Hope I don't get jumped on - its fine others disagree....

I find PG's development very worrying. As I have said in other posts its like a raft cobbled together, but supporting some fantastic innovations.

I really want PG to succeed.

So please, development team sit back, relax, take a look at the GUI in BIAB, then check out the products that are actually in use by the younger generation. Frankly they are slicker, more functional and more intuitive. I have just been assessing Cubase 8 for example, its no contest, funny, the update is cheaper than BIAB too. Cubase is a case in point, its a granddaddy of a program too but its super fit, looks so young and lean and is so powerful.

If I was 18 years olds and looking for a new program, would I really settle on a program with a distinct windows 95 look, no trial offer, no free version.
Would I use it for loops when I can get Fruity Loops? Its no environment for this sort of work - really, if we are to be honest.

Real Tracks are fantastic. BIAB's MIDI functionality is powerful but very very dated. To an 18 year old BIAB must look like some form of historical document.



It needs to be said


Z

Last edited by ZeroZero; 12/03/14 10:04 PM.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k