Originally Posted By: ZeroZero
Hi Pat,

With respect...

I was talking about the gui (again) not the program. I think BIAB can learn from photoshop too but this does not mean I claim that it should be 'like' photoshop, only that the gui could learn from some of its features and be slicker.

For the record I am passionate about BIAB, but I am very worried that its not keeping up. This much is seems obvious to many, though some want it like it is.

Z

Hi Z...
My question was rhetorical rather than being a challenge.

The point I was trying to make is that when products of equal ability compete, the one that looks best wins. But if you bring something to the table that the competition simply doesn't have.. then looks become secondary. This principle has enabled homely rich men to get pretty wives throughout history.

Interesting theory.. but does it translate into reality? The last time I saw numbers reporting market share for the various music making programs, BIAB was listed higher than a lot of well known programs that are being used here as favorable examples to emulate. But... BIAB already has more market share then they do... so something in this argument doesn't add up.

https://www.dropbox.com/sh/ey71h8ep047758h/AAC12jNM0Hz9Q8zsh5iDeqNHa?dl=0