Ed;
Aren't you the one with the boat? Your songs are great. I listened to all of your samples one evening. Your kind comments are very inspiring. Thank you so much.
Well, perhaps a collaboration would be in order. I could lay down the chords etc, and get help with the vocals and harmonies and mastering. Then what? You would not believe how many times I have pitched those songs. They are from the 90's. But sometimes, the timing is everything. . . .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996 |
Hearts….
This has a nice authentic Eagles feel to it, in both the lyric and the musical development.
If you’re looking to re-record, I would slip the pause right in there at 1.18, rather than keep that rather empty passage (in fact, just the chords without any sort of hook) which takes us up to 1.30.
With the time you gain, you could add another rep. of the chorus at the end
Lyrically, this comes across as honest and heartfelt.
Wouldn’t have minded hearing the “a little crazy, a little cold” line again in the coda.
As to the quality of the recording, this has been comprehensively dealt with above.
Oh, and Gene – please take the ’ out of the title. ‘Hearts’ is a plural, not a contraction.
Good look
I think more development is perhaps required in the writing to take this from a pleasant enough, major chord structured mid-tempo number to a truly memorable song.
Don’t think it would take that much – a bridge, a hook, just something to enlarge the song’s footprint.
NF
This one rattles along nicely. Once again, pleasing melody and chord structure and a well-crafted song.
I particularly like the irony in the title – not a quality one would readily associate with country
(where the preference is generally for full on self-pity!)
Not sure about that “through” / “cool” rhyme, though
Overall, this is an impressive body of work about what must have been a challenging period for you Gene.
The only general criticism I would have is that the songs are perhaps a little predictable. I think with not much effort they could be sustantially improved.
Thanks for posting,
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436 |
Marc;
Thank you for the listen. I will check out all the things you mentioned when I get home from work. Thanks also for the english lesson. LOL I wondered about that as I put the ' in. I does have an Eagles feel. I like them alot. I appreciate the song structure tips. Good ideas. Song structure is hard for me. I usually go AABA. But when I listen to the radio, much is sort of free form, and less predictable for sure. Do you think the music or lyrics are predictable because of simple rhymes? "A little crazy, a little cold" was one of my favorite parts. It bears repeating.
I'm pretty sure a remake is in order, as I have more help than ever before, on this forum.
Best regards;
Gene
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996 |
Gene, when you get lots of feedback and helpful suggestions around here, it means you're on the right track!
I guess there are no hard & fast rules with structure.
Playing in my covers band makes me realise how simple many great songs are. You'd be surprised how many just find a chord progression and stick with it from beginning to end (Gloria, Talking 'bout a Revolution..)
..but even if you stick to a relatively conservative structure you could always spring a surprise or two in the instrumentation.
My apologies for the grammatical correction - spend my working life at the office doing that kind of thing and I just can't stop myself!
all the best,
Marc
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436 |
Oh, no problem. I use spell checker, but grammatical is something you just need to know. Many thanks . And I need song structure tips. That is what sets one song apart from the run of the mill, and makes it memorable.
Gene
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 996 |
http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio2/soldonsong/guide/song.shtmlThis is a topic which has come up several times here, as you might imagine. The link above is, I guess, a reasonable starting point. I find it useful to listen and observe what others do. And not just published writers, but fellow forum members too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 436 |
Marc;
That's a great website. I will be checking it out.
Gene
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
Whether you're exploring new features, checking out the latest RealTracks or Style PAKs, this is your go-to guide for Band-in-a-Box® 2026.
Check out this forum post for "One Stop Shopping" of our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Videos!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 100 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until May 15, 2026. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49.
Holiday Weekend Hours
As we hop into the Easter weekend, here are our holiday hours:
April 3 (Good Friday): 8:00 AM – 4:00 PM PDT
April 4 (Saturday): Closed
April 5 (Easter Sunday): Closed
April 6 (Easter Monday): Open regular hours
Wishing you an egg-cellent weekend!
— Team PG
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,211
Posts801,982
Members40,071
| |
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean