Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6
Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,675
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,675
Absolutely. Although my question referenced how supporters of the idea that steroids are too much of an advantage would apply that line of thought to musicians, I have wasted more money than I care to think about seeing a performance by a talented and competent artist too drunk to remember the lyrics to his own song. At the same time, there are artists who have lost fortunes to bad decisions made while under the influence of drugs/alcohol only to rehab and comeback and earn another fortune. It goes both ways.

In sports, it's not just steroids. Babe Ruth is nearly as famous for his strikeouts as he is for home runs. I have speculated by questioning was his strikeout record affected by him possibly playing a game either under the influence or hungover from too much drinking the night before to such a degree that his batting was affected. Pure speculation on my part, but also plausible. That's all I'm saying. Nobody that I'm aware of are suggesting that Babe Ruth or Micky Mantle's achievements should be altered because they were known to be heavy drinkers.

The comparison may not be equal but I see no harm in making such a comparison.

Last edited by c_fogle; 10/15/14 10:20 AM.

BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Actually, I was responding to your statement:


"... a musician who writes a hit song while under the influence of alcohol or drugs..."


Writing music and performing music are two entirely different things. In fact, a lot of great writers are lousy performers. That's why demo studios exist. grin

Also, many hits have been written under the influence of various substances. Cole Porter wrote some of the greatest lyrics ever written - all the while packing his nose with coke.

If I spend a lot of dough on concert tickets only to watch a drunk stumble through a set, do I feel cheated? Of course. But if that same person feels he can write better behind some weed or booze, who am I to tell him he can't?

I don't buy the sports analogy, because steroids are performance enhancing drugs, while narcotics and booze are detrimental to performing. (Unless you're the Dead, of course) grin

Off-Topic
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,492
Expert
Offline
Expert
Joined: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,492
Originally Posted By: 90 dB
You think they are comparable?

Curious. confused


Well, they don't achieve the results without additional help.


Desktop; i7-2600k, 8 GB mem., Win 10 Pro, BIAB 2017; RB 2017 - latest build
Laptop: i5-2410M, 4 GB mem, Win 10 Pro, BIAB 2017; RB 2017 - latest build
Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,790
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,790
Originally Posted By: Notes Norton

But I still maintain that using auto-tune is equivalent to an Olympic or Pro Athlete using steroids.

you could say the same thing about EQ! or about using a high-quality microphone vs. a megaphone! what about using FX and amplification on your guitar? or what about using BIAB backing tracks? it is all technology that we can use to improve our music.

Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Originally Posted By: GHinCH
Originally Posted By: 90 dB
You think they are comparable?

Curious. confused


Well, they don't achieve the results without additional help.




You're right. Brian Wilson never would have written any good songs without drugs. grin

Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,675
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,675
"...many hits have been written under the influence of various substances. Cole Porter wrote some of the greatest lyrics ever written - all the while packing his nose with coke."

Which is the basis of my original point. You stated it eloquently.

The question I ponder is why there is no similar discussion to ban musicians or revoke awards when it is determined an award winning song was written while the writer was "enhanced" like it is in sports?

I don't advocate that such an endeavor be started, but I have speculated on the question in the past.

Charlie


BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
"...many hits have been written under the influence of various substances. Cole Porter wrote some of the greatest lyrics ever written - all the while packing his nose with coke."

Which is the basis of my original point. You stated it eloquently.”



Actually, I have no doubt that Mr. Porter could have written quite well straight or under the influence. Are you seriously suggesting that Cole Porter's talent was due to his drug use, and that gave him some advantage over his competitors?


“The question I ponder is why there is no similar discussion to ban musicians or revoke awards when it is determined an award winning song was written while the writer was "enhanced" like it is in sports?”
I don't advocate that such an endeavor be started, but I have speculated on the question in the past.”



If you don't advocate banning musicians (whatever that is) or revoking awards, why did you bring it up? I sometimes “ponder” banning puritanical self-appointed judges, but of course, I don't advocate it. grin

Off-Topic
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Originally Posted By: c_fogle
"...many hits have been written under the influence of various substances. Cole Porter wrote some of the greatest lyrics ever written - all the while packing his nose with coke."

Which is the basis of my original point. You stated it eloquently.

The question I ponder is why there is no similar discussion to ban musicians or revoke awards when it is determined an award winning song was written while the writer was "enhanced" like it is in sports?

I don't advocate that such an endeavor be started, but I have speculated on the question in the past.

Charlie



Your analogy is fatally flawed Charlie. PED's significantly improve an athletes ability, strength and stamina.

Your comparison to drugs and alcohol doesn't fit.

Besides, if we started putting an asterisk beside every song written under the influence, then 99% of all music written would have one. Even the classical composers had reputations as party animals.

Last edited by bobcflatpicker; 10/15/14 01:02 PM. Reason: added one word
Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,675
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,675
"Your analogy is fatally flawed Charlie."
(That's probably very true, this is something I never spent any time or energy worrying about)


"PED's significantly improve an athletes ability and stamina.
Your comparison to drugs and alcohol doesn't fit."
(Many writers would argue this same point? Cocaine/whiskey/beer/uppers, etc significantly improve my ability to write songs and/or increase my stamina to work hours/days on such and such project, et al
So it fits)

"Besides, if we started putting an asterisk beside every song written under the influence, then 99% of all music written would have one. Even the classical composers had reputations as party animals."

(So, in essence, you are saying that 'everybody' does it which makes it a level playing field and likely could not be accomplished without such a crutch and because 'everybody' is included it is ok. So, in comparison, if PED's were allowed for all athletes, it would level the playing field and elevate the accomplishments of whatever sport is being played. Correct?)


BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Off-Topic
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
So you’ve acknowledged your analogy is probably flawed.

And then you say it isn’t flawed.

You’ve obviously got some kind of puritanical or religious axe to grind so there’s nothing anyone can say to get you to dump a bad analogy.

Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,675
C
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
C
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,675
Bob, you said my analogy is probably flawed, I didn't. I agree it may not be complete or may have some facts that have not been verified because I don't think think about the subject often or give it any merit to research and develop the idea any further. I personally don't think it is flawed and am sure I could justify my position beyond a reasonable doubt if the need arose. I personally don't have a dog in the fight, just an opinion. An opinion based on intellect and certainly not any puritanical or religious axe to grind. I have no axes to grind with anyone about anything. I will say I find those two references to be quite odd and uncalled for and seem to be somewhat personal and offensive rather than you choosing to offer a substantive reply. So I have no further comments on this subject as my opinion appears to bother you in some manner.


BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
Off-Topic
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Charlie,

You did say your analogy was probably flawed;

Quote:
"Your analogy is fatally flawed Charlie."
(That's probably very true, this is something I never spent any time or energy worrying about)


For a more “substantive reply”, I’ll offer this.

My 15 yr. old nephew was a scrawny high school freshman with no hope of actually getting to play football, but he did join the team. After 6 months he looked as if he could join the WWE. I asked him about the dramatic transformation and he told me it was steroids given to him by his high school coach. At the time I hadn’t even heard of steroids.

He went from being a bench warmer to being a starter thanks to his steroid use.

Alcohol and drugs don’t make people better musicians or writers. It actually has the opposite effect, especially if the drugs and alcohol are being used in the learning stages. Some people may think it enhances their ability to play or write, but usually when they look at the fruits of their labor when they’re stone cold sober, they see it’s not nearly as good as they thought the night before when they were buzzed.

When you look at the careers of aging successful writers and musicians who’ve abused drugs and alcohol, most would tell you that they had made it in spite of their addictions, not because of them. They’ll also tell you they do their best work when they’re “clean.”

Your insistence that the analogy worked made me think you had an axe to grind, and like you, I “speculated” as to the reason why.

Off-Topic
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
If you want me, I'll be at the bar. grin

Off-Topic
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,790
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,790
I have read accounts from songwriters who dropped acid and believed it helped them write better songs. There very well may be people who are more artistic when under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

So, in my opinion, Charlie's analogy worked just fine. I think where it might not hold up perfectly is it would be harder to document the effects of chemicals on the creative process than it is to prove the effects on the physical body.

Off-Topic
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,075
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,075
Originally Posted By: Notes Norton

But to become a famous singer with the help of auto-tune just seems wrong to me.

But it seems that I am in the minority.

Insights and incites by Notes

Nah, I don't think you're in the minority at all.
We just have a forum full of guys who like to play devil's advocate... wink

Off-Topic
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,075
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,075
Originally Posted By: bobcflatpicker

You’ve obviously got some kind of puritanical or religious axe to grind so there’s nothing anyone can say to get you to dump a bad analogy.


Bob, nobody brought up religion. If somebody in the discussion has an axe to grind, It isn't Charlie

Off-Topic
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Guilty as charged Pat. When I thought of "puritanical", then "religion" jumped to mind.

My bad.

Off-Topic
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 4,251
This whole discussion about AT, Melodyne, backing tracks and other electronic gizmos reminds me of the “Wizard Of Oz”.

When Dorothy and her stalwart friends finally make it into the inner chamber to see the Great and Powerful OZ, they are in shock and awe at the thunder, lightning, flames and the booming voice that encompassed them.

Then the curtain is accidentally pulled back and they realize it’s all just some old fart pushing buttons and pulling levers.

Off-Topic
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,028
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,028
Who cares as Tv's judge Judy would say a "rats behind" if anyone uses melodyne autotune or are the worst singers in the world, if the end product sounds good using these products. Good luck to them!

Have we all forgotton that we use biab ourselves to help us make the music, even some people on the forum release cd's with only biab backing track.

musiclover


Off-Topic
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,374
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 6,374
Playing or writing songs when drunk or on psychedelics has nothing to do with my point.

Steroids can give an inferior athlete the ability to beat a superior athlete. That's what my analogy was all about.

And I can think of a number of singers who can't sing their way out of a paper bag without auto-tune. It's not that they are inferior singers, but not singers at all, Taylor Swift, Ke$ha and so many others.

I heard the Britney Spears cut that was smuggled out of the recording studio before auto-tune. In the entire song, if she hit two notes on pitch, it would have been a coincidence. If you wanted an audio definition of either tone deaf or sour notes, that would be it.

And EQ, amplification and other FX are not the same thing. Echo, reverb, EQ all recreate natural environments. At one time they used tiled 'echo chambers' for the same effect. If you hit a note a half step flat, no EQ or other FX will fix it, only Auto-Tune or a competitor.

I mentioned Bob Dylan, probably one of the worst singers in rock and roll history. At least he was honest about it. And I started imagining what Bob would sound like with auto-tune, and I decided, definitely much worse. As bad as Dylan sings, he uses pitch for expression, and that's the only redeeming quality of his performances.

So I'm old fashioned. If you can't sing, you should be a famous singer.

When I hear the auto-tune artifacts, I change the radio station - and can't do it quickly enough.

To me when I hear auto-tune, that tells me that person cannot sing, is a fraud, and is denying the world the plearure an Aretha Franklin, Ella Fitzgerald, Mark Murphy, Tom Jones, Elvis Presley, Frank Sinatra, Sheena Easton, Brook Benton, Lou Rawls equivalent a chance at that pop fame - and they are doing it by fraudulent cheating.

Now I know the world isn't fair, and connections have always been more important than talent, but IMHO this auto-tune takes things way too far.

That's my opinion anyway FWIW.

Insights and incites by Notes


Bob "Notes" Norton smile Norton Music
https://www.nortonmusic.com

100% MIDI Super-Styles recorded by live, pro, studio musicians for a live groove
& Fake Disks for MIDI and/or RealTracks
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 3 of 6 1 2 3 4 5 6

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support

Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins

Join the conversation on our forum.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac Videos

With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.

From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.

Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Mac Videos — we’ll be adding more videos as they’re released!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac is Here!

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!

Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.

2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.

If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!

Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.

Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.

Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano

Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!

Bonjour à tous,

Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music

Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:

BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation

Voilà, enjoy!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!

Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!

Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!

Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:

https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025.exe
https://nn.pgmusic.com/pgfiles/languagesupport/deutsch2025RB.exe

Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!

Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.

Stay up to date—get the latest update now!

Forum Statistics
Forums58
Topics84,297
Posts777,426
Members39,614
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
weedindubai, Claudio Paolini, bjornen71, CATBELLOU, Banjopotamus
39,613 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 144
zedd 120
DC Ron 105
nonchai 104
WaoBand 102
rsdean 86
Today's Birthdays
earl kirby, Guitarman 2
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5