|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 48
Enthusiast
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 48 |
Elsewhere someone said RB is pretty "basic." What does it lack that most others have?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,395
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,395 |
VST timing for one
Basically this is because it is MIDI based (not sample based) which means less accurate audio edits at times.
Otherwise it likely does what you need, but the the path to getting satisfactory results may be different than other DAWs and the graphic interface less attractive.
For a lot of us the benefits of the regeneration features being available outweighs the sacrifice of the other aspects.
If I 'need' the other features I'll switch, but not until then.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,835
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,835 |
Joe5, have you tried using RealBand?
It's not as feature packed as other DAW's costing many hundreds of dollars, but it has some really great options, is very usable, and supports a pretty reasonable feature list. The fact that it integrates with Band In A Box styles is one of its strongest features.
You need to know what you need to do, and what are your expectations.
One thing is guaranteed, RealBand has features that you won't find in any other DAW (e.g. Track Generation for BiaB styles)
BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Professional & Windows 11, Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,853
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,853 |
Elsewhere someone said RB is pretty "basic." What does it lack that most others have? Have you used any other DAWs? If not you may find RB does the trick just fine. As others have said it has a single feature that other DAWs don't...the ability to directly interface with the amazing RealTracks. On the other hand, there are DAWs that are free and that cost as little as $60 that are far more feature-rich and way more state-of-the-art in their GUI. If that does not matter to you then you may be fine with RB. Personally I love my DAW to be packed with features and relatively bug-free. I find RB to be slow and glitchy with a clunky interface that I do not enjoy using. So, I use mainly BIAB and then go straight to my DAW (Reaper). If I want additional options in the RealTracks I will use RB in between to generate more RealTrack options but I try and finish in RB just as quickly as I can so I can get back to my modern DAW!
Last edited by JohnJohnJohn; 08/10/16 03:43 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,752
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,752 |
Similar to the ability to regenerate a portion of a track, RB has a feature called Multiriff. Multiriff generates 7 versions of the selected audio even to include the complete track.
You can audition each of the 7 multiriffs and select any one of them or save any number of the 7 to individual tracks to edit portions of each into a custom multiriff. The multiriff audio can extend beyond the beginning and end of the selected audio if you wish which helps to create a seamless and professional edit.
You can choose Multiriff from two options. Open multiriff to regenerate the current instrument or open Multiriff choosing a different instrument.
The result of multiriff is that you can create a custom track by auditioning hundreds of variations and edits in minutes that would take hours in BIAB. An added benefit of Multiriffs is that a midi track is created at the same time so that a midi instrument can be chosen to double the riff.
I recently created a guitar track of lead fills that consisted of 18 sections selected to place the fills. 7 tracks each of the 18 fills resulted in 126 takes of audio to choose the best fill for each section. Imagine having a session player doing 126 takes during a recording. There may be hours of recorded RealTracks for the Multiriff to review and generate new audio from.
Another feature I found on that project is by using two instruments from the same style often provides audio clips that compliment each instrument by generating similar riffs so that it sounds like two players working together at the same time during a recording session. This provides very unique and realistic sounding tracks.
Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 08/10/16 05:07 PM.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 697
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 697 |
Joe5: quite an impressive response to your question. Here are some videos you will want to see for more info: http://www.pgmusic.com/videos.realband.htmDE
Win 10, 64 bit, love my Lenovo T420, BIAB 2019 (613), RB 2019 (2)
Short term memory is getting shorter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,063
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,063 |
Joe, see my answer to this question in the other thread.
I'm in a fitness protection program. I'm been hiding from exercise.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,672
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,672 |
As I wrote....
Yeah, it's pretty basic. A simple down and dirty DAW. It gets the job done. However, it's not designed to go head to head with Sonar, Cubase, Ableton, or the Mac ProTools....at least not yet.
It has a number of good functions, the main one being it's ability to generate Real Tracks. '
It's lack of timing sync with VST's and awkward audio editing leave much to be desired if you're trying to use it as a production DAW on a music project.
I really gave it a try on a project a few years back. I was determined to complete a project using it. However, I ran into some issues that I could not resolve (and don't remember the details on now) so I had to move the tracks to my Sonar DAW to complete the project as I intended.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 48
Enthusiast
|
|
OP
Enthusiast
Joined: Aug 2016
Posts: 48 |
As I said on the other thread (didn't mean to have this conversation going in 2 places, the other one just kind of led there  ), thanks for the replies! J3, it's funny you mentioned Reaper as that's the only DAW I've tried to date and didn't care for the interface at all. It's all so subjective. But as I said in the other thread, it was a pretty cursory look; I'll probably revisit that and try a few others, but my needs are (I think) not too complex; it's just me as a solo artist on a synth, so much fewer concerns about stuff like mic placement, mixing etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,752
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,752 |
I wasn't aware of this thread and posted some of the additional benefits and features other and the ability to generate tracks in the BIAB 101 thread in the Recording Forum.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
|
eddie1261
Unregistered
|
|
eddie1261
Unregistered
|
I am interested in knowing how many of those 126 tracks sounded almost exactly the same if not eerily similar. We had a coincidence where Floyd used the same sample and real track as I did and one of his songs started with the exact same riff as one of mine. On one of my current songs I did a multitrack 8 bar solo section, and then did it again, and then again. That made 21 tracks. Of those 21, 14 of them sounded so similar that it was obvious that there were not a lot of sample snippets to choose from in a section of a song that went 1-4-1-1-5-4-1-5..... I ended up cutting and pasting from that pallet and coming up with the intro I needed, but that showed some limitation as far as what is available in Real Band. And you really can't switch real tracks as far as performer, because you'd end up going from Les Paul to Tele to Strat and very different tonal properties, so if you use a Brent Mason real track, you have to use only that Brent Mason real track for the whole thing. for this CD, which is SLOWLY in the works, I am creating sample solos and bringing in players to play live based on those generated segments. The sound generation feature is obviously the bread and butter of PG products, but I now see why people pull the generated tracks out of RB and move it to a better DAW. I just started using Protools and though it takes time to dump tracks to individual wav files and then import to Protools, woking in Protools is MUCH better as far as the DAW side of things. Of course Protools can't create music, but it never claimed to.
Last edited by eddie1261; 08/11/16 07:59 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 697
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Dec 2014
Posts: 697 |
Joe5 " it's funny you mentioned Reaper as that's the only DAW I've tried to date and didn't care for the interface at all. It's all so subjective." I use Reaper, it's the most flexible DAW I've ever used. I could take up paragraphs praising but I won't. It's extremely inexpensive $60. You can watch Version 5 for free at: http://reaper.fm/videos.phpKenny Goya (?) is the author and has dozens of Version 4 at: https://www.groove3.com/PS: You can buy a monthly pass for $15 per month (and see hundreds (all) tutorials). DE
Win 10, 64 bit, love my Lenovo T420, BIAB 2019 (613), RB 2019 (2)
Short term memory is getting shorter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,395
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,395 |
There are a few variations of real tracks that work well together, don't always have to 'use only that Brent Mason real track for the whole thing'.
Plus, guitarists use FX and change their sound all the time. One section can be one RT and another be a different one, be they verse, chorus or bridge (or solo) whatever.
Your average listener is not going to think about what guitar was used ..
FWIW I find mixing different styles/RTs to be quite enjoyable.
From what I understand, chord changes are given preference (weight) during generation. In other words, this section works well for this change, this one OK, etc
So this would make some generations weighted to use a given phrase at the opportune time more often than another. They do try to 'randomize' it, but that includes using a phrase at the beginning of one multiriff and again at the end of another.
Who knows?
Either one could be inspiring. A signature lick too early in a solo may make the rest mundane, while if you end a nice solo on that same really cool lick it may 'make' it .. so location can be a factor also.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,752
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,752 |
"I am interested in knowing how many of those 126 tracks sounded almost exactly the same if not eerily similar." Here you go Eddie. Say I Do
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
|
eddie1261
Unregistered
|
|
eddie1261
Unregistered
|
Was it 126 guitars or 126 between guitars and sax?
Great use of panning as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,752
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,752 |
126 guitars. I did the same for the sax but did not count them. There were not as many for the sax and I did them after the guitars and had the routine figured out by that time.
This is a later version than I originally posted here on the forum and it reflects changes in lyrics, mixing, panning from suggestions made by several members. Steve Young made the panning suggestion.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,672
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,672 |
how many of those 126 tracks sounded almost exactly the same if not eerily similar. We had a coincidence where Floyd used the same sample and real track as I did and one of his songs started with the exact same riff as one of mine. ...........14 of them sounded so similar that it was obvious that there were not a lot of sample snippets to choose from in a section of a song .............. that showed some limitation as far as what is available in Real Band. And you really can't switch real tracks as far as performer, because you'd end up going from Les Paul to Tele to Strat and very different tonal properties, so if you use a Brent Mason real track, you have to use only that Brent Mason real track for the whole thing. for this CD, which is SLOWLY in the works, I am creating sample solos and bringing in players to play live based on those generated segments. The sound generation feature is obviously the bread and butter of PG products, but I now see why people pull the generated tracks out of RB and move it to a better DAW. I just started using Protools and though it takes time to dump tracks to individual wav files and then import to Protools, woking in Protools is MUCH better as far as the DAW side of things. Of course Protools can't create music, but it never claimed to. Yep.... I have heard some folk's songs that have similar licks in them, and that's to be expected since we're all working from the same palate of samples. Ditto on the guitar tone.... kinda hard sometimes to jump from track to track when, like you said, ones a Strat and the other is a Les Paul. My song THE BEST CHRISTMAS.... on my music page somewhere.... has a compilation of 5 tracks being used to get the B Mason solo. The piano's are 3 tracks I think.... I'm a big fan of using live players for the lead guitars and even the rhythms because of that issue.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
|
eddie1261
Unregistered
|
|
eddie1261
Unregistered
|
It can be tedious stitching together a good solo, but the end result can be so remarkable that people can't believe it is not a live person. One of the songs on my CD, Here goes nuttin', has a pedal steel solo in it and I got an email from a pedal steel player that asked "Who played that solo?? I don't think I could duplicate that." And that solo was a compilation from 8 different iterations of an 8 bar passage. All cutting and pasting.... and much experimentation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 7,697 |
Nobody has mentioned this so maybe you're doing it already. Are you aware that you can change the chord grid for each generation? Just make sure you're only generating a new track and leaving the existing ones alone.
Solo's especially tend to float over the chords, not necessarily strictly following them. Try using different but related changes and see what happens. In the key of C try using Dm for 8 bars or make the whole thing EbMaj7 if the tune is in Cm. You can try some of the common jazz changes like using tritone subs which would be using an F#7 for a C7 once or twice during a chorus.
You can put a swing solo against an even beat or vice versa. For drums I'll make 3 or 4 completely different drum tracks with different RD's plus changing the part markers on the chord grid. That puts the fills in different places plus activates the substyles and gives you tons of choices.
Bob
Biab/RB latest build, Win 11 Pro, Ryzen 5 5600 G, 512 Gig SSD, 16 Gigs Ram, Steinberg UR22 MkII, Roland Sonic Cell, Kurzweil PC3, Hammond SK1, Korg PA3XPro, Garritan JABB, Hypercanvas, Sampletank 3, more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RealBand
|
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,752
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2013
Posts: 8,752 |
Good point Bob. I do that sometimes and along that same thought, I may experiment with changing the song style during the chorus. I picked up the idea from songs like Gene Chandler's Duke Of Earl Charlie
Last edited by Charlie Fogle; 08/23/16 11:05 PM.
BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Season's Greetings!
Wishing everyone a happy, healthy holiday season—thanks for being part of our community!
The office will be closed for Christmas Day, but we will be back on Boxing Day (Dec 26th) at 6:00am PST.
Team PG
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window
In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe
This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®
With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Video: New User Interface (GUI)
Join Tobin as he takes you on a tour of the new user interface in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®! This modern GUI redesign offers a sleek new look with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, and a smoother workflow. The brand-new side toolbar puts track selection, the MultiPicker Library, and other essential tools right at your fingertips. Plus, our upgraded Multi-View lets you layer multiple windows without overlap, giving you a highly flexible workspace. Many windows—including Tracks, Piano Roll, and more—have been redesigned for improved usability and a cleaner, more intuitive interface, and more!
Watch the video.
You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!
Introducing XPro Styles PAK 10 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
We've just released XPro Styles PAK 10 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) with 100 brand new RealStyles, plus 28 RealTracks and RealDrums!
Few things are certain in life: death, taxes, and a brand spankin’ new XPro Styles PAK! In this, the 10th edition of our XPro Styles PAK series, we’ve got 100 styles coming your way! We have the classic 25 styles each from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, and rounding out this volume's wildcard slot is 25 styles in the Praise & Worship genre! A wide spanning genre, you can find everything from rock, folk, country, and more underneath its umbrella. The included 28 RealTracks and RealDrums can be used with any Band-in-a-Box® 2026 (and higher) package.
Here’s just a small sampling of what you can look forward to in XPro Styles PAK 10: Soft indie folk worship songs, bumpin’ country boogies, gospel praise breaks, hard rockin’ pop, funky disco grooves, smooth Latin jazz pop, bossa nova fusion, western swing, alternative hip-hop, cool country funk, and much more!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the XPro Styles PAKs 1 - 10 are on sale for only $29 ea (Reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of XPro Styles PAKs.
Video: XPro Styles PAK 10 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
Introducing Xtra Styles PAK 21 – Now Available for Windows Band-in-a-Box 2025 and Higher!
Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Windows & Mac Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher) is here with 200 brand new RealStyles!
We're excited to bring you our latest Xtra Styles PAK installment—the all new Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box version 2025 (and higher)!
Rejoice, one and all, for Xtra Styles PAK 21 for Band-in-a-Box® is here! We’re serving up 200 brand spankin’ new styles to delight your musical taste buds! The first three courses are the classics you’ve come to know and love, including offerings from the rock & pop, jazz, and country genres, but, not to be outdone, this year’s fourth course is bro country! A wide ranging genre, you can find everything from hip-hop, uptempo outlaw country, hard hitting rock, funk, and even electronica, all with that familiar bro country flair. The dinner bell has been rung, pickup up Xtra Styles PAK 21 today!
In this PAK you’ll discover: Energetic folk rock, raucous train beats, fast country boogies, acid jazz grooves, laid-back funky jams, a bevy of breezy jazz waltzes, calm electro funk, indie synth pop, industrial synth metal, and more bro country than could possibly fit in the back of a pickup truck!
Special offers until December 31st, 2025!
All the Xtra Styles PAKs 1 - 21 are on special for only $29 each (reg $49), or get all 21 PAKs for $199 (reg $399)! Order now!
Learn more and listen to demos of the Xtra Styles PAK 21.
Video: Xtra Styles PAK 21 Overview & Styles Demos: Watch now!
Note: The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 21 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version because they need the RealTracks from the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics85,391
Posts791,583
Members39,875
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean