|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780
Expert
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780 |
Hope I don't get jumped on - its fine others disagree....
I find PG's development very worrying. As I have said in other posts its like a raft cobbled together, but supporting some fantastic innovations.
I really want PG to succeed.
So please, development team sit back, relax, take a look at the GUI in BIAB, then check out the products that are actually in use by the younger generation. Frankly they are slicker, more functional and more intuitive. I have just been assessing Cubase 8 for example, its no contest, funny, the update is cheaper than BIAB too. Cubase is a case in point, its a granddaddy of a program too but its super fit, looks so young and lean and is so powerful.
If I was 18 years olds and looking for a new program, would I really settle on a program with a distinct windows 95 look, no trial offer, no free version.
Would I use it for loops when I can get Fruity Loops? Its no environment for this sort of work - really, if we are to be honest.
Real Tracks are fantastic. BIAB's MIDI functionality is powerful but very very dated. To an 18 year old BIAB must look like some form of historical document.
It needs to be said
Z
Last edited by ZeroZero; 12/03/14 10:04 PM.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 174
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 174 |
Hi ZeroZero: I'm not trying to start a "war" but I have to disagree. The GUI has really been enhanced a lot esp. with 2015. And I'm really glad that they didn't overhaul it so much that you couldn't find the regular functions, and that would mean "starting" all over again.
And there is a new course from Groove3.com re: BIAB 2014. I was thinking while watching it that this will appeal to the younger generation. Just a coincidence to your thoughts.
Just my opinion.
Cheers.
Last edited by soolan; 12/04/14 04:57 AM. Reason: added text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,787
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 22,787 |
Hi ZeroZero,
That was very well stated and I agree 100%. It is time for a complete re-write.
Sonar went through some huge growing pains when it went from 8.5 to X1 and at that time almost everyone complained about the workflow change. Now with X3 most all agree that it was for the best, in fact I find the X series much easier to use than the Sonar 2-8.5 work flow. I am sure that the same thing will happen with a compete re-write of BiaB.
When you are at the checkout line and they ask if you found everything say "Why, are you hiding stuff?"
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,879
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,879 |
The major GUI changes to BIAB occurred more last year, and it's a good work still in progress. I thoroughly love BIAB. I don't have a problem with MIDI implementation in BIAB; MIDI is itself a very dated standard in need of a rewrite. Music XML support would go a long way there, and BIAB is so close already.
I think Mario's comments about SONAR are instructive. SONAR 8.5 was at least a reasonably contemporary interface to start with. We managed to adapt to the X series and I finally have deleted 8.5 from my computer. I would be pleased to purchase an upgrade to BIAB if it had nothing new except these three things: fully 64-bit, a reworked user interface that adopted standard Windows functions throughout, and a redesigned menu system and dialog boxes. Of course, doing this would be a massive effort, but it would position BIAB better for the future.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,540
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,540 |
I also agree. In my opinion, BIAB needs a serious GUI redesing, I would be really happy purchasing a BIAB upgrade if it had only a new, more functional user interface.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780 |
Soolan, its fine you disagree, but I also disagree with your disagree  I have been using Cubase for more than 20 years. Every now and again there is a radical rewrite, functions are dropped but power is enhanced. Frankly, what we call an 'enhanced' gui are things like allowing a banjo to be called a banjo or adding a basic mixer - a decade or so after they should have done this. The whole program is way behind, it still looks dated. You can pay up to 669 dollars for BIAB whereas Cubase is 606 dollars for top product. The updates are more expensive than Cubases too. I was very unimpressed by this update, with the exception of the real tracks. I don't think that most of the '50 new features' rank as new features, they are mostly the sort of thing other software companies build into a free update. Again I say I wat PG to improve, that's why it needs a reality check Z
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,879
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,879 |
What I like about this thread is, it is positive. Opinions are respected. Very good; we all want the best for PG Music.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780 |
Matt: Don't know about Sonar, so cant comment on their user's journey.
Last edited by ZeroZero; 12/04/14 07:39 AM.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,231
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,231 |
I especially agree that the menus need to be revisited. The selection of instruments, VST's, and routing of data is difficult to comprehend, unintuitive, and often there is a requirement to go to many different menus to configure this.
It seriously needs a routing diagram that clearly shows exactly what is going where.
From what I can see, the User Interface changes/enhancements this time around are indeed minimal. A year is a long time to wait for an update, and there are lots of expectations, with a possibly disappointing delivered result.
ZZ is exactly correct. Other products are definitely offering more appeal. We want this product to do the same, and not get left behind.
Trevor
BIAB & RB2025 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,879
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,879 |
Zero, SONAR is a great program, similar in function to Cubase. Mario covered the important point here, about their decision to do a complete user interface overhaul. It has certainly paid off for them, in my opinion.
[I have only one gripe: they took away the Save button.]
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,261
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 5,261 |
Maybe the usual market laws are at work here. I don't see anywhere some competing software providing similar features like BiaB. There are zillions of sequencers and DAWs out there, though.
Martin
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,417
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,417 |
I would just love to see the broken things fixed once and for all. As far as the cost for BIAB vs Cubase, i think the price difference is due to the RTS
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2025, Realband, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 9 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780 |
Maybe the usual market laws are at work here. I don't see anywhere some competing software providing similar features like BiaB. There are zillions of sequencers and DAWs out there, though. Hi Martin Yes the market is ruling, if your the only supplier, then you can charge what you like - simple.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780 |
I think the price difference is due to the RTS
The real tracks are excellent no doubt - superb some of them, but maybe the price difference cant be explained by this....Cubase develops all the time at ten times the speed, they also give away numerous loops and samples, not to mention very decent free instruments and effects. The very new update from C7.5 to C8 pro is a case in point, a real step change, and looking so slick Z
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,417
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,417 |
Yeah Z i hear ya, but RTs are not simple loops samples, or VSTis, they are paid musician's recordings. I am sure they cost a pretty penny to make. Still that is where PG has chosen to place their development dollar/pound/peso/rupee!?!?
BiaB an't hope to catch up to Cubase, one of the oldest and most developed DAW packages on the market. Especially since BiaB is not a DAW per se it is a different cat. Cubase/Sonar/Protools are all fighting to be the recording studio DAW of choice. BiaB is not in that race, it is a tool to use for musicians to learn/develop/teach/and design song beds and such. They even include a basic DAW to keep that evolution going. But neither are slated to be full Studio DAW systems.
But i will say your point is very well stated, in that the younger crowd likes the traditional DAW environment better. It works like they think. I will say that when i have shown it to young friends they were blown away by it's capability, but it seemed not to be their way of working.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2025, Realband, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 9 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 20
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 20 |
Zerozero:
It is your opinion and I wonder what source you are getting your demographics from.
The first thing you need to completely understand is that BIAB is NOT a DAW. Making comparisons to Cubase, Sonar, Protools, Studio one or any other multitrack Digital RECORDING software is an innane comparison. Different purposes, different software.
The real magic is that BIAB integrates seamlessly with your DAW of choice ... as an instrument not a recording tool. That's pretty awesome and, to be frank, the only one of it's kind!
So go ahead and use you favorite DAW to record, but MAKE music with BIAB.
Finally, this topic is for posting specfic ideas that will improve the BIAB experience. If you wish to vent your diappointment and misunderstanding of what you purchased, please take your opinion to the " Off topic" forum.
Last edited by Ron95; 12/04/14 02:26 PM.
Ron95
As a teacher, Experience often begins the first lesson with the final exam.
BIAB user since 1990 - Yes, I really am that old!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827 |
I agree with all of that, but sometimes I feel like Jack
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,778
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,778 |
It is your opinion and I wonder what source you are getting your demographics from. You really don't need to have much data to understand that software with a Windows 95/3.1 era interface will be a tough sell to the younger generation! And this is not just a "those dang kids today" moment. The newer software GUIs are just better! MUCH better! Both in their look & feel and in their functionality. Those of us who LOVE what BIAB can do for us still admit that! The first thing you need to completely understand is that BIAB is NOT a DAW. Making comparisons to Cubase, Sonar, Protools, Studio one or any other multitrack Digital RECORDING software is an innane comparison. Different purposes, different software. Nope. When discussing music software tools it is absolutely appropriate to compare to other state-of-the-art music software tools. Great GUI is great GUI regardless of the program you are using! The real magic is that BIAB integrates seamlessly with your DAW of choice Well, "seamless" has a definition! When I open Kontakt inside Reaper...now that is seamless. But, as great as BIAB is (and IT IS GREAT), creating tracks and exporting them to MIDI or WAV files and then importing those into my DAW is anything but seamless! Yeah, it works but it ain't that slick in this day and age! So go ahead and use you favorite DAW to record, but MAKE music with BIAB. I certainly agree with you here. But, the conversation was not "we CAN'T make music with these tools" rather it was "how can BIAB be improved?" Finally, this topic is for posting specfic ideas that will improve the BIAB experience. If you wish to vent your diappointment and misunderstanding of what you purchased, please take your opinion to the " Off topic" forum. Quite the contrary, this is the perfect forum for this conversation. The GUI needs improvement so the wishlist is the best place to talk about this! I do not mean to sound all negative as I LOVE, LOVE, LOVE this product!!! But if we can encourage PG to improve the GUI it is a win for all of us, especially PG as their market would grow overnight!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,827 |
John, John and John you all nailed it again, thank you. Sometimes I just want to give up like Jack, I think I'm too outspoken, maybe I should not say anything for fear of offending. Then you get others that come along and SEE the same things, it gives you hope to keep going
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780
Expert
|
|
OP
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,780 |
I'm with John John, I think it's valid to make a comparison to other music applications, obviously their different, but you can compare.
One of my points is that Cubase is obviously more powerful has more development and is cheaper. Its not just features bolted on to its original MIDI sequencer architecture.
Cubase has been around for a long while yes, but so has BIAB. Cubase periodically has a ground up redesign, BIAB patches bits on.
Biab still crashes more than any other application I own, I keep away from large parts of the program (like notation) because they don't seem to work here. RB is so bad I don't even go near it. Yes, it can do one thing I really need and do this excellently.
As I said in another thread, its thirteen years since Windows became 64 bit. What is trumpeted by PG is an update that makes us pay for a compromise application Jbridge, made by another company. I have spent a lot of time avoiding Jbridge in Cubase and now use it for only one task, its not a professional solution.
Taking aside the real tracks and loops, I don't see major development in BIAB 2015. There are some things like speedier loading of song lists, that are very welcome, and even labelling of instruments accurately. But for me the gui has hardly changed, these IMO are minor tweaks like adding a short cut to the tutorial videos or adding an algorithm to check for updates, or adding a feature to email a song (why? why not simply attach it?). Many of the "fifty new features" are overstated (IMO!).
That's not to say there is not a lot to like about PG (and you guys that disagree).
Z
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Holiday Weekend Hours
Our Customer Service hours this weekend are as follows:
Friday, April 18: 8:00 - 4:00
Saturday, April 19: closed
Sunday, April 20: closed
Monday, April 21: Regular hours
Thank you!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
Update to RealBand® 2025 Build 5 Windows Today!
Already using RealBand® 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 5 now from our Support Page to ensure you have the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Get the latest update today!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 is here! This new version introduces many features, including VST3 support, the ability to load or import a .FLAC file, a reset option for track height in the Tracks window, a taller Timeline on the Notation window toolbar, new freeze buttons in the Tracks window, three toolbar modes (two rows, single row, and none), the improved Select Patch dialog with text-based search and numeric patch display, a new button in the DirectX/VST window to copy an effects group, and more!
First-time packages start at only $49. Already a PowerTracks Pro Audio user? Upgrade for as little as $29!
www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm
Video: Summary of the New Band-in-a-Box® App for iOS®
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new Band-in-a-Box® app for iOS®! Designed for musicians, singer-songwriters, and educators, this powerful tool lets you create, play, and transfer songs effortlessly on your iPhone® or iPad®—anytime, anywhere.
Band-in-a-Box® for iOS® :Summary video.
Check out the forum post for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics83,888
Posts771,819
Members39,475
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean