Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3
Newbie
|
OP
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3 |
Hi, first post here, I've been doing home recording for many years with various DAWS and have the non audiophile version of BB. A question in general: As an example, if I take a drum part that was generated by BB exported it as a WAV file and imported it to my DAW and did this for both the Audiophile and non-Audiophile version, would I hear a noticible difference in quality between the two versions? thanks, I'm trying to decide if I should get the Audiophile version. I'd have no problem purchasing if the quality if better.
Randy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
"As an example, if I take a drum part that was generated by BB exported it as a WAV file and imported it to my DAW and did this for both the Audiophile and non-Audiophile version, would I hear a noticible difference in quality between the two versions?"
In a word - yes. Especially the cymbals, but the stick hits as well. The difference in the Audiophile version and the standard is subtle, but noticable.
Edit: I assume that you in particular would hear the difference, since you have been recording for a while. If you're doing any serious work, the Audiophile is a no-brainer.
Regards,
Bob
Last edited by 90 dB; 02/16/15 12:12 PM. Reason: Edit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,320
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 15,320 |
Unless you are, like me, one of the oldest pharts on the board and destroyed your high frequency hearing decades ago in which case mp3's rendered from the standard version sound great. 
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos are here on our website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,732 |
Welcome to the forums Randy. This is a common question on the forums. I've linked one of the past posts in which Solidrock provided a Spectrum Analysis between the two versions so you can see the difference.... Audiophile Version
 Steve BIAB/RB 2022, Pro Tools 2020, Korg N5, JBL LSR 4328 Powered Monitors, AKG/Shure Mics. PC: Win11 PRO, 4 TB M2 SSD, 2 TB HD, 128 GB Memory
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,971
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 26,971 |
There is a lot of info in that good thread Steve just linked to. My advice there remains unchanged.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3
Newbie
|
OP
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 3 |
Thanks for the welcome and the information. This does help,gives me a couple of different viewpoints.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,269
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,269 |
Will you hear a difference?
depends on your ears and the speakers you are using.
Most here have the basic version... not the audiophile version and it sounds pretty good. I like to drop the files into my DAW and enhance them with EQ and other such things....
The quality you can get from the regular version and a bit of tweeking with plugs is good enough to get you into the major film & TV libraries with broadcast quality recordings..... how much better does it really need to be?
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,286
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,286 |
I started off with the standard versions. The sound is, as you know, quite good.
I did a lot of research before switching to and investing in Audiophile. In my view this has been a worthwhile decision. The high's certainly definitely come through that slightly bit 'crisper' than before. This is identified in SR's tests also.
Everyone will have a different take. Some people swear you cannot tell the difference. Put Standard in the left channel and Audiophile in the right, and I believe that most people can tell the difference. If your material is only used live in a crowded bar, then you won't see a benefit. If it's used for broadcast / advertising situations, you will be able to notice the distinction.
Oh, and P.S. : Welcome to the forum!
BIAB & RB2025 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 9
Newbie
|
Newbie
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 9 |
the answear is yes I cab hear the diffrence. Not everywhere but especially in guitar music.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,430
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 2,430 |
VideoTrack makes a good point. A friend of mine has the audiophile version, I have the standard version. We frequently trade files back and forth as we work in each others home studios. He gigs on the outside, while I work exclusively in the studio. His home setup makes use of mixing boards and PA's, while mine is all digital and uses 8" reference monitors. We both feel that mine sounds a bit better, but we agree it's not the BIAB version we're using, it's the type of equipment driving the sound. YMMV.
Jeff
Win11, Intel i7 7700K 4.2Ghz, 32Gb RAM, 2x1Tb HD, 500Gb NVMe, BIAB/RB 2025, MOTU 828MK3 audio, MOTU Midi Express, Yamaha Montage 7, DX7II, TX802, Motif XS Rack, Roland Fantom XR Rack, Oberheim Matrix 1000, VoiceLive3 Extreme, Kontakt 6, SampleTank 4.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,286
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,286 |
VideoTrack makes a good point. A friend of mine has the audiophile version, I have the standard version. We frequently trade files back and forth as we work in each others home studios. He gigs on the outside, while I work exclusively in the studio. His home setup makes use of mixing boards and PA's, while mine is all digital and uses 8" reference monitors. We both feel that mine sounds a bit better, but we agree it's not the BIAB version we're using, it's the type of equipment driving the sound. YMMV.
Jeff Quote: YMMV That's exactly the point! Takes more than just the Audiophile version to make it work properly.
BIAB & RB2025 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
Update to RealBand® 2025 Build 5 Windows Today!
Already using RealBand® 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 5 now from our Support Page to ensure you have the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Get the latest update today!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks Pro Audio 2025 is here! This new version introduces many features, including VST3 support, the ability to load or import a .FLAC file, a reset option for track height in the Tracks window, a taller Timeline on the Notation window toolbar, new freeze buttons in the Tracks window, three toolbar modes (two rows, single row, and none), the improved Select Patch dialog with text-based search and numeric patch display, a new button in the DirectX/VST window to copy an effects group, and more!
First-time packages start at only $49. Already a PowerTracks Pro Audio user? Upgrade for as little as $29!
www.pgmusic.com/powertracks.htm
Video: Summary of the New Band-in-a-Box® App for iOS®
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new Band-in-a-Box® app for iOS®! Designed for musicians, singer-songwriters, and educators, this powerful tool lets you create, play, and transfer songs effortlessly on your iPhone® or iPad®—anytime, anywhere.
Band-in-a-Box® for iOS® :Summary video.
Check out the forum post for more information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,116
Posts775,459
Members39,583
|
Most Online25,754 Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|