Originally Posted By: Paj
Hello, all.

...
After reading FAQ #47, I see that I can still have my usual (WMA) setup upgraded in addition to having the audiophile files available.

So: Would anyone like to share insights/experiences about . . .

(1) . . . the workflow differences between the WMA and WAV versions?

(2) . . . the obvious/immediate differences between the quality of the WMA and WAV output?

Thanks, in advance,
Paj
8^)



1: There are absolutely no workflow differences, if the WAV files are available, they automatically get used in preference to the compressed files (the software looks for WAV files first).

2: This is a point of discussion every year. Feel free to do a search, but this post has some useful information


BIAB & RB2025 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones