|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,918
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2011
Posts: 10,918 |
The statement below was found in the notes for a beginning mixing class. Agree or disagree and why?
Recording/mixing at well below max level (-10 dBFS to -20 dBFS) allows for louder and cleaner masters. After all, the end product is what matters most. The old axiom of “use up all the bits” no longer applies in the age of 24-bit recordings and gear with lower noise floors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,751
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,751 |
The statement below was found in the notes for a beginning mixing class. Agree or disagree and why?
Recording/mixing at well below max level (-10 dBFS to -20 dBFS) allows for louder and cleaner masters. After all, the end product is what matters most. The old axiom of “use up all the bits” no longer applies in the age of 24-bit recordings and gear with lower noise floors. It's a true statement but is more applicable to a beginner mixer. A good, clean recording at a higher level will require less, if any effects such as compression, eq and limiting to bring the dynamics up to level. It's always better to get the recording right than to fix it during post. With beginning mixer, it's also better to be safe than sorry so there is something to work with if the artist is gone and the recording is crud.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,662
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,662 |
Disagree:
You want to have the levels set just far enough down so that you don't exceed 0dB and venture into clipping. -6dB for peaks is fine. But you could push it up further if you needed to. I tend to work around -3dB on peaks.
If you record too low, yes, you can turn it up, but, when you do, you also turn up the noise and hiss that is in the track. As you turn it up, you raise the noise floor as well. -20dB is way down. That level is lower than where I run my vocal doubling secondary tracks and you can't hear them unless you solo the vocal buss. They are not recorded at that level..... they are recorded up just under 0dB, but I pull the faders back for the final mix.
You want to have the strongest signal level going in that you can possibly get without clipping. That keeps the source material well above the noise floor.
I prefer to have nice strong levels in the tracks and then pull them down for the final mix if that's needed, rather than going the other way.
Just my 2 cents
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,751
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,751 |
I agree Herb. I try for around -6 db too.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,330
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,330 |
Well.... We all have our particular recording protocols that work for us.
For me...I've always recorded individual tracks to about -12db...give or take a couple....and I've never had any level issues at any stage. Therefore, I see no benefit in recording at a higher input level.
Back in 2010 I'd sent (3) of my tunes to be mastered at Buffalo Sound (now called the The Ranch I think). He said to send all raw tracks at -12db. (He also added lead axe and B3 tracks which was very cool)
Most of us are in the digital realm so noise should not be a big issue as far as recording levels. So...that recommended level (-12db) has more to do with the head room comfort necessary with summing of all tracks along with FX/signal processing at the stereo mix. If you're using tape, different story, then as close to 0db is best but you can even push that level in the tape realm without issues.
If the end result has been achieved regardless of the path chosen all is well.
That's my take on it. Carry on....
Last edited by chulaivet1966; 09/20/15 03:40 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,085 |
IF you are using plugins that emulate vintage hardware and you are recording/mixing in 24bit, then the "sweet spot" is said to be -18dbfs and it's suggested to use the trim on your DAW (or a trim plugin first in your fx chain) since the signal is prefader going into the plugins. This is from Graham at the Recording Revolution: http://therecordingrevolution.com/2013/11/25/do-you-know-how-to-read-your-meters/And I've read long discussions about that from some other places too. But personally, I just keep the peaks somewhere between -12 and -6. I use Realtracks and rarely record anything other than vocals. And i found the above advice (-18dbfs)to not work well for me mixing with the FX I use. YMMV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,199
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,199 |
Jim,
Thanks for starting this thread. I'm finding it very interesting reading.
Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,199
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,199 |
IF you are using plugins that emulate vintage hardware and you are recording/mixing in 24bit, then the "sweet spot" is said to be -18dbfs and it's suggested to use the trim on your DAW (or a trim plugin first in your fx chain) since the signal is prefader going into the plugins. This is from Graham at the Recording Revolution: http://therecordingrevolution.com/2013/11/25/do-you-know-how-to-read-your-meters/And I've read long discussions about that from some other places too. But personally, I just keep the peaks somewhere between -12 and -6. I use Realtracks and rarely record anything other than vocals. And i found the above advice (-18dbfs)to not work well for me mixing with the FX I use. YMMV Hi Josie, That's interesting that you mention -18 dBFS. I find that for my individual instrument tracks (wav), I usually have them set so that the meters, on average, oscillate around the -18 dB mark in Reaper. For my vocals, they're usually a little higher... I estimate somewhere around -12 dB. For the Master Volume, though, I set it so that it peaks a little under 0 dB. I arrived at these values purely by trial and error and I've stayed with them because they seem to work for me. (This is the main reason that I run Reaper with a version 3 skin... I like the extra height of the meters that v3 has.) Since I have Ozone as an FX in the Master fader, I find that I need to adjust the Master fader when I play around with Ozone's presets. Regards, Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,662
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,662 |
Just for the record. I never... well let's just say, rarely.... I rarely use numbers to determine my levels. I record the track and look at the wave forms. This is my normal looking track view. The waveforms are 75% or more of the track. If they are more like straight lines, they were too weak and get recorded again after I adjust the input level up. It's rare that I overload anything I record because I have the max input levels set in my interface's software control panel front end. DUST ON THE FLOOR This is a screen shot closeup of the vocal from another studio. Notice the "overs" starting around the center and going to the right (forward) from that point. The interesting thing is that listening to this, the over's don't seem to wreak to much havoc in the tune. I try to avoid this kind of thing in my studio, but there's very little control over stuff that comes in the door. IN A WORLD WITHOUT YOU I included the links to the songs I referenced so you can hear the results. The way I determine my levels is by looking at the wave forms and also by observing the meters as I'm in playback mode and record mode. I adjust levels to stay out of the red. An occasional red blink is OK but I do not want to have constant red showing up in either mode. I look at the outputs and then after a render or export, I look carefully at the final wave to see how many peaks are touching 0dB both in the original wave and in the converted MP3 file. Just for grins, I set my levels up a bit and exported this. This is what I don't want to see. 
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
Does anyone want to learn some of the terminology involved and how that matters for setting input levels? If so, this is what I picked up in EE-638 from Purdue University many moons ago.
The quantization signal to noise ratio is 48 dB better in a 24 bit recording compared to a 16 bit recording. The rule of thumb is that the QNSR improves 6 dB for every bit of the A/D conversion at hand. To hear how this works in the reverse, take a nice clean 24 bit signal and then do bit reduction to 16 bit (most won't notice), then bit reduce to 12 bit (you will probably hear this) and then 8 bit, and you'll definitely harken back to the old Castle Wolfenstein game days with it's crudely rendered words and sounds.
Quantization noise is what happens with the signal that is effectively zero and the A/D has to decide if the signal is actually all zeros, or all zeros except for a 1 in the LSB.
2^16, or 65,536 'shelves' to stick the signal on with 16 bit recording, and 2^24 or 16,777,216 potential shelves to stick the signal on with 24 bit recording.
The quantization of the signal for a 24 bit at such a finer resolution is what accounts for the 48 dB better QSNR.
Translation: There is no harm in recording near full-scale use at 24 bit resolution, but there's also WAY WAY WAY more wiggle room (maybe another WAY in there) with 24 bit vs. 16 bit. I state that there's no harm because you can scale down the full scale tracks after you've made the recording, but the chance to be introducing quantization noise at let's say -18 dBfs, is for all intents and purposes non-existent.
Last edited by rockstar_not; 09/21/15 03:27 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,662
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,662 |
I'll pass on the big fancy words. As long as I can get the results I'm looking for..... "a couple dB lower or higher" works for me". 
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video: New User Interface (GUI)
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new user interface in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®! This modern GUI redesign offers a sleek new look with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, and a smoother workflow. The brand-new side toolbar puts track selection, the MultiPicker Library, and other essential tools right at your fingertips. Plus, our upgraded Multi-View lets you layer multiple windows without overlap, giving you a highly flexible workspace. Many windows—including Tracks, Piano Roll, and more—have been redesigned for improved usability and a cleaner, more intuitive interface, and more!
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows is here and it is packed with major new features! There’s a new modern look, a GUI redesign to all areas of the program including toolbars, windows, workflow and more. There’s a Multi-view layout for organizing multiple windows. A standout addition is the powerful AI-Notes feature, which uses AI neural-net technology to transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI—entire mixes or individual instruments—making it easy to study, view, and play parts from any song. And that’s just the beginning—there are over 60 new features in this exciting release.
Along with version 2026, we've released an incredible lineup of new content! There's 202 new RealTracks, brand-new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two new RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows and save up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special offer—available until December 31, 2025. Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page to explore all available upgrade options.
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
Our Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK are loaded with amazing add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is included with most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows packages, but you can unlock even more—including 20 unreleased RealTracks—by upgrading to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49. Browse the full contents of each package and listen to demos here.
XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs Special Extended Until August 31st!
The XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs special offers are now available until August 31st at 11:59pm PDT!
Ready to take your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 experience to the next level? Now’s the perfect time! Expand your style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs—packed with a wide variety of genres to inspire your next musical creation.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-9 includes 900 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). With over 3,500 styles (and 35 MIDI styles) included in Xtra Styles PAKs 1-20, the possibilities are endless!
Get the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 9 for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Get Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 20 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 19 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Listen to demos and order now! For Windows or for Mac.
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Don’t miss this chance to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box setup—at a great price!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,287
Posts790,584
Members39,854
| |
Most Online25,754 Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|