Originally Posted By: jazzmammal
And what's cool about this place Joe is how many well known software companies do you get to talk to the big guy directly?

lol - true. Although I doubt Bill Gates would want to hear it either. smile And again, it clearly has a ton of capability, and it sounds like it's made great strides since 08, design-wise.


Originally Posted By: Noel96
I just want to point out that the above is both incorrect and unfair. PG Music are a very progressive company. Peter Gannon and his team have created an outstanding product that has made significant developmental strides in music and backing track production as computer technology has grown. As far as I can tell, 'complacency' is not in Dr Gannon's vocabulary.
For the sake of argument, I'll concede that I can't say the whys and wherefores, and that certainly wasn't meant about any one person.....it was just an initial impression based on what I saw of this version, and my impression is there are more than a few (including avid users) who would not disagree. Maybe it was simply a lack of good UI (or as it's called now days, "UX") designers....

Quote:
Comparing the 2008 version of BIAB to today's version is like comparing 2008 computers to today's computers.
Ah, not really. 2008 computers were well designed, given the technology of the time. In fact, they weren't all that far behind today's PCs.

Anyway, enough on all that. It's certainly worth a look, regardless of the UI, and I have already said so to others. See I'm not all bad. smile



Last edited by joe5; 08/15/16 01:37 PM.