|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,129 |
Hi all, In a recent post, I mentioned the fact that I'm not very fond of the own sound of my voice - but I do like to sing (what irony !!!) I know vocal effects will never change the problems with the original signal, but I'm wondering if certain vocal effects might make the whole 'band sound' a little better, or in the case of covers - closer to the original recording sound (I realize some people believe in close emulation and others total originality - let's leave that debate alone for now  So if you are a singer out there - or even a guitar player that likes to occasionally sing in the absence of a singer, what advice can you give about the following: 1.) how to methodically work through different vocal effects settings to find what suits your voice, and where to fit it in the 'mix' (references to websites, books also appreciated) 2.) what vocal effects are obviously heard (obvious to those that are familiar with vocal processing, that is) in the classic pop and rock recordings of famous hit songs (any you mention can be looked up quickly on youtube - share your favorite)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,926 |
If you can sing in tune,* doubling works really well to add depth and texture to an otherwise bland performance. (Doubling is simply the process of recording and re-recording unison parts of a voice or instrument.) If you ever thought your recorded voice felt "thin" in comparison to popular artists, this is probably why.
This can be done as an effect, a la Michael Franks and Thunderbolt Newman (see Youtube for examples), in which the technique is very obvious, or more organically. Countless artists as divergent as Art Garfunkel, Sting, Barbra Streisand, and many, many others record as many as dozens of doubled tracks using little more than the most basic of effects, e.g., compression and reverb. Crosby, Stills & Nash were known for "tripling"--each artist sang on each part--to add to their distinctive sound.
Some artists go much farther and play elaborate tricks with panning and various effects such as delay and pitch shifting, especially in octaves. But I recommend working on the the basic "non-effect" of simple multiple recordings of your voice and playing around with the mix. Try putting your strongest performance front and center, then putting other tracks so far back in the mix that you can just hear them, and go from there. I think you'll pleasantly surprise yourself.
HTH,
Richard
*If you can't, that needs to be dealt with first. It can be easily managed with a neat hack using a MIDI track of the desired part and a harmonizer/pitch shifter.
"My primary musical instrument is the personal computer."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,675
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,675 |
Cher: autotune
Tommy James: Tremolo (Crimson & Clover)
Jeff Lynn: ELO telephone voice EQ & Vocoder: Mr Blue Sky
Eric Burton : the animals: Phaseshifter (Sky Pilot)
Peter Frampton: voice box (Do You feel like we do)
Beatles: doubling... when it had to be done manually and without software to fix it.
These are a few examples of using FX on vocals. Doubling and layering is a commonly used practice and is probably evident on just about every artist's singing these days. It is one of the few fx that when done properly is really not evident as an fx but simply adds a fatter, fuller sound to the vox line. Same on the harmonies. If you can hear it clearly, you're probably doing it wrong. Not counting where there are background singing voices, but they are normally harmony, and not unison.
The other FX, I'm not saying you shouldn't use them, however, generally speaking, in most songs, yeah, it's not a good idea to use them.
Go for a clean vocal recording regardless of genre.
In another post here recently I commented a bit on the vocal recording. Often, folks who don't sing well, or think they don't sing well, often try to use fx to cover up and "improve" what they think is a less than good performance. The result is often the exact opposite and draws attention to the vocals rather than people simply getting into the singer's vocal qualities. In reality, most folks who can hold a tune fairly well have a voice that tends to work fairly well with a nice clean recording of their voice in a song.
Neil Young, Tom Waits, and a whole host of other singers are probably not in line for a "singer of the year" award based on their vocal abilities, but since we can hear their vocals clearly, we have come to appreciate their singing for the unique quality that they exhibit in their performances.
There are the occasional songs, which use a new or unique effect quite effectively. But even those folks don't generally repeat it. Frampton, didn't use the voice box on anything else to my recollection. Tommy James left the tremolo to the guitar players after Crimson & Clover.
Unfortunately, Cher used the autotune as did hundreds of others and now, you still hear it even in country music. T-Pain made a career out of it.
As I pointed out in the other post, I too used FX to cover up and disguise the lack of quality in my early vocals. Mostly using excessive reverb. It's incumbent on the home recording enthusiast to learn how to record vocals well. It's not the impossible mission, but it does take time and some experimentation. A good quality mic, a pop screen, a mic stand, and proper technique and some time playing with settings and levels. Sing close in for a warm and intimate sound. I'm generally with in an inch or so even on my condenser mic.
Singing without FX lets you hear what your voice really sounds like. Once you hear it, you can then work on the deficiencies you hear. But if you try to cover it with FX, quite simply, you can't fix what you can't hear clearly.
Another tool: Melodyne. This tool, when used properly and with the correct understanding, can actually give you the tools to become a better singer, and I'm not talking about using it to fix the bad notes. It lets you see what the note looks like and where your vocal inflections are taking that note. There's a really, really good chance that you are not even aware of what you are doing to your singing by means of the vocal inflections. It's the stuff that the vocal coaches hear and train you not to do. I haven't watched AI for the past few seasons but the folks in the final 12 get vocal coaches for each week, and that is what they do to transform the raw talent into polished talent in such a short time. Most people who sing for fun have developed bad habits. Fix those and you improve your skill level by leaps and bounds. But, as I said before, to fix the bad habits, you gotta be able to hear them and recognize them first.
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 06/02/14 04:51 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 459
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 459 |
Joe, at the risk of sounding like a vocal pedagogist, which I am not, I would suggest if you're having problems with your vocals, you should find your modal voice (normal voice found within your vocal register), by trying lower or higher singing keys. Other options would be 'vocal doubling', 'side-chaining' and whole host of effects like reverb, chorus, tremolo, compression, etc., etc., all found in Power Tracks. Good luck!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,714
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 6,714 |
Joe,
I often tend to simplify things as many times the answer is indeed a simple one. I think this is another case of what Kajun Joe said above, i.e. finding your voice and simply practicing.
And when I say practicing I mean doing full songs, not just voice exercises, and then keeping doing them over and over. I would also suggest you keep recording your attempts and play them back this way you can track your progress.
Vince Gill who I think we will agree is a pretty good singer, once told me that anyone can sing, it just takes finding their key and range, then sing until you develop a style that fits both. But the key is to keep singing. It will not come overnight but you will notice improvements in a direct relationship to the time you put in.
Later,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Other than doubling i wouldnt say that there are many hallmark effects on vocals. I can only think of Phil Collins who seemed to always have what sounds like a short delay on his vox.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Season's Greetings!
Wishing everyone a happy, healthy holiday season—thanks for being part of our community!
The office will be closed for Christmas Day, but we will be back on Boxing Day (Dec 26th) at 6:00am PST.
Team PG
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window
In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Video: New User Interface (GUI)
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new user interface in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®! This modern GUI redesign offers a sleek new look with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, and a smoother workflow. The brand-new side toolbar puts track selection, the MultiPicker Library, and other essential tools right at your fingertips. Plus, our upgraded Multi-View lets you layer multiple windows without overlap, giving you a highly flexible workspace. Many windows—including Tracks, Piano Roll, and more—have been redesigned for improved usability and a cleaner, more intuitive interface, and more!
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,437
Posts791,980
Members39,884
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean