Interesting article. Most likely not much new information for users in this forum but some maybe surprised the practice is as common as it is.
I thought the quotes by Mike Senior and Ken Lewis were pretty good. I REALLY appreciated the tip about hiding edits behind instrument sounds. I also thought the comments about clues to recognizing comps in songs informative.
I'm currently working on narrations for lessons at an academy. Last thing I need is someone pointing out how to spot the edits .. especially when a single vocal track is all there is. Here's hoping! Using the same mic/preamp/interface/system in the same room on the same night of the week every week (and wearing the same clothes for luck) ..
Some of this stuff is tough, but it can be done!
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome Make your sound your own!
You can create a MIDI file of your vocal melody and plot your voice to a graph on the screen while recording. The graph plots with the MIDI notes so you can tell if you're a little sharp or flat. If you or your singer practice through some runs on this before recording, you may not have as much to comp later.
FREE version does not allow you to use your own MIDI files but it shows you how the tool works for deciding on purchase.
Interesting story. I guess if you have a huge budget, lots of time, and someone else is picking up the engineer's tab.... that works. Oh yeah, and, lets not forget.... a good voice to start with!!
As for me, recording non-top 10 songs in my studio mostly for fun.... I think 3 or 4 takes will work fine, hit it with Melodyne, punch in what ME can't fix in a transparent manner, put the takes in the mix layered and panned, slap some EQ and verb on it and let it roll, because , let's face it..... I'm not exactly singing at the level of Kenny Rogers, George Strait, or any of the big artists for that matter.
100 takes.... I can't even imagine how tedious that would be trying to comp. Knowing how many phrases, words, and syllables are in a given pop song..... then multiply that by 100..... now, listen to, and categorize each and every one..... now, pick the parts and put them together......
.....and don't forget to click the "SAVE" button every now and then.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.com Add nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.
The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
I agree just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you need to. A good vocalist should be able to do it in 3 takes and maybe several extra punch ins for harder parts. How did they do it before they got all this digital wizardry? I doubt 100 takes would make an appreciable difference in performance other than wearing out the vocalist.
I agree just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you need to. A good vocalist should be able to do it in 3 takes and maybe several extra punch ins for harder parts. How did they do it before they got all this digital wizardry? I doubt 100 takes would make an appreciable difference in performance other than wearing out the vocalist.
I agree with Herb 100%
I don't think what you are saying is what Herb was saying though. Just my opinion. I'm not going to speak for him.
For top 10 hits, comping is what they do. It's not "I'm sure some do" they ALL do MANY, MANY takes.
For what we do, it's probably not necessary. The reason I say "probably" is, if it's what someone wants to work on, go for it.
It's all fine in my book. I'm not commenting on what someone else should or shouldn't do.
Last edited by HearToLearn; 12/03/1505:42 AM.
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
I guess what I am saying is years ago pretty much none of this was done and many wonderful hits were released. I believe in comping to have insurance that you have enough. 100 takes and editing to the syllable seems excessive to me and you run the risk of getting too sterile but then again I'm not footing the bill and to each his own. I may just be too much an old fart.
I agree just because you CAN do something doesn't mean you need to. A good vocalist should be able to do it in 3 takes and maybe several extra punch ins for harder parts. How did they do it before they got all this digital wizardry? I doubt 100 takes would make an appreciable difference in performance other than wearing out the vocalist.
I agree with Herb 100%
I don't think what you are saying is what Herb was saying though. Just my opinion. I'm not going to speak for him.
For top 10 hits, comping is what they do. It's not "I'm sure some do" they ALL do MANY, MANY takes.
For what we do, it's probably not necessary. The reason I say "probably" is, if it's what someone wants to work on, go for it.
It's all fine in my book. I'm not commenting on what someone else should or shouldn't do.
Well, they used to have one mic in the studio and there was ONE TAKE.... learn the song, rehearse the song, then sing it into the mic. Hank Williams, Ernest Tubb, Kitty Wells, Bob Wills, Elvis, Patsy Cline,..... the list goes on and on...... all recorded that way and sound just fine. In fact, compare Cline's one take vocals to any of the singers out today.
Personally, I think this whole comping thing is a ruse. Kinda like the Wizard in the Wizard of Oz movie, all smoke and mirrors designed to impress someone..... they record all those takes to make it look like they are really a super audiophile (and they may be for all I know) ... to the folks with the money..... in the case of 100 tracks of one lead vocal...... I'd wager they might pick the best one out of the first 5 or so..... cut and paste a few places, essentially comping the track in much the same way I have done with 3 to 5 tracks.....run some transparent Melodyne on a few other nits and call it done..... but then hold off for a few days so they can then say... hey, I slaved over these tracks for the past 5 days or two weeks, or whatever...... by the way, here's my bill for labor.
How do you even listen to 100 tracks and say, .... in the 2nd verse, line two, word number 3 last syllable of the 3 syllable word is the best out of all the 100 tracks.... give me a freaking break!!!
I'm not a professional singer by any stretch of the imagination, but even I can get a vocal track right and nearly phrase perfect in under 5 takes. But.... I have also rehearsed and learned the song before I hit the record button. Beyond 5 takes, I'm simply taking up more valuable hard drive space and accomplishing nothing useful. I will listen to the tracks, look at them, and decide which one becomes the lead and which ones become the layers for thickening. I generally pick the one that needs less work, less fixing, and is generally better right out of the gate. However, there's really not that much difference between them all. That's why I can easily use them to layer and double the lead without the need to fix them.
So.... if the artist cuts 100 tracks for the lead vocal..... how many dozens more are recorded for the harmony vocals?
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 12/03/1508:47 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.com Add nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.
The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
How do you even listen to 100 tracks and say, .... in the 2nd verse, line two, word number 3 last syllable of the 3 syllable word is the best out of all the 100 tracks.... give me a freaking break!!!
I agree - there's no way 1 person can listen to every note sung on an entire song 100 times each to figure out the best one. after just a couple of notes a person's ears will already be fatigued! comping 100 takes of a lead vocal is just not practical at all.
Please know that when I say this, I'm not saying it is in any way practical. I know personally, it would be WAY WAY WAY beyond what I would ever even care to do.
For me, that would put me into complete overwhelm.
So are we clear, it's not something I personally would EVER do?
Now, that being said, I had a friend who did actually do this. We weren't close friends but enough so that I did get to witness his work. So NOT for me!
I found out that he wasn't so much comparing from the aspect of just going in blindly to see which one he liked best out of all of them. It was more an approach of he knew the sound he was looking for and checked to see which he felt was closest to that sound. Those sounds he would compare.
That also doesn't mean that he did every single syllable of every word. If they were fine they were fine. If they weren't, sometimes he would have to listen to the same mistake many, many times in different tracks, until he found one that wasn't that way.
I'm not in any way defending his methods, just saying I saw it first hand. And it wasn't like he was doing it to impress me by any means. It was his job, and he got amazing results.
Bottom line is I don't think people that do this are lying.
He was elite, and got paid very well for it.
My personal take is, there are people in ANY field of endeavor that take things WAY beyond what the rest of us would.
I've heard stories of titans of industry, great athletes, writers, you name it who do things we would never dream of.
Just because we think we could get the same results easier, doesn't mean that we can.
I'm sorry to say, with all do respect, we (notice I included me in this) can sit and talk, but they are doing AND get far superior results! There are the players on the field, and the fans in the stands. Then there are the armchair quarterbacks. Just my opinion.
I'm neither a player on the field, nor an armchair quarterback. I'm probably more flag football level. I play, but come on....do I really think I'm playing? Nope
He was a great guy, well respected, AND down to earth.
I will also say he committed suicide. I've always wondered, but don't know, if it had anything to do with his obsessiveness.
Striving for perfection can be taken too far, in my book.
Last edited by HearToLearn; 12/03/1509:58 AM.
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
I will take a first or second take any day because after that you lose the emotion and the live feel. I will take a first or second take even if it has a couple of small warts in it. If it has a large wart the cut and paste works just fine for me. YMMV.
The bumper sticker said "I'm a veterinarian, therefore I can drive like an animal". Suddenly I realized how many proctologists are on the road.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
I will take a first or second take any day because after that you lose the emotion and the live feel. I will take a first or second take even if it has a couple of small warts in it. If it has a large wart the cut and paste works just fine for me. YMMV.
There's not enough tricks or comps to make MY vocal work
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
I will take a first or second take any day because after that you lose the emotion and the live feel. I will take a first or second take even if it has a couple of small warts in it. If it has a large wart the cut and paste works just fine for me. YMMV.
With today's DAW's, it's best to hit record even on your warm up time. And I LOVE punch in capability. My motto is to always record more than I need in case I need more than I have....
Gems sometimes happen unintentionally, even if you're just playing around.
There was a YouTube video about vocal recording from Alan Parsons that's no longer up on YouTube but there was a portion featuring Michael McDonald. He said in the interview he normally has to practice 3-4 hours before his voice is suitable to him to begin actual serious takes.
Please know that when I say this, I'm not saying it is in any way practical. I know personally, it would be WAY WAY WAY beyond what I would ever even care to do.
For me, that would put me into complete overwhelm.
So are we clear, it's not something I personally would EVER do?
Now, that being said, I had a friend who did actually do this. We weren't close friends but enough so that I did get to witness his work. So NOT for me!
I found out that he wasn't so much comparing from the aspect of just going in blindly to see which one he liked best out of all of them. It was more an approach of he knew the sound he was looking for and checked to see which he felt was closest to that sound. Those sounds he would compare.
That also doesn't mean that he did every single syllable of every word. If they were fine they were fine. If they weren't, sometimes he would have to listen to the same mistake many, many times in different tracks, until he found one that wasn't that way.
I'm not in any way defending his methods, just saying I saw it first hand. And it wasn't like he was doing it to impress me by any means. It was his job, and he got amazing results.
Bottom line is I don't think people that do this are lying.
He was elite, and got paid very well for it.
My personal take is, there are people in ANY field of endeavor that take things WAY beyond what the rest of us would.
I've heard stories of titans of industry, great athletes, writers, you name it who do things we would never dream of.
Just because we think we could get the same results easier, doesn't mean that we can.
I'm sorry to say, with all do respect, we (notice I included me in this) can sit and talk, but they are doing AND get far superior results! There are the players on the field, and the fans in the stands. Then there are the armchair quarterbacks. Just my opinion.
I'm neither a player on the field, nor an armchair quarterback. I'm probably more flag football level. I play, but come on....do I really think I'm playing? Nope
He was a great guy, well respected, AND down to earth.
I will also say he committed suicide. I've always wondered, but don't know, if it had anything to do with his obsessiveness.
Striving for perfection can be taken too far, in my book.
but was he also the vocalist or was he recording someone else? do professional vocalists really do 100 takes? I can't imagine doing this because after 20+ takes the vocalist is going to be worn out and the rest of the vocal takes are going to be crap anyway - assuming they are done all in one day.
Many of my songs are first or second vocal take. Because recently, I haven't even been doing layering. I've gotten really lazy on a few songs.
One take.... punch in on a few mistakes or glitches.... fix the rest with Melodyne...and I'm done.
I didn't mean to insinuate that everyone comping more than 2 dozen tracks was lying about it.... I know they do that, and I know they know what they're doing. It was more like an exaggeration on my part to illustrate how absurd that sounds.... 100 tracks and fixing syllables.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.com Add nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.
The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
Well, they used to have one mic in the studio and there was ONE TAKE.... learn the song, rehearse the song, then sing it into the mic. Hank Williams, Ernest Tubb, Kitty Wells, Bob Wills, Elvis, Patsy Cline,..... the list goes on and on...... all recorded that way and sound just fine. In fact, compare Cline's one take vocals to any of the singers out today.
I love a lot of the old music and certainly appreciate how they had to do it! Can you imagine nowadays having to splice a tape when I can do that digitally in a few seconds?
But, I also recognize that, regardless of whether or not you prefer it, today's music, studio performance, recording, mixing, mastering, etc. is far more sophisticated, and I would say a lot better, than my old Hank Williams records! That is just obvious progress during 60+ years of experience!
Quote:
How do you even listen to 100 tracks and say, .... in the 2nd verse, line two, word number 3 last syllable of the 3 syllable word is the best out of all the 100 tracks.... give me a freaking break!!!
Yeah, I agree 100%! I find it a chore to even work through 5 tracks. It encourages me to work harder to learn and sing the song better because that part is actually more fun than the sorting through a bunch of mediocre performances!
With today's DAW's, it's best to hit record even on your warm up time. And I LOVE punch in capability. My motto is to always record more than I need in case I need more than I have....
Gems sometimes happen unintentionally, even if you're just playing around.
So true!! I've had both sides of this.
1-Had something because we were recording.
2-Missed something because we weren't
Quote:
There was a YouTube video about vocal recording from Alan Parsons that's no longer up on YouTube but there was a portion featuring Michael McDonald. He said in the interview he normally has to practice 3-4 hours before his voice is suitable to him to begin actual serious takes.
I would have LOVED to see that!
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
The way comping is being addressed here, you guys are correct that it doesn't take 100 takes to get it right. However, many big studio recordings are done over a considerable period of time, sometimes months or more... No takes are discarded.. The singer comes in several times over a period of several months. New vocals are recorded with alternate phrasing. Different mic's may be used to try a different tone. The vocalist may be asked by the producer to try the song with a different emotional vibe.
There may be several 'alternate' versions of the same song, each requiring different phrasing and emotion. New or additional producers may be brought in - their input can change the direction or breath new life into a song everyone knows is a hit but for some reason or other, the magic hasn't been found yet.
100 takes isn't so awesome over a six month period. And in the digital domain today, nothing is discarded.
Listen to the out takes and alternate versions of the Beatles and Beach Boys songs available on YouTube. Many early versions of their hits vary greatly from the final commercial single. Also, back in the day, album versions of a song many times differed from the single release.
I also think you guys may be underestimating how advanced tape splicing/editing was back in the day. They really could take pieces from 5-6 different takes of a song music and vocals and cut/splice them into a single composite. There was also a lot of bouncing between machines to save various versions and experiments... Its not unusual to hear the Beatles stop and restart a song at a bridge or 2nd verse. That could be edited into a completely separate first verse recorded at a different time.
but was he also the vocalist or was he recording someone else?
He was recording others.
Quote:
do professional vocalists really do 100 takes? I can't imagine doing this because after 20+ takes the vocalist is going to be worn out and the rest of the vocal takes are going to be crap anyway - assuming they are done all in one day.
They are NOT all done in a single day by any means.
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
The way comping is being addressed here, you guys are correct that it doesn't take 100 takes to get it right. However, many big studio recordings are done over a considerable period of time, sometimes months or more... No takes are discarded.. The singer comes in several times over a period of several months. New vocals are recorded with alternate phrasing. Different mic's may be used to try a different tone. The vocalist may be asked by the producer to try the song with a different emotional vibe.
There may be several 'alternate' versions of the same song, each requiring different phrasing and emotion. New or additional producers may be brought in - their input can change the direction or breath new life into a song everyone knows is a hit but for some reason or other, the magic hasn't been found yet.
100 takes isn't so awesome over a six month period. And in the digital domain today, nothing is discarded.
Listen to the out takes and alternate versions of the Beatles and Beach Boys songs available on YouTube. Many early versions of their hits vary greatly from the final commercial single. Also, back in the day, album versions of a song many times differed from the single release.
I also think you guys may be underestimating how advanced tape splicing/editing was back in the day. They really could take pieces from 5-6 different takes of a song music and vocals and cut/splice them into a single composite. There was also a lot of bouncing between machines to save various versions and experiments... Its not unusual to hear the Beatles stop and restart a song at a bridge or 2nd verse. That could be edited into a completely separate first verse recorded at a different time.
Exactly!
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
Many of my songs are first or second vocal take. Because recently, I haven't even been doing layering. I've gotten really lazy on a few songs.
One take.... punch in on a few mistakes or glitches.... fix the rest with Melodyne...and I'm done.
I didn't mean to insinuate that everyone comping more than 2 dozen tracks was lying about it.... I know they do that, and I know they know what they're doing. It was more like an exaggeration on my part to illustrate how absurd that sounds.... 100 tracks and fixing syllables.
I personally have wondered if the number of times they redo a vocal, or any instrument, swells to the allowed budget!
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
but was he also the vocalist or was he recording someone else?
He was recording others.
Quote:
do professional vocalists really do 100 takes? I can't imagine doing this because after 20+ takes the vocalist is going to be worn out and the rest of the vocal takes are going to be crap anyway - assuming they are done all in one day.
They are NOT all done in a single day by any means.
that would definitely make more sense to do them over more than 1 "session."
I'm absolutely not questioning that your friend did it or not. and I'm sure if one person would do it then there are others who would as well. I just can't imagine it really being practical (which I know you've already said you aren't defending the practicality of it).
Many of my songs are first or second vocal take. Because recently, I haven't even been doing layering. I've gotten really lazy on a few songs.
One take.... punch in on a few mistakes or glitches.... fix the rest with Melodyne...and I'm done.
I didn't mean to insinuate that everyone comping more than 2 dozen tracks was lying about it.... I know they do that, and I know they know what they're doing. It was more like an exaggeration on my part to illustrate how absurd that sounds.... 100 tracks and fixing syllables.
I personally have wondered if the number of times they redo a vocal, or any instrument, swells to the allowed budget!
yep! most places aren't going to come in WAY below budget!
I guess it varies with your work flow. I opened a project and checked the number of 'comps' (edits for one track) .. was surprised. I suppose if the one vocal track has a couple dozen, the others added on may approach 50 pretty quickly here. 100 for professional work doesn't seem unfathomable at all. Heck I may have projects with that many, ain't got time to count 'em!
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome Make your sound your own!
I guess it varies with your work flow. I opened a project and checked the number of 'comps' (edits for one track) .. was surprised. I suppose if the one vocal track has a couple dozen, the others added on may approach 50 pretty quickly here. 100 for professional work doesn't seem unfathomable at all. Heck I may have projects with that many, ain't got time to count 'em!
That helps put it in perspective.
Thanks for posting this!
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
I guess with me I am recording to evaluate live performance.....so I want all my vocals single take to see if they are ready for live performance. I record vocals, backing tracks, and live instruments and then evaluate. It gives you a measure on mixing balance and performance. For me I seldom get thru a vocal completely flawless but totally acceptable. My fiance who has a fantastic voice is pretty much flawless.....drives me crazy. So none of this applies to why we comp...for me it just gives me some insurance that I have enough to work with. When I recorded my band for a demo I wanted it to be completely live so it was a fair representation of us live. Because we didn't do retakes just set up and played thru I had a few I had to toss because of issues I couldn't do anything with.
I am aware of comping, but have to admit that I probably didn't understand the depths that are used to get the 'good' 'better' 'best' takes.
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
There are many examples on YouTube of recording sessions where you 'see' comping being done but there's no reference noting it. Usually, the emphasis of the video is a more global subject like in this link to Shania Twain and Lionel Ritchie recording "Endless Love". The recording session is portrayed for the viewer to feel the insecurities and struggles of Shania, so we see her sing a phrase, stop, and so on. But note the recording is being done phrase by phrase. It's not just due to her struggles because even when she nails a take spot on, she stops singing and recording stops. Each and every time. Endless Love
There are many examples on YouTube of recording sessions where you 'see' comping being done but there's no reference noting it. Usually, the emphasis of the video is a more global subject like in this link to Shania Twain and Lionel Ritchie recording "Endless Love". The recording session is portrayed for the viewer to feel the insecurities and struggles of Shania, so we see her sing a phrase, stop, and so on. But note the recording is being done phrase by phrase. It's not just due to her struggles because even when she nails a take spot on, she stops singing and recording stops. Each and every time. Endless Love
A few things struck me about this video.
-What you already pointed out.
-The casualness of the environment.
Gone are some of the illusions of the BIG recording studios to pump out a track like this.
thanks for sharing this! I never knew this was out there...even the remake of the song. VERY cool! I enjoyed it A LOT!
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos
There wasn't a lot of comping with Ella .. not so sure about Frank, he always had something up his sleeve. (grin)
I've liked Mr Foster for a long time, it took me a few years to realize I was appreciating his editing/production techniques more than the music. But that's just me. He had a couple solo things I really liked, and they were probably made on a pretty tight budget at the time ..
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome Make your sound your own!
Some really great material in this thread, for sure.
One of my favorite CD's is "David Foster Recordings".
Sheer genius no matter how you look at it. From piano to production and everything in between.
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
lots happening in life, been busy this last year. My job moved away, and I started a new business to pay bills spent 3 of the last 7 months doing volunteer work in new York. not much music time, so I am getting up and running again. I hope all is well with you and yours.
Last edited by Robh; 12/15/1507:38 AM.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96
lots happening in life, been busy this last year. My job moved away, and I started a new business to pay bills spent 3 of the last 7 months doing volunteer work in new York. not much music time, so I am getting up and running again. I hope all is well with you and yours.
So perhaps a "We have a Robh sighting" could apply as well?
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
lots happening in life, been busy this last year. My job moved away, and I started a new business to pay bills spent 3 of the last 7 months doing volunteer work in new York. not much music time, so I am getting up and running again. I hope all is well with you and yours.
wow, a lot has changed for you!
we're doing well! I've been really busy myself, but I still have a job; been doing a lot of volunteer work at the church and been working also as a part time fill in worship leader.
Even though I've been busy I've also still been working on music with a couple of guys from the Cakewalk forum.
No worries at all. I think the subject was done and just went the way it did. Like a real conversation! That is kind of cool that that can happen on here.
All good! Carry on it you would like
Chad (Hope that makes it easier)
TEMPO TANTRUM: What a lead singer has when they can't stay in time.
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window
In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean