Expand BIAB to 10 instruments. Have super DUPER real Drums. Kick, Snare, hi hat,Toms, Cymbals on separate tracks. The ability to build a custom set from those individual tracks. Or just load a SUPER_RD in a style but with the track separation.
Last edited by dga; 04/15/1605:45 PM.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
There are lots of compressed/lossless compression audio formats now that support multichannel. In the usertrack forum there are multichannel drums but I think they are just for real band and power tracks. Maybe if band in a box could load a multichannel audio drum file and use a multichannel file mixer you could leave it as one track but when you export it will split to separate wav files.
There are lots of compressed/lossless compression audio formats now that support multichannel. In the usertrack forum there are multichannel drums but I think they are just for real band and power tracks. Maybe if band in a box could load a multichannel audio drum file and use a multichannel file mixer you could leave it as one track but when you export it will split to separate wav files.
Any way that allows auditioning/selecting the separate drum parts in BIAB would suite me. Laying it out as simply 3 or 4 tracks listing the Kick, Snare, (Hi Hat and Cymbals}, and Toms.
Say I want to replace the Kick drum sound, or switch Snare W/O switching the other RD in the style. That would be super DUPER for me.
Last edited by dga; 04/15/1605:50 PM.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
Any way that allows auditioning/selecting the separate drum parts in BIAB would suite me. Laying it out as simply 3 or 4 tracks listing the Kick, Snare, (Hi Hat and Cymbals}, and Toms.
Say I want to replace the Kick drum sound, or switch Snare W/O switching the other RD in the style. That would be super DUPER for me.
Pipeline I was not a forum user until 2/22/15 so I didn't catch this post from early in 2014, but elements of the post are almost identical. A retroactive +1 to solidrock
Last edited by dga; 04/15/1606:06 PM.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
I don't know guys, I'll say the same thing I did at that time.
RD's are AUDIO recordings of a real drummer on a real drum kit in a real studio. You know all the shows and pics you've seen of recording studios or concerts? The drum set might have 10 mics all around it but no matter how good you are as an engineer you are still recording the whole drum kit. You can get some half decent isolation between mics but it's not going to be good enough to use one of those drums in a completely different track.
The snare is sitting right next to the hi hat for example. There's is no way you can get a perfectly isolated snare recording without some hi hat bleeding through. There will be bleed though from the kick drum to the snare to the overheads picking up the cymbals etc, etc. Yeah, the cymbals. How the heck to you get audio recordings of cymbals when the drummer is playing the whole kit?
We're not talking midi drums here and I think you guys still don't understand what the Real Drums are. You're confusing midi drums using a sampler like Jamstix or BFD with a real kit sitting in a real studio.
Every time I see a suggestion about the separation of RealDrums in to single tracks I chuckle to myself. That is MIDI drums! If PGMusic had the drummers play a MIDI control drum set then release them as super MIDI drum tracks it might satisfy the request. I know that I would buy them.
If one thinks that MIDI drums do not sound real go to a MIDI drum loop company like http://groovemonkee.com/ and give a listen. They are real drummers playing on a MIDI drum set and they are not quantized. Actually BiaB MIDI drum tracks are very good also.
Thoughts from a guy who has been using MIDI single drum tracks for years.
The bumper sticker said "I'm a veterinarian, therefore I can drive like an animal". Suddenly I realized how many proctologists are on the road.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
It's even better than that Mario. The majority, not just a few but most of the Biab midi drums were done by real players on a midi kit. There's even a symbol in the style that tells you that but I can't remember what it is.
What these guys continually yell and scream about is already there. They just need to plug in a good quality drum module, play some of those and then they'll see.
I don't know guys, I'll say the same thing I did at that time.
RD's are AUDIO recordings of a real drummer on a real drum kit in a real studio. You know all the shows and pics you've seen of recording studios or concerts? The drum set might have 10 mics all around it but no matter how good you are as an engineer you are still recording the whole drum kit. You can get some half decent isolation between mics but it's not going to be good enough to use one of those drums in a completely different track.
The snare is sitting right next to the hi hat for example. There's is no way you can get a perfectly isolated snare recording without some hi hat bleeding through. There will be bleed though from the kick drum to the snare to the overheads picking up the cymbals etc, etc. Yeah, the cymbals. How the heck to you get audio recordings of cymbals when the drummer is playing the whole kit?
We're not talking midi drums here and I think you guys still don't understand what the Real Drums are. You're confusing midi drums using a sampler like Jamstix or BFD with a real kit sitting in a real studio.
Somebody please 'splain to me how you get isolated individual parts of a drum kit recordings out of this?
Bob
The beginning of the article you reference describes the whole process for recording a drum kit. It explains exactly how to isolate each individual drum sound, starting with the Kick drum. http://www.politusic.com/music/recording-tips/record-drums/
All those Microphones located all over the drum set, have a specific purpose. They are for sending an individual drum signal to the board. The proximity effect alone, allows this to happen. If you place a microphone 1 inch from the bottom of the snare drum, and another 1 inch from the top of the snare drum, you get 2 sounds almost 90 percent isolated from each other. The floor tom microphone is 99% isolated from the Hi-Hat microphone because they are usually 3 feet from each other. The proper GAIN settings on the microphones and the near field properties of drum mics increase the proximity effect. Sticking a Kick drum microphone on the Kick Drum skin, using a low pass filter setting that blocks the frequencies above 80HZ - 85hz allows for almost total KD isolation.
Its totally possible to isolate the Kick from the snare using the proper microphones, even in a live setting. Its even quite simple to separate the snare from the hi-hat. with the proper microphones, as they are creating sound in almost completely different frequency ranges. They do this isolation live and they do this in the studio.
Also, today a drummer can be playing a standard drum set miced, and be triggering samples of the same drum prerecorded in a studio. That trigger data can also be translated to MIDI data, and include both velocity, and release info. The resulting dual track output from the live mic and the sample can be blended at the sound board FOH or in the studio. These 2 signals are sent to different channels and can be recorded on different tracks. The Live drum microphone sound mixed with sampled/trigger sample are 2 full dynamic audio signals, and can easily produce individual drum sound for each drum, and cymbal.
The notion that you cannot separate individual drums into individual channels/tacks during a live or recording session is just not true. Studio engineers work hard to get this accomplished, so in later stages of production they can raise and lower, EQ, Pan, add different effects to the individual Drum parts.
Last edited by dga; 04/16/1606:08 AM.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
I don't know guys, I'll say the same thing I did at that time.
RD's are AUDIO recordings of a real drummer on a real drum kit in a real studio. You know all the shows and pics you've seen of recording studios or concerts? The drum set might have 10 mics all around it but no matter how good you are as an engineer you are still recording the whole drum kit. You can get some half decent isolation between mics but it's not going to be good enough to use one of those drums in a completely different track.
The snare is sitting right next to the hi hat for example. There's is no way you can get a perfectly isolated snare recording without some hi hat bleeding through. There will be bleed though from the kick drum to the snare to the overheads picking up the cymbals etc, etc. Yeah, the cymbals. How the heck to you get audio recordings of cymbals when the drummer is playing the whole kit?
We're not talking midi drums here and I think you guys still don't understand what the Real Drums are. You're confusing midi drums using a sampler like Jamstix or BFD with a real kit sitting in a real studio.
Somebody please 'splain to me how you get isolated individual parts of a drum kit recordings out of this?
Bob
Bob, you could easily get isolated drum parts by either: 1.Using a gate and setting the threshold so that it would only allow the sound pass through at a certain level, or 2. Muting any of the parts that bleed through the tracks.
For the second method you just need at the tracks and find the spots where the waveform has a higher peak.
Computer: Macbook Pro, 16 inch 2021 DAWs: Pro Tools, Logic, and Maschine plays drums, percussion, bass, steel pan, keyboard, music producer/engineer
I'm not requesting PG take their current RD and convert them to 4 tracks, I'm asking them to record/create RD with 1)Kick,2)Snare,3)Hi-hat,4)Overhead Mix as a 4 track Super RD. I've been in studio sessions where the engineer has 6 or more tracks of acoustic drums on separate tracks and there is no problem with bleed. The Kick can be leveled, EQed. Compressed, gated, filtered without affecting the other drums. Likewise with the other drum parts.
This is the flexibility I want to add to BIAB.
Last edited by dga; 04/16/1609:12 AM.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
Look Ma, No MIDI - but if you have a drum vsti it is an easy way to build your tracks exactly how you want them - it would be just good to have a real multi drum set choice - maybe with more pattern choices than just blue or green and 2 bar ending.
In the band in a box mixer there is room for another tab for a drum mixer - in power tracks/real band there is already a multitrack wav mixer for mixing a multi channel wav file - though you would need to be able to add fx.
MIDI drums for 1 is a giant step backwards from PG's real drums. Using MIDI drums for me is an impossibility. I have no MIDI sound sources that come any where near the professionalism of RDs.
PG's Real drums allow for 1,000's of kits to be called up by style with a minimum on 5 variations. I'm just requesting to improve on RD and when recording them split out the Kick,Snare,Hi-hat, and dedicate a track to X-Y overhead microphones.
Last edited by dga; 04/17/1605:46 PM.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
if you could use multichannel wavs for user track drums that would help, you could generate up and it would split to multi tracks in real band & power tracks.
I found some 13 channel multi track drums that work in real band & power tracks.
Should PG Music decide to provide multitrack drums in a future version of course I would use them but it is not a priority.
Most existing RealDrum tracks have single hits. You can copy and paste the hits to create a fill, put a cymbal crash where you need it, make a solo, etc. Whatever you create will perfectly match the rest of the RealDrum track because it's the same drums, played by the same drummer and recorded at the same time as the rest.
If you look at music construction sets or drum loops offered by companies like Drums On Demand or Big Fish Audio the stereo mix is standard and drum multitracks are premium add-ons for an additional cost.
Perhaps PG Music will offer the multitracks of a current RealDrum stereo mix or a future release to see how much demand there is.
apparently when they recorded the real drums, they just recorded the left & right channel out of the mixer direct to a stereo track so there were no multitrack recordings - not sure what they are doing these days when recording new real drums - I know other companies record them acoustically and with piezo sensors for a midi track also - just like guitars with midi pickups to give audio + midi ch11-16. I had to convert a pearl kit over to mesh heads and piezo sensors using a roland brain for gigs where the acoustic drums where too loud.
Should PG Music decide to provide multitrack drums in a future version of course I would use them but it is not a priority.
Most existing RealDrum tracks have single hits. You can copy and paste the hits to create a fill, put a cymbal crash where you need it, make a solo, etc. Whatever you create will perfectly match the rest of the RealDrum track because it's the same drums, played by the same drummer and recorded at the same time as the rest.
If you look at music construction sets or drum loops offered by companies like Drums On Demand or Big Fish Audio the stereo mix is standard and drum multitracks are premium add-ons for an additional cost.
Perhaps PG Music will offer the multitracks of a current RealDrum stereo mix or a future release to see how much demand there is.
Maybe I will be more specific, I will state I would like to see a BIAB PRO version with 8 or more instruments for fuller instrumentation. This would not be the standard BIAB, but a PRO version with enhancement. And more up sell $$$ for PG. The use of individual drums or rhythm instruments was one of my suggestions. If other companies offer MultiTrack drums as a premium add-on I think that just proves it is a useful product.[u][/u]
Last edited by dga; 04/19/1604:22 PM.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
I think the main problem is they are flat out trying to keep up with the products they now have - band in a box, real band, power tracks and now mac band in a box let alone power tracks or real band for mac. In the past band in a box and real band were released twice a year now with the mac version it's once at the end of the year - then they spend time fixing bugs - then move on to power tracks for April May release - then they start work on the mac version for mid year release - then fix the bugs in that - then move on to another end of year band in a box real band release.
So unless they hire more programmers there is not enough hours in the day.
Not me! I STRONGLY DISAGREE with the suggestion to add yet another variant to the BIAB packages. They are fairly confusing as it is. And I feel I am already paying plenty for the UltraPlusPak upgrade every year!
Some strong views are being expressed. Thanks dga for starting this discussion!
dga, I understand yout desire for more instrumentation however BiaB already has the capability; you just can't play more than eight tracks at a time. You can use F5 to change the instrument on any track (except drums) to something different. Also, by using the multi style feature to add additional part markers you can switch styles (and use the instruments within a style) at any bar.
BiaB has plenty of power to do many of the things people like to do; it's just knowing the features exist.
One additional thought, BiaB uses midi for things like harmony so there is a lot more midi than what you see for the instruments.
Some strong views are being expressed. Thanks dga for starting this discussion!
dga, I understand yout desire for more instrumentation however BiaB already has the capability; you just can't play more than eight tracks at a time. You can use F5 to change the instrument on any track (except drums) to something different. Also, by using the multi style feature to add additional part markers you can switch styles (and use the instruments within a style) at any bar.
BiaB has plenty of power to do many of the things people like to do; it's just knowing the features exist.
One additional thought, BiaB uses midi for things like harmony so there is a lot more midi than what you see for the instruments.
Jim Yes I originally wanted to suggest a PRO version of BIAB with enhanced features. If someone is satisfied with BIAB as it is that's fine. Now the only difference in the products are the number of styles/samples you get and whether they are compressed or the full AUDIOFILES themselves. Didn't want to force people to something more complex or higher priced. The Drum tracks, well that's my wish, so I didn't have to investigate MIDI drums.
This is getting way off my topic so I will also ask here and also start a new thread (How to implement Midi Drums i RB)
But, alas, I'm investigating the MIDI route for individual drum tracks. In RB there is a Drum Kit. Just can't seem to understand how to implement it to play sounds. I generated a MIDI drum track on one of my songs. But it plays only 2 sounds, neither of them sounds I would use, not a Kick or Snare sound. I tried to see how to use the drum kit but I can't even hear sound when I click the various drums. They change colors but now sound.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
As for midi drums you need the vst time info working (that they are fixing now) to be able to use a good vsti drum creator to make a drum track just how you want.
paying more money for the app it's self might be the only way to get a better app ? ?
Baloney! There are already too many options when you review the options page. And I do not believe you will get a better program by convincing 1% of the users to pay more! (And you won't get much more than that who will actually pay more anyway!) Many of us regular upgraders actually pay quite a bit year after year! Raise the price and I will skip the upgrade at least every other year! Other than the RealTracks I have not been that impressed by the improvements since I have been a customer (2012) and would not have paid a dime more for them. In fact, if they announced that the next upgrade did not include RealTracks, I'd sit that one out too!
If it's not money what is stopping them I wonder what it is, maybe all the other users around the world that don't come to the forum are happy with how it is and just keep buying it and pg keep doing what they are doing year after year, maybe it's just a few of us here that [*****] and complain and does not affect too much what pg does - I just don't know I'm at a loss. Sure I would love to pay the same like you but will it get me a 64bit or vst version ? maybe if I close my eyes and wish for it in the wishlist ? ? What's the best thing to do ?
If it's not money what is stopping them I wonder what it is, maybe all the other users around the world that don't come to the forum are happy with how it is and just keep buying it and pg keep doing what they are doing year after year, maybe it's just a few of us here that [*****] and complain and does not affect too much what pg does - I just don't know I'm at a loss. Sure I would love to pay the same like you but will it get me a 64bit or vst version ? maybe if I close my eyes and wish for it in the wishlist ? ?
I don't think there are nearly enough active users around here who could make a difference financially even if you convinced them to do so! Let's say there are maybe 50 active users and you could convince half of them to pony up $1,000 that would only be $25,000...not nearly enough to pay for a programming team to do the overhaul needed! But perhaps they have already invested in this and have a crack team secretly coding the killer 64-bit BIAB right now!
Quote:
What's the best thing to do ?
- Keep asking for improvements. - Wait for a competitor to arrive. - Keep figuring out work-arounds. And I am still DELIGHTED with the one you gave me here, http://www.pgmusic.com/forums/ubbthreads.php?ubb=showflat&Number=341704#Post341856 - Use it for what it does best (generating tracks) and ignore the rest while doing your real work in your DAW!
I’m pretty much satisfied with 2016 BIAB as it is. Would like to purchase the audio file version in the future. However, in my case, in making backing tracks for performance, I’ve switched to heavy use of high-end arranger keyboards. Their styles get better with each release and are rather amazing. I bounce back and forth between those and BIAB, depending on need and purpose. Sort of the best of both worlds.
I tried making some user track drums with one of the 13ch multichannel wav files above and generated it up in real band but no go - but when you open or drag the multichannel wav file in it will split it to separate tracks - it must use a different process than the user tracks - if they could fix that problem it would be an easy way of have multi drums in real band at least.
I’m pretty much satisfied with 2016 BIAB as it is. Would like to purchase the audio file version in the future. However, in my case, in making backing tracks for performance, I’ve switched to heavy use of high-end arranger keyboards. Their styles get better with each release and are rather amazing. I bounce back and forth between those and BIAB, depending on need and purpose. Sort of the best of both worlds.
J. Larry, I understand people who don't need anything more from BIAB or RB than the current release. What if BIAB was still exclusively a MIDI product as it was back in the early days, as was Cakewalk simply a MIDI sequencer, not until the Linn Drum was invented (thank you Roger!)was there a way to Sequence sampled music, and the digital music revolution was born. PG was a pioneer when they married sampling with sequencing to produce a rather slick digital music production program.
I happen to think that PG music has been positioned for years as the leader in ease of use music production, I also feel their product can fool even some of the slickest studio cats. Is it real or is it BIAB? SO to keep on top PG wants to know what do you wish for? I can wish for features PG might want to include in a future versions, that is what I was using this forum for. Its just a wish.
Last edited by dga; 04/21/1601:41 PM.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
some use it as a hobbyist - some to learn music - some for live backing - some for practice - some use it professionally in a studio to add 1 or more tracks to a project.
The more versatility these great apps have the better.
some use it as a hobbyist - some to learn music - some for live backing - some for practice - some use it professionally in a studio to add 1 or more tracks to a project.
The more versatility these great apps have the better.
SO Pipeline, do you think there should be a more powerful version of BIAB? Its easy to offer less product, just fewer RD and RT as it is now. I started the thread to wish for an expanded version of BIAB that had up to 8 tracks. Allowing for split tracks for the Kick, Snare, HiHat, and X-Y overhead stereo image of the KIT.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
Just responding to J. Larry "I’m pretty much satisfied with 2016 BIAB as it is."
everyone has a different use for it, so any wish/improvement is good, some people may never use that feature and others will. I have watch the forum in the past and lots of suggestion got a real hard time, but, then pg implemented them !
So as said above, unless they hire more programmers there is not enough hours in the day - this is all up to pg how they run their business and what they decide to do. But hey never stop dreaming that's the birth of great ideas that become reality.
""They could keep the existing band in a box how it is 32 for the older users that have been accustomed to it's interface for the last 20 years and make a new modern version that can be used like band in a box in an audio workstation like real band in a new c++ 64 application (along with multi drums).""
If they don't get around to it but then when they fix the vst time info you can then sync band in a box to a daw like reaper with as many drum tracks as you like or use a vst like Temper that will take a lot of drum tracks and they will all play in sync to band in a box.
... everyone has a different use for it, so any wish/improvement is good, some people may never use that feature and others will...
Like a 3/4 count-in for a song that's first bar is in 3/4. Now that would be useful.
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Just responding to J. Larry "I’m pretty much satisfied with 2016 BIAB as it is."
everyone has a different use for it, so any wish/improvement is good, some people may never use that feature and others will. I have watch the forum in the past and lots of suggestion got a real hard time, but, then pg implemented them !
So as said above, unless they hire more programmers there is not enough hours in the day - this is all up to pg how they run their business and what they decide to do. But hey never stop dreaming that's the birth of great ideas that become reality.
""They could keep the existing band in a box how it is 32 for the older users that have been accustomed to it's interface for the last 20 years and make a new modern version that can be used like band in a box in an audio workstation like real band in a new c++ 64 application (along with multi drums).""
If they don't get around to it but then when they fix the vst time info you can then sync band in a box to a daw like reaper with as many drum tracks as you like or use a vst like Temper that will take a lot of drum tracks and they will all play in sync to band in a box.
Pipeline I think these comments could start (have already started) several other threads. I don't see the relevance of your links here? If you wish PG Music would use a different programming language then wish for that. If you wish for the VST time sync to be fixed then wish for that. If you have already beaten those dead horses, ask PG why they did not consider these High Priority items.
I asked the simple question "SO Pipeline, do you think there should be a more powerful version of BIAB?" not JLarry Your post does not seem to relate to my original topic, offering an 8 track (More Powerful) version of BIAB called BIAB Pro for users who wish the drum parts were on separate channels.
Last edited by dga; 04/22/1608:28 AM.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
I asked the simple question "SO Pipeline, do you think there should be a more powerful version of BIAB?" not JLarry Your post does not seem to relate to my original topic, offering an 8 track (More Powerful) version of BIAB called BIAB Pro for users who wish the drum parts were on separate channels.
I have been asking for PGMusic to open all 16 channels (BiaB does have 16 channels) so the user can do with them what they want for a number of years now. That is one can use 16 channels for all MIDI, all RTs or both.
All I can speculate is that after years of modifying and adding to the original 32 bit code that to code new stuff without a major rewrite must be a monumental task.
The bumper sticker said "I'm a veterinarian, therefore I can drive like an animal". Suddenly I realized how many proctologists are on the road.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
I asked the simple question "SO Pipeline, do you think there should be a more powerful version of BIAB?" Your post does not seem to relate to my original topic, offering an 8 track (More Powerful) version of BIAB called BIAB Pro for users who wish the drum parts were on separate channels.
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
The 16 tracks is likely a holdover from MIDI origins. But every time this topic is brought up, I explain that the tracks you have available is not some arbitrary choice. Several tracks are used by harmony, and additional tracks can be used for separating guitar strings. Mario states the optimal solution: uncouple things and let the user decide. And then there's that other bank of 16 ...
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Slate VSX, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
How do you use these 16 tracks now, you mention they can be used for separating guitar strings, how? Can you split a piano keyboard? Matt? What do you mean when you say "then there's that other bank of 16..."
"When you help somebody else you are really helping yourself"
Hi DGA. This is something that has been around for a long time, but is probably pretty obscure knowledge now because it involves only MIDI.
Take a BIAB song and click on the .MID button (to the right of Save As). This brings up the Choose Destination dialog. Click on the Options button. You will see you can choose to write harmony to separate tracks, and/or write Guitar parts to 6 channels.
Add these together with the available instruments that everyone knows (piano, bass, strings etc.) and you can easily see where the 16 channels went.
As far as I can see, and you can look yourself, there is no option for splitting piano MIDI parts.
Now, about the second bank: many other music programs support two banks of 16 channels of MIDI.
And before anyone else gets excited, please remember that this is describing MIDI only, not RealTracks. All I'm doing is providing some background about how the program apparently was designed, decades before RealTracks were added. But there's no guarantee I'm correct.
Make sense?
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Slate VSX, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
"Your post does not seem to relate to my original topic, offering an 8 track (More Powerful) version of BIAB called BIAB Pro for users who wish the drum parts were on separate channels."
Sorry yes it would be great to have another version with 8 drum tracks but then others might want another with more instrument tracks then another with other features but knowing pg I don't think they will do that. Band in a box runs in memory so I don't know how many tracks it would be possible to have ? If you look back thru the forum you will see there is a need for a 64bit DAW RealBand in a Box version, something like that with the multi drum, extra tracks and features that can be used by professionals as well as hobbyist.
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window
In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
There are already too many options when you review the options page. And I do not believe you will get a better program by convincing 1% of the users to pay more! (And you won't get much more than that who will actually pay more anyway!) Many of us regular upgraders actually pay quite a bit year after year! Raise the price and I will skip the upgrade at least every other year! Other than the RealTracks I have not been that impressed by the improvements since I have been a customer (2012) and would not have paid a dime more for them. In fact, if they announced that the next upgrade did not include RealTracks, I'd sit that one out too!
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean