|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693 |
https://soundcloud.com/charlie-fogle/first-times****** Song Summary ************* Key=C , Tempo 86, Style is _CBALAD2.STY (Country Bal w PedSteel (85 RS)) RT in song: 1418:Bass, Electric, SouthernRock Ev16 085 RT in song: 785:Guitar, Acoustic, Strumming CrossoverSnappy Sw16 090 RT in style: ~362:Guitar, Acoustic, Strumming Ev 085 RealTracks in style: ~363:Pedal Steel, Background Ev 085 RT in song: 2001:Pedal Steel, Soloist CountryPaul Ev 085 RealTracks in song: 624:Fiddle, Soloist George Ev 085 RT in style: NashvilleEven8^6-a:Snare, HiHat , b:Snare, HiHat Open ******************* Here is the short of a long story. This is a new version of a song from many years ago, somewhere around 2003, that I created music to lyrics a songwriter friend, Rudy Spivey wrote from inspiration of the somberness of my daughter leaving the nest embarking on a new life of marriage, job and children. At the time, she still lived on the street she had lived her entire life on. I think Rudy captured her feelings and mood quite well. The music of this version is updated and heavily altered from the original. Originally, I wrote the music using a cheap Keyboard that had a few styles and decent midi sounds. I chose an uptempo, pop style with keyboards and distorted guitars and sang the lyrics. It was critically acclaimed. By that, I mean it bombed. It flopped. Everyone was critical of it and did not like the song at all. The song quietly disappeared into the archives of my attic and was quickly forgotten by all. Rudy is mostly a country writer with a slant toward the older, more traditional songs of the past. For this song, my music and his words were a bad fit. I recently came across the original CD while searching for something in my attic and I've been playing around with BIAB to see if I can salvage the song. I am presenting where I am at with the song now. I'm hoping some of you may be interested in taking the role of producer for this and critique this version as if you had this song to pitch to a country A&R person. What would you alter? Does the music match the somberness of the lyrics? Does it need to be re-worked from scratch with a different chord progression or should it just go back to the attic archives? My goal for this song is to put it within a framework that I can present it to Rudy as a song a country A&R person would find acceptable. He has not heard this new version yet. Is this redemption or another crash and burn?
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,051
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 7,051 |
I like the feel and production-sparse, tasteful, and sentimental! A nice song, and well delivered. I really like the way your voice works with it too! On the single phrase with the harmony that repeats I believe 3 times in the song, there is a little something awkward with the harmony I feel. Overall, very nice work!! Take care. Greg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,561
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,561 |
Nice lyric vocal and a clean production! The first time the snare left 0:38 it sounded abrupt to me -- like it came too soon or was missing a transitional roll. But that may be because I was focused on how good the drums sounded! I like it a lot but as a person with zero commercial aspirations I can't offer much help on the pitching.
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,052
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 4,052 |
Hi Charlie,
Very nice song with a genuine country feel in it.
I like the vocals and also the harmonies.
You asked for some comments on the arrangement:
I agree with the comment of Janice & Bud about the snare left at 0:38. Also I think that the drums in general (although they sound very bright and clear) should be a tiny bit less loud in the mix.
Finally it may be an idea to add a B4 (Hammond) real track in the chorus (at a very low volume) to get that subtle 'drifting' sound.
Regards,
Rob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8,499
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2012
Posts: 8,499 |
Hi Charlie ...
Alan here as Di takes a nap!
I played lead guitar in a country band for almost 45 years. Yep, I'm an old fart! I'll get to your questions before giving you a summary opinion. So, for what it's worth, here are my opinions.
It's a bit hard to really comment on the lyric and the prosody it has with the musical bed without having the lyric in front of me. The one thing that caught my ear, though, was the first two lines of the first verse... "Just finished college...Graduated this year". Most publishers and A&R folks are gonna tell you "They're redundant, find a fresh way to convey the message without saying, more or less, the same thing in back to back lines." I also feel they'd probably tell you " A daughter so dear" is to cliche and dated. A suggestion, but you can probably do better:
College in my rear view
Real life lingered near
Married my first love
A daughter the first year
In this example, you've said the same thing as in the original verse but in a fresher way with no redundancy. Also, the last line embellishes the theme (First Times)of the song line. I'm sure you could do better than that example, but feel free to use any part of it should you choose to.
I'd bring the drums down a wee bit. In modern country music, loud drums usually work fine. But, this is a retro country song, reflecting on an era in country music when drums were not so prevalent. Also, a little more reverb on the drums would soften them somewhat.
The lyric, with the exception I noted above, works for the era you're trying to recreate. The lyric is relatively simple, which fits the time period. It tells a story from beginning to end ... another important facet for that era of country music.
The fiddle and pedal steel are real nice fit! The fiddle reminded me somewhat of Johnny Gimble and the pedal steel reminded me of Lloyd Green. However, I think you need a guitar in the verses for the background. That's the only place I'd use it, though. You wouldn't want it competing with pedal steel and fiddle in other areas. I would use a guitar track with simple, single-string backing lead, somewhat in the style of Roy Nichols (Merle Haggard's guitarist in his early recordings). That would fill out the verses without making them cluttered.
One final thought ... retro/classic country is a very tough market in Nashville these days. There's not a lot of demand for it. There are very loyal listeners for the style, but they are small in number in the big picture. The folks who listen to it, for the most part, are not the folks who are out there spending their money on music. But, if Rudy is doing it as personal project without the blessings of Nash-Vegas, it might work for you (and him).
Overall, the concept is good, the musical bed is very good, with the exception of the back-up guitar part I mentioned. A lead singer with a strong voice and a harmony singer with a good high tenor would be a great fit for this. The chord pattern and arrangement are real nice ... liked that a lot!
It's a real nice song that needs a little polishing. Keep in mind that the demand for this type of music is not strong. But for those who enjoy this style of music (I do!), it's a niece piece that a lot of folks can relate to.
I hope my comments and observations were helpful. Good luck with it ... I enjoyed my listen! Best to ya.
Alan (and a sleeping Di)
BIAB 2024 Ultra Plus-all StylePaks*Win11*32GB DDR5*Rhyzen 9745x*AT 2035 Mic*Peavey Nashville 112 Amp*Ibanez ART120* Acoustic/Electric/Washburn D200S Acoustic*Stromberg Monterey Jazz Guitar Loops: https://aldavidmusic.wixsite.com/bestmusicloops
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,494
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2013
Posts: 4,494 |
Hi, Charlie !:))
One of your best productions
without doubt !:))
Cheers
Dani
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,646
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,646 |
Like the mix on this one, clean; thanks for sharing!
My TunesPsalm 57:7 My heart, O God, is steadfast, my heart is steadfast; I will sing and make music.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693 |
Thanks for listening and commenting Greg. I appreciate your kind comment on the vocals. You also have a good ear. The awkward sound introduced during the backing vocals is distortion from clipping. For this recording, I used a Boss VE-20 vocal effect box. There is an impedance mis-match between the Boss unit and the Presonus audiobox interface. Matching the two units usually requires several minutes of trial and error testing and getting into the Boss sub-menu's carefully tweaking the settings. Changing to another effect requires stopping and tweaking again. I did not hear the distortion when adjusting the two units through the speakers but each time I used the backing effect, distortion was recorded. For the recording, I dropped the volume to lower the vocals down into the music to reduce the distortion rather than re-record the vocals since this is a working demo version. A DI box may help solve this problem but I do not like to keep adding devices to my input chain. I will probably use this for my excuse to upgrade the audiobox 22 to the audiobox 44 which has two actual line inputs that will give me the line in stereo inputs needed for my desktop setup.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693 |
Janice & Bud, thanks for your comments and input. The abrupt change in the drums at 0:38 -- the change was intentional but placed in the wrong bar. It was supposed to follow the transition out of the intro but I accidentally placed it in the wrong bar so the change occurred late and with no transition. I had also raised the volume of the drums throughout the the mix to review how the drums matched with the music and overlooked resetting the volume before I rendered the file.
I knew I would be doing additional editing and possibly over dubbing to this song and planned to correct the drums in the updated version.
Regarding pitching the song, my friend Rudy has been a successful songwriter and is also a family member. He wrote this song as a private gift for our family enjoyment rather than a song he planned to ever pitch. He wrote the lyrics intending me to write the music. The problem was I made a poor choice of music that did not match what he or anyone else felt the music should be.
My plan today was to revise the song by developing new music with a country sound. My request for input to a country A&R person was to give forum members and opportunity to discuss their personal ideas as if they had this particular song to pitch. Your input about that would have been perfectly valid even if you have never pitched a song. Your recordings and productions are always top notch and solid.
As others have stated, this song is somewhat dated and not anything that we would expect to hear on the radio and will not actually ever be pitched for a record release. My goal is to develop the song to be an enjoyable listen for Rudy, family and friends and my friends here on the forum. I find I enjoy the music submitted here on the forum much more desirable to listen to than what I hear on the radio.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,471
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,471 |
.....It was critically acclaimed. By that, I mean it bombed. It flopped. Everyone was critical of it and did not like the song at all. The song quietly disappeared into the archives of my attic and was quickly forgotten by all. Rudy is mostly a country writer with a slant toward the older, more traditional songs of the past. For this song, my music and his words were a bad fit.
... I've been playing around with BIAB to see if I can salvage the song. I am presenting where I am at with the song now.
I'm hoping some of you may be interested in taking the role of producer for this and critique this version as if you had this song to pitch to a country A&R person. What would you alter? Does the music match the somberness of the lyrics? Does it need to be re-worked from scratch with a different chord progression or should it just go back to the attic archives?
My goal for this song is to put it within a framework that I can present it to Rudy as a song a country A&R person would find acceptable. He has not heard this new version yet.
Is this redemption or another crash and burn?
OK, it was interesting reading the origins and history of this song and your take on it, and questions concerning it's future. So, I will comment what I feel is an honest assessment of the song. Lots of questions have been asked. Let me say that .... IMHO..... this song is not ready for prime time. Nothing on the radio today sounds even remotely like this style. No, an A&R person would circle file this in 5 seconds. 30 years ago, perhaps this style would have had a chance..... today.... no way. Sorry if that sounds harsh but it is the reality on the country music business today. Turn on any top 40 radio station and listen for a few minutes. That ain't your momma's country music your hearing. Every so often, I take a trip back down memory lane and page through the notebooks of all the old stuff I used to write thinking that, perhaps, I can find a gem in there and using what I now know about recording & production, resurrect a "keeper" from the ash heap of history. Nahhhh.... some things are best left in the past and simply move forward and try to write something new, something a bit more modern, a bit more hip and on target for the music scene we have going these days. As far as the song in it's current state.... If you want to update it for old times sake, that's fine. Or.... you could use the idea and concept in it to write a new song from that old one. The story told is a good one. So start from that point and rewrite the song, update the melody and structure to what you hear being used today, and see what happens. My suggestion would also be to locate a local NSAI (Nashville Songwriters Assn) meeting group and present it to them for more input on this tune. Anyway, that's my take on the question you asked....."should it just go back to the attic archives?" Perhaps not..... you can work this up into a fitting arrangement, perhaps a few structural/chord changes and have something your friend will enjoy hearing.
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 07/23/14 05:40 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693 |
Thanks Rob and Ann-Marie for taking time to give your insight. I appreciate your kindness on commenting on the vocals. I like your recommendation of the B4 and will play with that idea some when I am working on the song in Real Band.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,544
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,544 |
Charlie,
I did not have the amount of time necessary for an in-depth previously (when you first put this up)... You have already addressed some things in your answers. But I'll reiterate some of those things just to be complete...
And this is with the understanding that you do not really intend to pitch this to today's market - that the intent is to end up with a good listenable song regardless of "marketability"...
The intro is long. Always a bad thing in a pitch session - and I get that that is not the intent - but that goes for any audience. Musicians might like long intro, but the average listener does not.
You have a nice spot at about :13 that would make a good start. When the steel starts...
For this type song, I would start with a finger pick guitar - bring the strum in later...in the 2nd verse - with the fp still going..
You have already noted the drums. They should definitely be a stick until the chorus. I would actually leave them out until the second verse. would also leave the steel off until then. Use for the intro, drop it in the first verse, bring it back in the 2nd..
You drop the steel when you hit the chorus, so you need something to replace it. An arp electric - or maybe the dreamy - it fits in a lot of places. An alternative would be a subtle rhythm piano...
Your fiddle lead is nice but needs to come up just a little.
You have the steel in the final chorus. It might be nice to pair that with a piano at that point (instead of the arp in the first chorus)...
Overall, I think you've done a good job on this. I do think it needs to "build" some as it goes to keep your listeners interested.
floyd
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693 |
Hi Alan, with all you guys have on your table, I really appreciate you finding time to offer your suggestions. As a country guitarist for 45 years, I have a vintage Gibson guitar you would probably enjoy spending a few hours with. It's actually a prototype and was featured on Antiques Roadshow several years ago.
My wife and I had a similar conversation about the opening lines and the redundancy. We decided at the time since Rudy wrote the lyrics as a personal gift rather than a song that would be intended to be professionally produced, it would be desirable to retain the original lyrics as much as possible and concentrate on the music. I totally agree with you though and may decide to update that first verse as the redundancy is so obvious.
I have completed some editing and revisions in BIAB, corrected the drums and I'm ready to move the song over to Real Band and I will try out some electric guitars. Good suggestion.
Your observations and comments were very helpful and much appreciated.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693 |
Dani, thanks for dropping by. Keep a lookout for the final version, there are some great suggestions coming in - I think it can only get better.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693 |
Pgfantastic, thanks for listening. I think your signature is so appropriate and inspirational.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,888
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,888 |
Hi Charly,
for the occasion it was written this song is
appropriate. Play it to Rudy. He will like it.
And you have got a lot of advice to tweak it.
But what for?
YOU must like it. I do.
Guenter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693 |
Hi Guitarhacker, thanks for your comments and I did not find them to be too harsh. In fact, you nailed it. I agree with everything you say. Regarding NSAI, Rudy is a member. He is a member of many professional songwriting organizations. Professionally, he collaborates with other songwriters a lot. As Alan noted in his post, he sometimes uses cliches. In fact, we tease him in calling him the king of cliches. He scours papers, billboards, restaurant menus and nearly everything else to find little sayings or cliches as song idea. Through collaboration, his professional work is at higher standard than this particular piece which he probably wrote in just a few minutes those years ago when he had the idea to write something about my daughters distress at finally leaving the nest. I think I posted after your comment that this song's audience will be family and friends and not pitched for today's country audience. I originally missed the mark on my musical decisions and just put this up on the forum for members to listen and offer suggestions before I complete the project.
I appreciate your comments.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693 |
Great suggestions Floyd. I'll spend some time auditioning electrics and FP guitars. I like the idea of shortening the intro. Alan also suggested adding a guitar so that may be a better fit for the chorus than the piano. But then, Rob also suggested adding a B4 Hammond. I'll give both a listen but am leaning to the guitar at this time. Rudy is a big fan of the pedal steel guitar and owns a nice early 60's model fender so I want the steel to be prominent in the song and that is why it originally had the outro length and sparseness of other instruments.
I really want to express my gratitude for you and all the other posters taking time to share your insight and knowledge.
Charlie
Last edited by c_fogle; 07/23/14 06:58 AM.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,693 |
Guenter, thanks for stopping by and listening. I do like the song and it is somewhat sentimental to me due to how it originated in the first place. I have received some great suggestions and tips and I'm getting excited about making some changes and hearing the final result.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Showcase
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,544
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,544 |
"...why it originally had the outro length and sparseness of other instruments."
I liked the outro - and its sparseness... I hope you keep that...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
The XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs special offers are now available until August 31st at 11:59pm PDT!
Ready to take your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 experience to the next level? Now’s the perfect time! Expand your style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs—packed with a wide variety of genres to inspire your next musical creation.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-9 includes 900 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). With over 3,500 styles (and 35 MIDI styles) included in Xtra Styles PAKs 1-20, the possibilities are endless!
Get the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Get Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 19 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Don’t miss this chance to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box setup—at a great price!
Mac 2025 Special Upgrade Offers Extended Until August 15th!
It's not too late to upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® and save! We've extended our special until August 15, 2025!
We've added many major new features to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, including advanced AI tools like the amazing BB Stem Splitter and AI Lyrics Generator, as well as VST3 plugin support, and Equalize Temp. Plus, there’s a new one-stop MIDI Patches Picker with over 1,100 MIDI patches to choose from, all neatly categorized by GM numbers. The MultiPicker Library is enhanced with tabs for the SongPicker, MIDI Patch Picker, Chord Builder, AI Lyrics Generator, and Song Titles Browser, and the tabs are organized into logical groups. The Audiophile Edition is enhanced with FLAC files , which are 60% smaller than AIFF files while maintaining identical audio quality, and now ships on a fast 1TB SSD, and much more!
Check out all the new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® here:
Purchase your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac during our special to save up to 50% off your upgrade purchase and receive a FREE BONUS PAK of amazing new Add-ons. These include the 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK, Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana, Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes, MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano, Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7, Playable RealTracks Set 4, RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark, and more!
Upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and add 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and 20 RealStyles, FLAC Files for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks, Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster, MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster, Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8, and RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe.
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs!
New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2025!
We’ve expanded the Band-in-a-Box® RealTracks library with 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 449-467) across Jazz, Blues, Funk, World, Pop, Rock, Country, Americana, and Praise & Worship—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Blues & World (Sets 449–455):
These RealTracks includes “Soul Jazz” with Neil Swainson (bass), Mike Clark (drums), Charles Treadway (organ), Miles Black (piano), and Brent Mason (guitar). Enjoy “Requested ’60s” jazz, classic acoustic blues with Colin Linden, and more of our popular 2-handed piano soloing. Plus, a RealTracks first—Tango with bandoneon, recorded in Argentina!
Rock & Pop (Sets 456–461):
This collection includes Disco, slap bass ‘70s/‘80s pop, modern and ‘80s metal with Andy Wood, and a unique “Songwriter Potpourri” featuring Chinese folk instruments, piano, banjo, and more. You’ll also find a muted electric guitar style (a RealTracks first!) and “Producer Layered Guitar” styles for slick "produced" sound.
Country, Americana & Praise (Sets 462–467):
We’ve added new RealTracks across bro country, Americana, praise & worship, vintage country, and songwriter piano. Highlights include Brent Mason (electric guitar), Eddie Bayers (drums), Doug Jernigan (pedal steel), John Jarvis (piano), Glen Duncan (banjo, mandolin & fiddle), Mike Harrison (electric bass) and more—offering everything from modern sounds to heartfelt Americana styles
Check out all the 202 New RealTracks (in sets 456-467)
And, if you are looking for more, the 2025 49-PAK (for $49) includes an additional 20 RealTracks with exciting new sounds and genre-spanning styles. Enjoy RealTracks firsts like Chinese instruments (guzheng & dizi), the bandoneon in an authentic Argentine tango trio, and the classic “tic-tac” baritone guitar for vintage country.
You’ll also get slick ’80s metal guitar from Andy Wood, modern metal with guitarist Nico Santora, bass player Nick Schendzielos, and drummer Aaron Stechauner, more praise & worship, indie-folk, modern/bro country with Brent Mason, and “Songwriter Americana” with Johnny Hiland.
Plus, enjoy user-requested styles like Soul Jazz RealDrums, fast Celtic Strathspey guitar, and Chill Hop piano & drums!
The 2025 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2025 49-PAK!
Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac!
With your version 2025 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Or upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2025 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 33 new RealTracks and 65+ new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 29 new RealTracks and 45+ new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 20 new RealStyles.
- Look Ma! More MIDI 13: Country & Americana
- Instrumental Studies Set 22: 2-Hand Piano Soloing - Rhythm Changes
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 44: Jazz Piano
- Artist Performance Set 17: Songs with Vocals 7
- Playable RealTracks Set 4
- RealDrums Stems Set 7: Jazz with Mike Clark
- SynthMaster Sounds and Styles (with audio demos)
- 128 GM MIDI Patch Audio Demos.
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyles,
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- Look Ma! More MIDI 14: SynthMaster,
- Instrumental Studies Set 23: More '80s Hard Rock Soloing,
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 45: More SynthMaster
- Artist Performance Set 18: Songs with Vocals 8
- RealDrums Stems Set 8: Pop, Funk & More with Jerry Roe
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®!
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Mac!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
New! XPro Styles PAK 9 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and higher for Mac!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 9 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 29 RealTracks/RealDrums!
We've been hard at it to bring you the latest and greatest in this 9th installment of our popular XPro Styles PAK series! Included are 75 styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres (25 styles each) that fans have come to expect, as well as 25 styles in this volume's wildcard genre: funk & R&B!
If you're itching to get a sneak peek at what's included in XPro Styles PAK 9, here is a small helping of what you can look forward to: Funky R&B Horns, Upbeat Celtic Rock, Jazz Fusion Salsa, Gentle Indie Folk, Cool '60s Soul, Funky '70s R&B, Smooth Jazz Hip Hop, Acoustic Rockabilly Swing, Funky Reggae Dub, Dreamy Retro Latin Jazz, Retro Soul-Rock Fusion, and much more!
Special Pricing! Until July 31, 2024, all the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 9 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
New! Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher for Windows!
Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest and greatest in the all new Xtra Styles PAK 20 for Band-in-a-Box! This fresh installment is packed with 200 all-new styles spanning the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres you've come to expect, as well as the exciting inclusion of electronic styles!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Minimalist Modern Funk, New Wave Synth Pop, Hard Bop Latin Groove, Gospel Country Shuffle, Cinematic Synthwave, '60s Motown, Funky Lo-Fi Bossa, Heavy 1980s Metal, Soft Muted 12-8 Folk, J-Pop Jazz Fusion, and many more!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 209 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 20.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 20 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 20 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,625
Posts781,946
Members39,707
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean