|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,660
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,660 |
Here is a idea. Why not take this and place it on the Wish List. ...Said with a big smile on a cold and dark Sunday morning in Chicago!
BIAB – 2026, Reaper (current), i7-12700F Processor, 32GB DDR4-3200MHz RAM, Motu Audio Express 6x6 - My SoundCloud.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,851
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,851 |
How many *.sty files are in your bb folder? in my bb folder I have 5,088 files with the .STY extension. Then that is what you have. Well, yes, obviously! But my question was why is it reported in several different quantities by BIAB? What is correct? Etc. So your file count in Drive:\BB should match the number of installed styles using the slow rebuild option. And that is where the confusion is...BIAB does not report the same number as are on my drive!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,851
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,851 |
I don't think they will change it as the programmers seem to have a 'that will do attitude' as is evidenced all over the program. I often feel like a ferret in a labrinth
Z and I'm sure we will shortly have folks responding about how being a "ferret in a labrinth" is a good thing...a handy BIAB feature...to help them learn through discovery or some such reason! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 426
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 426 |
Its not a bug ...its a feature!!
I'm doing allright for Country Trash ....
I used to care, but things have changed (Bob Dylan)
BIAB 2025W + RB
M-Audio FastTrack C600, Rode NT2-A
Digitech VoiceLive 4
Epiphone Sheraton, Ibanez 12str, Washburn 6str, Cort 6Str Nylon
Yanagisawa Tenor Sax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869 |
I just checked out the record function again, I was hoping their might be some way of simply recording. If its a MIDI recording then it can be a soloist or a melody recording, but if its an audio recording apparently not. Set recording levels and you get dumped out of the program into Windows. Click ANYWHERE in the box (not on the icon in the corner) and inexplicably, a video is loaded into Windows explorer.
This video first teaches you how to use windows '8/7/vista' then how to use a 'very common audio device' Realtek Audio Manager which it then proceeds to explain (no I am not making this up!4 how to use a realtek device. Enough to confuse any newbie.
Why not actually handle recording in app like other programs?
Further investigation as to how to record Audio brings up the helpful Audio settings panel. Like many other boxes in BIAB be careful where you click as clicking anywhere in the bottom half is liable to tick or untick a box even if you are not hovering over a box. I nearly clicked "Mixer requires keystrokes to open Record Panel"
Apparently this tick box is for windows 95 users! Perhaps the last time the code was revised.
"If you are running Windows 95, check to allow access to the Record Control from Band-in-a-Box. Do not check if using Windows 98 or greater."
Even after taking the ferret through this particular labrinth, if an audio recording is successful, there is no visual representation in the GUI, no layer to see. Only in the Audio edit window can you see something, but then of course you cant see the song or chords.
No, there is no ability to edit in the main gui, there is no ability to cut and paste, no ability to record multiple takes.
I think PG think 'this will do' and since windows 95 - years ago, have seen no urgent need to revise or improve this essential feature.
Recording should be easy, in house, and with proper VISUAL feedback in the main gui. Retakes and cutting and pasting between take should be easy.
Why is there only an ability to record MIDI as a 'soloist' or as a 'melody'. Why not an audio recording of a melody or solo? Its the same answer as why a banjo or violin was a guitar for years. No one has bothered to improve the gui.
I think its legacy coding that they have not bothered to improve since Windows 95 days - 21 years ago. It will do as it is.
It does not matter that any new user would naturally think that an audio recording can be a melody, or a solo. It 'will do' like this.
Why is the Audio track the only track that can be hidden in the mixer? Because it will do like this.
There are examples everywhere of this attitude.
Ferret in a labrinth, that's my experience
Z
Last edited by ZeroZero; 01/03/16 11:03 AM.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,851
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,851 |
I just checked out the record function again, I was hoping their might be some way of simply recording. If its a MIDI recording then it can be a soloist or a melody recording, but if its an audio recording apparently not. Set recording levels and you get dumped out of the program into Windows. Click ANYWHERE in the box (not on the icon in the corner) and inexplicably, a video is loaded into Windows explorer.
This video first teaches you how to use windows '8/7/vista' then how to use a 'very common audio device' Realtek Audio Manager which it then proceeds to explain (no I am not making this up!4 how to use a realtek device. Enough to confuse any newbie.
Why not actually handle recording in app like other programs?
Further investigation as to how to record Audio brings up the helpful Audio settings panel. Like many other boxes in BIAB be careful where you click as clicking anywhere in the bottom half is liable to tick or untick a box even if you are not hovering over a box. I nearly clicked "Mixer requires keystrokes to open Record Panel"
Apparently this tick box is for windows 95 users! Perhaps the last time the code was revised.
"If you are running Windows 95, check to allow access to the Record Control from Band-in-a-Box. Do not check if using Windows 98 or greater."
Even after taking the ferret through this particular labrinth, if an audio recording is successful, there is no visual representation in the GUI, no layer to see. Only in the Audio edit window can you see something, but then of course you cant see the song or chords.
No, there is no ability to edit in the main gui, there is no ability to cut and paste, no ability to record multiple takes.
I think PG think 'this will do' and since windows 95 - years ago, have seen no urgent need to revise or improve this essential feature.
Recording should be easy, in house, and with proper VISUAL feedback in the main gui. Retakes and cutting and pasting between take should be easy.
Why is there only an ability to record MIDI as a 'soloist' or as a 'melody'. Why not an audio recording of a melody or solo? Its the same answer as why a banjo or violin was a guitar for years. No one has bothered to improve the gui.
I think its legacy coding that they have not bothered to improve since Windows 95 days - 21 years ago. It will do as it is.
It does not matter that any new user would naturally think that an audio recording can be a melody, or a solo. It 'will do' like this.
Why is the Audio track the only track that can be hidden in the mixer? Because it will do like this.
There are examples everywhere of this attitude.
Ferret in a labrinth, that's my experience
Z
You are correct of course but I do not hold much hope for solutions to the things you are describing. My advice to any newbie would be to use BIAB to generate instrument tracks that follow your song's chord progressions & tempo, export them dry & centered and then do all of your production in your modern DAW software. Don't bother with any feature that does not directly aid you in getting those instrument tracks exported!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,128
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,128 |
I just checked out the record function again, I was hoping their might be some way of simply recording. If its a MIDI recording then it can be a soloist or a melody recording, but if its an audio recording apparently not. Set recording levels and you get dumped out of the program into Windows. Click ANYWHERE in the box (not on the icon in the corner) and inexplicably, a video is loaded into Windows explorer.
This video first teaches you how to use windows '8/7/vista' then how to use a 'very common audio device' Realtek Audio Manager which it then proceeds to explain (no I am not making this up!4 how to use a realtek device. Enough to confuse any newbie.
Why not actually handle recording in app like other programs?
Further investigation as to how to record Audio brings up the helpful Audio settings panel. Like many other boxes in BIAB be careful where you click as clicking anywhere in the bottom half is liable to tick or untick a box even if you are not hovering over a box. I nearly clicked "Mixer requires keystrokes to open Record Panel"
Apparently this tick box is for windows 95 users! Perhaps the last time the code was revised.
"If you are running Windows 95, check to allow access to the Record Control from Band-in-a-Box. Do not check if using Windows 98 or greater."
Even after taking the ferret through this particular labrinth, if an audio recording is successful, there is no visual representation in the GUI, no layer to see. Only in the Audio edit window can you see something, but then of course you cant see the song or chords.
No, there is no ability to edit in the main gui, there is no ability to cut and paste, no ability to record multiple takes.
I think PG think 'this will do' and since windows 95 - years ago, have seen no urgent need to revise or improve this essential feature.
Recording should be easy, in house, and with proper VISUAL feedback in the main gui. Retakes and cutting and pasting between take should be easy.
Why is there only an ability to record MIDI as a 'soloist' or as a 'melody'. Why not an audio recording of a melody or solo? Its the same answer as why a banjo or violin was a guitar for years. No one has bothered to improve the gui.
I think its legacy coding that they have not bothered to improve since Windows 95 days - 21 years ago. It will do as it is.
It does not matter that any new user would naturally think that an audio recording can be a melody, or a solo. It 'will do' like this.
Why is the Audio track the only track that can be hidden in the mixer? Because it will do like this.
There are examples everywhere of this attitude.
Ferret in a labrinth, that's my experience
Z
Edited by ZeroZero (01/03/16 10:03 PM)
---->Every Day I use BIAB and love it<------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869 |
you are correct of course but I do not hold much hope for solutions to the things you are describing. My advice to any newbie would be to use BIAB to generate instrument tracks that follow your song's chord progressions & tempo, export them dry & centered and then do all of your production in your modern DAW software. Don't bother with any feature that does not directly aid you in getting those instrument tracks exported! Sadly true. I don't touch recording, notation(which leaps around) , Audio editors - featureless. VSTs - blippy, simply because they don't have the functionality or fall over. There are some world class features bot overall Its a mess of a gui. The new improvements are about 5 percent of what is required and even they don't work properly Z Z
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,041
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,041 |
You are correct of course but I do not hold much hope for solutions to the things you are describing. My advice to any newbie would be to use BIAB to generate instrument tracks that follow your song's chord progressions & tempo, export them dry & centered and then do all of your production in your modern DAW software. Don't bother with any feature that does not directly aid you in getting those instrument tracks exported!
That is BiaB's main and should be it's only function IMHO. It should drop everything else like recording, notation etc and concentrate on backing tracks, both MIDI and RTs, output (XML, MIDI and audio) and go to 64 bit so our excellent VSTis will work with it. There are far superior tools for recording, audio editing, notation etc. I feel using BiaB's tools for these functions would equivocate to building a house with on a hand saw, hammer and nails while your neighbor builds a house with power tools. YMMV
I'm in a fitness protection program. I'm been hiding from exercise.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,497
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,497 |
Actually that is what BIAB IS - that is its roots - and thst' the ONLY reason I buy it year, after year, after year. The other "slap-ins" (and I do not mean that in a derogatory way) (audio, etc.) within BIAB were ASKED for over the years by USERS. BIAB is NOT A DAW - Like I commented to someone in the RB forum who kept delineating all the things that Reaper does that BIAB and RB does not do - I asked him if he goes to Reaper forum to delineate all the things BIAB and RB does that Reaper DOES NOT! May as well complain about why Excel (a spreadsheet) does not do relational database SQL functions, or why Photoshop doesn't do Nero video functions, or why my Ruger Old Army black powder revolver isn't magazine fed. No I'm not a "PG fanboy" I use BIAB for what I bought it for and it does that exceptionally well. Currently, nothing else, OTHER than Jammer Pro 6, comes close. As a side bar, while JP6 is still sold, it even has an MFX plug-in, and I still get marketing emails to buy, but nothing new has come out since about early 2009! If some other PC or Mac product did what BIAB does - then folks would be buying that product and I'd be reading those forum complaints about why that other song making program doesn’t do things the way BIAB does or why that program doesn't do statistical analysis of the db values of the sampled positive peaks so that Ozone Pro could more easily be programmed to squeeze that last 0.1db of normalized compression into the resultant MP3 "tune." BTW to OP you HAVE ALL THE CURRENT (PG) STYLES! See earlier post, But you don't have all the Note's Norton, and other 3rd party styles, so you are WAY behind Larry
Last edited by Larry Kehl; 01/04/16 05:19 AM.
Win10Pro,i9,64GB,2TBSSD+20TBHDDs,1080TI,BIAB'24,Scarlett18i8,Montage7,Fusion 8HD,QS8,Integra7,XV5080,QSR,SC-8850,SPLAT,FL21&others,Komp.14,IK suite&others, just a guitar player-AXE FX III &FM9T, FishmanTP, MIDIGuitar2, GK2/3'sw/GI20
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869 |
[quote=MarioD
There are far superior tools for recording, audio editing, notation etc. I feel using BiaB's tools for these functions would equivocate to building a house with on a hand saw, hammer and nails while your neighbor builds a house with power tools.
YMMV
[/quote]
Some very good points above, though I would say that recording your musical performance along with BIAB IS a core function. I don't think many buy it just lo listen, and recording your practice can be an enlightening experience, if sometimes suprisng.
Lots of people would enjoy the musical challenge, but not the technically challenge, which borders on the absurd, if you don't know any better.
There are some things I LOVE about BIAB as we all do here, Real Tracks are King.
I do like the idea of lanes, just not the implementation. Just to dream a bit, I would love to see a 'layer view' . I would like to see the main GUI scroll according to tempo rather than leap around, and be capable of presenting a track horizontally, like a proper sequencer. I would want to be able to control bar size controls intuitively, graphically by dragging.
From there, it would be possible to have track types, for example:
1] Chord Info Track (shows per bar info such as chord name, Roman numerals, bar number - similar to main GUI) This track would have a timeline feature beats or minutes.
2} Real Track/user Audio recording track with subtypes)
3] MIDI/XML?User MIDI recording track (subtypes such as supertracks) views for notation, piano roll etc.)
4] Notation Track (selectable clef types, single double
Where the GUI scrolls left to right, there less of a problem presenting the tracks - like a sequencer does
Each of the (used tracks could have a lane, and everything could be hidden or revealed as appropriate.
A simple view would be just the chords with selectable info.
A more complex view might be a view where a MIDI and or a Real Track notation track was also displayed, or some notation for the bass part. The user could customise the complexity.
Ill call this "Layer view".
I think most of the tech is there for such a view, its a matter of rethinking the GUI and displaying things in useful intuitive way.
Z
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,128
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,128 |
[/quote]
though I would say that recording your musical performance along with BIAB IS a core function. I don't think many buy it just lo listen, and recording your practice can be an enlightening experience, if sometimes suprisng.
Z [/quote]
To be honest Zero I don't think most people want to be able to record into biab.
Most people from reading the forums down through the years use biab as a quick sketchpad to audition styles and some realtracks, lay out the foundation of their song such as chords and them open it in realband to generate more realtracks, and either finish the project in realband or another DAW.
Maybe you are expecting more from biab than what its intended to do.
Musiclover
Last edited by musiclover; 01/04/16 08:09 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,041
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,041 |
Well stated Musiclover and I agree 100%.
I'm in a fitness protection program. I'm been hiding from exercise.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,497
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2000
Posts: 2,497 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,808
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,808 |
Yes, always use the best tool for the job. BiaB does some things best, other tools (including RealBand) do other things best.
You can hammer a nail in with a wrench, but your hammer is better for that purpose.
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Professional & Windows 11, Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869 |
You friends are free to disagree, and the user base must be very diverse, even so I would say that if BIAB are going to provide this function it should be done in a proper user friendly way, you cannot hear your synth,for levelling purposes, until the song starts - this should be fixed too, we are always 'working around' stuff like this. It been there for a long time, so it will do,
Keep record function and improve it is what I say. It should even be possible for BIAB to have only one button, which provides both MIDI and Audio record.
Personally I dont see the need for two programs, because RB can never compare to a real sequencer. The recording and display assets it has, could be integrated, in a rethink, redesign, which I think will come with 64 bit, whenever that is. BIAB>RB>DAW is a labrinth, and if you need to step back and forth through apps it can be tedious IMO.
It's a bit sad to think that the best thing to do with BIAB is export to DAW as soon as you can.
Z
Last edited by ZeroZero; 01/05/16 12:04 AM.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,199
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,199 |
Hi zero,
I don't find it a labyrinth at all.
I use the program for songwriting and it is brilliant. There's nothing else around that even comes close to the versatility that BIAB offers me in relation to composing a song and developing an arrangement.
When I start to look at producing the arrangement, I then move to programs that offer production flexibility in the same way that BIAB offers songwriting/arranging flexibility.
Just my tuppence worth.
Regards,
Noel
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,610
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,610 |
Hi zero,
I don't find it a labyrinth at all.
....
Just my tuppence worth.
Add mine to that 
Cheers, Mike My Music * Asus ROG Strix G15CF 32 GB DDR4 4TB HDD + 1 TB SSD NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 8GB Win 11 AKAI EIE PRO Sound Interface. BIAB/RB 2024 UltraPak Build - Latest
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,869 |
Hi zero,
I don't find it a labyrinth at all.
I use the program for songwriting and it is brilliant. There's nothing else around that even comes close to the versatility that BIAB offers me in relation to composing a song and developing an arrangement.
When I start to look at producing the arrangement, I then move to programs that offer production flexibility in the same way that BIAB offers songwriting/arranging flexibility.
Just my tuppence worth.
Regards,
Noel First off I respect this point of view BIAB has a wide user base for differing needs. IMO if you use BIAB to knock together a few chords, its very easy, and much functionality is at hand for even a novice. There is a long list of stuff that could be a lot better, and many things have been on the wish list for years. Personally I don't think that RB will ever be a DAW, like the big boys, so I don't see a need for a separate program. If you are going to export to a DAW you would not export to RB and then to Sonar/Cubase/Logic etc.. Every time you leave a program, then you loose its functionality. It can become difficult when actively working on a program to find you need to jump around through tunnels. This is why I feel that the best of BIAB should be integrated with the best of RB and their be one package instead of two. Because I also believe that most features need to be revised and improved, I think the GUI should be totally rewritten and a new product launched. Every year PG take a lot of Money from us, and sure the real tracks are great, but product development is meagre and shaky, probably because of vast acres of legacy code - I guess. Recently we have lost the ability to customise the GUI menus, been told we were getting bonus tracks which we already had, and the new layers don't save/hide properly, I also understand the XML is proving problematic (from threads). There is a lot to love, but I don't think this update is good. I still want record to be easy and in house - not in windows.
Win 11 64, Asus Rog Strix z390 mobo, 64 gig RAM, 8700k
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box for Windows
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,199
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,199 |
First off I respect this point of view BIAB has a wide user base for differing needs. IMO if you use BIAB to knock together a few chords, its very easy, and much functionality is at hand for even a novice. There is a long list of stuff that could be a lot better, and many things have been on the wish list for years. Personally I don't think that RB will ever be a DAW, like the big boys, so I don't see a need for a separate program. If you are going to export to a DAW you would not export to RB and then to Sonar/Cubase/Logic etc..
Every time you leave a program, then you loose its functionality. It can become difficult when actively working on a program to find you need to jump around through tunnels. This is why I feel that the best of BIAB should be integrated with the best of RB and their be one package instead of two. Because I also believe that most features need to be revised and improved, I think the GUI should be totally rewritten and a new product launched. Every year PG take a lot of Money from us, and sure the real tracks are great, but product development is meagre and shaky, probably because of vast acres of legacy code - I guess. Recently we have lost the ability to customise the GUI menus, been told we were getting bonus tracks which we already had, and the new layers don't save/hide properly, I also understand the XML is proving problematic (from threads). There is a lot to love, but I don't think this update is good. I still want record to be easy and in house - not in windows. ZeroZero, I hope that my below post doesn't come across as antagonistic or argumentative because that is not what I intend at all. I write simply because I find the following comment of yours disappointing and misleading and I cannot let it pass. Every year PG take a lot of Money from us You've been around on the forums longer than I have and you know that PG Music never "take" money from anyone. If a customer wants to pay for a product that PG Music sells then a transaction takes place. If that customer then feels that they haven't got their money's worth, PG Music offer a 30 day window wherein the customer can ask for a refund... no questions asked. I've seen this happen a few times over the years. How can this possibly be interpreted as "taking money from us"? You mention that you don't think this update is good. I disagree because, for me, the update is excellent. Since your needs are different from mine, though, maybe it's not value-for-money for you. I don't know. If that's the case, and you are unhappy with BIAB/RB 2016, why complain because you chose to buy it? Simply return the program. I know that PG Music will support your decision wholeheartedly if you are within that 30 day window. Since I first bought BIAB in 2006, I have found PG Music outstanding to deal with and I have a great deal of respect for Peter and his team. They have done a great job in creating something that, in so many ways, is truly unique. Even today after so many years, every time I click on generate and a top-notch musical backing is created, I'm amazed. Regards, Noel P.S. Like you I am a user and am not a PG Music representative.
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Video: New User Interface (GUI)
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new user interface in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®! This modern GUI redesign offers a sleek new look with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, and a smoother workflow. The brand-new side toolbar puts track selection, the MultiPicker Library, and other essential tools right at your fingertips. Plus, our upgraded Multi-View lets you layer multiple windows without overlap, giving you a highly flexible workspace. Many windows—including Tracks, Piano Roll, and more—have been redesigned for improved usability and a cleaner, more intuitive interface, and more!
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Mac Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Mac & Windows Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,345
Posts791,141
Members39,859
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean