|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891 |
When I use the soloist and select a RealTrack is that the same result as just assigning that same RealTrack to the Soloist track? Or is there something different going on in how the part is generated?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,495
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,495 |
John, If you use the Soloist function to select a Realtrack, you have a little more control. For example, it's possible to use the "Custom" button and have the solo play a specific range of bars. Assigning a solo by RT picker to any of the tracks will put it on that track for the duration of the song. (Bar settings will allow a user to bring it in an out of the playback as he or she wishes.) Hope this helps, Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891 |
John, If you use the Soloist function to select a Realtrack, you have a little more control. For example, it's possible to use the "Custom" button and have the solo play a specific range of bars. Assigning a solo by RT picker to any of the tracks will put it on that track for the duration of the song. (Bar settings will allow a user to bring it in an out of the playback as he or she wishes.) Hope this helps, Noel Thanks Noel! I see how you get a little more control with Soloist and I get how assigning it to a track means it generates for the entire track (until you turn it on/off by bar setting) but I was wondering if the generation of the solo part is any different using Soloist. I guess I could experiment with this. I also wonder if the solo generated is any different due to it being generated on the Soloist track as opposed to another track? For example, other than the natural differences you would get from each generation of a RealTrack, would the following techniques yield the same or different results? 1) I create a 4 bar song with a single chorus. 2) I assign a RealStyle to my song. 3) On the second track (default Piano track), I assign "809: Guitar, Electric, Soloist DrivingCountryBallad Ev 065 (Audley Freed)" 4) On the Soloist track I assign the same track as #3 using the Style picker 5) Generate 6) Will both tracks that are assigned 809 be comparable or is the Soloist track generated differently? 7) Delete the 809 from the Soloist track 8) Open Soloist dialog and assign 809 to the entire song 9) Generate 10) Will both tracks that are assigned 809 be comparable or is the Soloist track generated differently? Also, a follow up question...is the generated track affected in any way by the style that has been chosen?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,908
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,908 |
wondering if the generation of the solo part is any different using Soloist. - No.
wonder if the solo generated is any different due to it being generated on the Soloist track as opposed to another track?
- No.
Also, a follow up question...is the generated track affected in any way by the style that has been chosen?
I assume you are referring to RTs over a "Midi Style". This has been debated here before. I am of the opinion that the answer, except for tempo and key, is No the RT's are not impacted by the Style. RT only play what is recorded. But I may be wrong 
BIAB – 2026, Reaper (current), i7-12700F Processor, 32GB DDR4-3200MHz RAM, Motu Audio Express 6x6 - My SoundCloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,944
PG Music Staff
|
|
PG Music Staff
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 15,944 |
Yes, generating a solo on the Soloist track (using the Soloist dialog) is different in a few ways.
1. You can generate a solo over a certain range (for example 4 bars starting at bar 1 chorus 2.
2. You can regenerate other solos on the same track, including completely different instruments with different tempos.
3. You can use features like 'trade 4's' to determine where the soloing happens.
4. There are MIDI soloists available too (range of #s are 1-360 for the MIDI soloists). Higher than 360 are RealTracks.
Have Fun!
Peter Gannon
PG Music Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891 |
Yes, generating a solo on the Soloist track (using the Soloist dialog) is different in a few ways.
1. You can generate a solo over a certain range (for example 4 bars starting at bar 1 chorus 2.
2. You can regenerate other solos on the same track, including completely different instruments with different tempos.
3. You can use features like 'trade 4's' to determine where the soloing happens.
4. There are MIDI soloists available too (range of #s are 1-360 for the MIDI soloists). Higher than 360 are RealTracks. Thanks Peter! Those Soloist controls are really awesome for sure. But I was wondering if the end result, the generated segment of music, would be different or essentially the same. To clarify, I guess I am curious if using the Soloist enables some different algorithm so the generated segment matches better or otherwise "fits" the section of the song better than if I simply added a solo RealTrack and let BIAB generate along with the other tracks. I think maybe to further clarify, I have always assumed BIAB chooses better "starting" phrases at the beginning of a section as opposed to the middle of a section. If that is true I would therefore assume that using Soloist for a section is better than assigning a solo RT to a track and then using bar settings to turn it on and off at the various places I want the solo to occur. Or maybe the RT generator just does its magic without regard for whether it is a Soloist controlled section or just a solo RT assigned to a track?
Last edited by JohnJohnJohn; 05/25/15 08:01 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891 |
OK, I am not sure if I am communicating my question effectively! So let me try with two examples,
1) a song NOT using Soloist
-I create a 16 bar song and choose a Realstyle
-I want a solo at 5-8 and again at 13-16
-I assign a solo RT to an unused track
-using bar settings, I mute the solo RT track at 1-4 and 9-12
-again using bar settings I "return to normal" the solo RT track at 5-8 and 13-16
-generate the song
2) a song that IS using Soloist
-I create a 16 bar song and choose a Realstyle
-I want a solo at 5-8 and again at 13-16
-I use Soloist to set up the same solo RT at 5-8 and again at 13-16
-generate the song
My question in a nutshell is...Are the generated results different/better in either of the two scenarios above? I definitely understand that the setup effort can be improved using Soloist but is the end result different/better?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,281 |
Not entirely sure since on Peter's answer there are a couple of things I was not aware of, but, I dare say no, the end result it's probably the same whatever method you use to generate the RT solo.
Mike B.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,908
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,908 |
JJJ, I think we understand your question and several have now answered.
You have been around for a while and know as well as many, there are multiple ways to do the same thing in BIAB. Some of those ways provide different options along the way, but in the end the output is the same. The soloist menu and the F5 for setting who plays what and when are a perfect example of this.
But, maybe some of this is before your time, that is, before we had RTs doing our solos. Back in the old days, the Soloist feature was applied only to midi soloists and only on the Soloist track. At that time you could choose a soloist in the "style of ...", and the midi engine would create it - trade 4's and rotate multiple soloists on the same track. This may have even been before F5, although I may be forgetting things as this would go back almost a decade.
Then RTs came along with dedicated soloist recordings. So a RT soloist could be placed on any track. Combining that with F5 pretty much made the Soloist feature obsolete for RTs.
However, the RT solos were added to the Soloist menu. Many of the original features did not apply when using RTs and I believe they may not to this day. But you know how BIAB likes to have multiple ways to do the same things...
Hope that helps. I fully appreciate that BIAB can be a bit of a sticky wicket and is difficult to fully comprehend but I think my understanding is not too far off the mark. Some things you only learn by being around a long long time.
Good luck.
BIAB – 2026, Reaper (current), i7-12700F Processor, 32GB DDR4-3200MHz RAM, Motu Audio Express 6x6 - My SoundCloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891 |
JJJ, I think we understand your question and several have now answered.
You have been around for a while and know as well as many, there are multiple ways to do the same thing in BIAB. Some of those ways provide different options along the way, but in the end the output is the same. The soloist menu and the F5 for setting who plays what and when are a perfect example of this.
But, maybe some of this is before your time, that is, before we had RTs doing our solos. Back in the old days, the Soloist feature was applied only to midi soloists and only on the Soloist track. At that time you could choose a soloist in the "style of ...", and the midi engine would create it - trade 4's and rotate multiple soloists on the same track. This may have even been before F5, although I may be forgetting things as this would go back almost a decade.
Then RTs came along with dedicated soloist recordings. So a RT soloist could be placed on any track. Combining that with F5 pretty much made the Soloist feature obsolete for RTs.
However, the RT solos were added to the Soloist menu. Many of the original features did not apply when using RTs and I believe they may not to this day. But you know how BIAB likes to have multiple ways to do the same things...
Hope that helps. I fully appreciate that BIAB can be a bit of a sticky wicket and is difficult to fully comprehend but I think my understanding is not too far off the mark. Some things you only learn by being around a long long time.
Good luck.
Thanks! I have seen things in BIAB in my short time here where commands and features seem to be valid but are actually left-overs from MIDI as you point out. And I guess I am trying to see if that is the case here. I am hoping for a simple answer from PG on this one and my examples were provided to try and be as unambiguous as possible! And I guess your post raises additional questions like does the trade 4s option work with RealTracks?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,495
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,495 |
John, Peter Gannon specifically mentions the 'Trade 4' option as point #3. Apparently this does work with RTs. In your two scenarios above, I use both options regularly. When I create a song, if I have an instrumental section (usually 8 bars), then I use the Soloist dialogue and generate and regenerate the solo over those 8 bars. I do this because 8 bars generate much quicker than a whole song. This makes it much easier for me to test multiple generations and multiple RTs. If any standout generations occur along the way, I always save those for potential later use. When I settle on the RT that I think most suited, I then place it on a track and generate it for the entire length of the song. Because I assemble my songs in Reaper, I prefer having a full length audio file because it gives me greater control; it's also a source of additional soloist material that I can copy and paste and thread through the mix. At the end of my process, I have not found any differences between which way the solo is generated. Regards, Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,088
Posts800,044
Members40,031
| |
Most Online44,367
Mar 4th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean