|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 484
Journeyman
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 484 |
With the variety of options of affordable home recording software available, I am interested in getting your thoughts about the software you use. What are the features you like most/least about the product?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,167
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,167 |
Realband
Works a treat with my multitrack sound cards, works well with multiple soundcards and allows me to get a LOT of tracks and effects running at once
I like the way the inserts for the tracks and outputs work in the mixer, and the number of available AUX slots is also very nice.
I have Sonar, and a couple others, but really enjoy Realband
It is intuitive (for me).
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 19,832
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 19,832 |
I agree with rharv. I have Sonar Home Studio, Realband, Powertracks, Audacity and tend to use Realband more than any of the others. I must admit, though, that I like the way that I can vertically expand tracks in Sonar as this allows for more minute control with volume envelopes.
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,037
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,037 |
I use SONAR, which I learned years before Real Band. I edit audio files in Adobe Audition.
BIAB 2025 Win Audiophile. Software: Studio One 7 Pro, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Roland Integra-7, Presonus 192 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 8,502 |
I find this type of discussion kind of useless here at a site meant to promote recording software. I am not picking on you, as it is a very good and valid question, but one better served at a neutral site.
Here you are going to get users of PG music stuff. And a few like Matt who use both. I like something Mac said a while back, on another site. There is no swiss army knife program, each has it's value, and most will do a darned good job. After all a swiss army knife does everything but very little extremely well. Any good tradesman has a full array of tools at his disposal.
With Recording software, I feel it boils down to need and budget. Powertracks here is a darned nice program for the money, it is feature rich. Certainly not up to Sonar Producer in features, but still solid and capable. Realband is Powertracks on steriods. Take PT and mix in a nice dose of Band in a Box
For me it depends on the process. I use Realband and Band in a Box for from scratch creations, as a well Real band for live work. For polishing a tune and fine detail work, i use a program called Multitrackstudio. I feel it is one of the best and most stable, not to mention easiest to use and setup. But there are things that I like RealBand better for. So i keep a tool box full of tools.
Grab one and learn it, that is the way to get things done. Don't do what i did in the beginning try four or five and never settle into a process. When i finally did that it all came together.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2025, Realband, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 9 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 825
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 825 |
I'm from the MultiTrackStudio camp as well. It's by far the easiest to use, and never a hickup. The new touchscreen features in version 6 and the multichannel inputs are neat. I must agree with robh though, get into one and stick with it because even the most simple programs can get fantastic results nowadays. The early Beatles stuff etc was done on four track. Not being a computer expert stability is the keyword for me, and as far as I can tell the PGmusic stuff is also very stable. I haven't tried Realband for doing any recording as such, I guess it's what you're used to. Realband and BIAB however do seem to have what is probably the closest thing to a "talent" function 
Chris
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 47
Enthusiast
|
|
Enthusiast
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 47 |
Power Tracks has been my primary daw right from the time it first had the ability to record. I keep trying out other programs and find that they offer no real advantages to me, though I do have an older version of Audition I run occasionally.
the Insolent LadEnough small empty boxes thrown into a big empty box fill it full. ~Carl Sandburg
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,258
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,258 |
I use sonar 6 as I had got used to it before real band. However, I also use sound forge 5 for mixing and adobe audition for the final sound tweaks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,416
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 2,416 |
I use Vegas, not for the features so much (although their particular flavor of non-linear recording is simple and beautiful) but because I get the cleanest, clearest signal with the most headroom using it. Go fig.
Best, Tom SmithWin10/64 • i7-8700K • 24 GB RAM BIAB 2025 • Reaper 7 • Izotope MPS AKG C1000S • IK iRig I/O Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,058
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,058 |
I think we all use or have tried the software mentioned above. If you don't mind, I'd like to also introduce the idea that all the features that the different software have, doesn't help more than what's in your head.
I've been listening to some of the different songs lately and realizing that the accompanying music in many of the professional produced tracks is rather mediocre. So where is the advantage in having all the equipment, and talent and only producing an average backing for a vocal.
I' m not putting down the technology we have at hand but sometimes I get caught up in the technology instead of creating music. I then have to remind myself that if I will stop and let my right brain into the mix, I might make better music.
It might be interesting to make a backing track for any popular song with the simplest software and the more limited synths, add a quality vocal and ask 100 people what they thought of the cover version. I have a feeling that few would notice the difference in the cover backing as compared to the orginal song. Most will coment on the vocal not the backing.
BTW, I think BIAB,RB,RT's could produce something 95% or better as compared to most backing music for a lot of songs.
Just a thought
Wyndham
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,233
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 12,233 |
Pro Tools 8.0.1 with MBox. Way more capability than I understand or need, but once up and running it is really sexy software.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 897
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 897 |
 Very astute post...in many ways... (I told you I loved you, ....NOW GET OUT!!) Ooops, just listening to that rendition of that great scat tune on the fab Anita O'Day/Jack Sheldon-arranged CD...'RULES OF THE ROAD"! --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Back to your comment: Glad you dig..or..mentioned... the vocalist, up front ...and that happens in clubs when there's also a competent band singer!! No matter how punked-out (out of step) the backing band may be...the chick or male voice may just pull the whole package together as a groovy listenable experience. As far as "competing software"... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I must say I attained good results completing six albums with minimal effort,in my home studio..... using Sony's "Sound Forge" software, for it's many tweaking possibilies as well as nifty batch uploading... I've also used Sonar, Acid, etc., for years. If I had the money, which i DON'T, darn it, I'd jump on the upgrade price for SoundForge 10+. If I did have the bread, I guarantee that It'll chase my "weary-blues away"....!! (Shake it, baby....Shake those blues away. And,....Anita...do another chorus of "I TOLD YOU I LOVED YOU......NOW, GET OUT!!) As another song goes, in tribute to "PG Music's Real Attack Software": "NOBODY DOES IT BETTER!! :
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,719
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,719 |
Lenovo YOGA 900 Window s 10 Home 64bit M4 pro Mac mini 1tb HD 24GB mem casio wk7500 presonus audiobox i2 usb interface
casio wk-7500
biab & realband 2025 everything pk both with Current builds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,122
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 1,122 |
I guess I'm a slow learner, because once I start to get the hang of a program, I HATE to change. Over the years I've dabbled with Cakewalk, Sonar, then Jammer and some daw from voyetra, then I found power tracks, then realband.
While I must admit I am always tempted to try new stuff, for example I love the look and the praise I'm hearing for MultitrackStudio. Seems to be really a cool system, but then it kinda limits me working with realtracks. Mostly what I do is build backing tracks and the occasional writers demo. BIAB and RB have been a godsend for those activities, and the time saved by popping in a realtrack solo, verses trying to come close to playing something as good, is worth more than I can explain.
We musos........tend to listen differently than the average humanoid. We listen "for" certain things, most people listen "To" the basic mix and arrangement. Most could tell you if its a good midi fiddle or a real fiddle or a realtrack. Most of us can, although, I'm not sure it really matters as long as it sounds good and does what we want.
For now I'm sticking with RB and PT and BIAB, and maybe a little Jammer, cuz, well, they do what I need, at a very affordable price, and I'm kinda getting used to them. On top of that, the customer support is the best I've ever seen.
Yamaha, Roland, and many others, might as well not have any support. But I can't wait to get my $$$$$$$$$ together for the new S910 yamaha keyboard, which is strange since I'm not really a keyboard player.
PG meets my needs, even if it doesn't quite meet all my wants, but they do keep working on it, and they keep it affordable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,719
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 3,719 |
i was referring, though i should said So, to the idea of composing with a touch screen which most of us probably won't have anytine soon i especially appreciated the keyboard and string instrument demo
Lenovo YOGA 900 Window s 10 Home 64bit M4 pro Mac mini 1tb HD 24GB mem casio wk7500 presonus audiobox i2 usb interface
casio wk-7500
biab & realband 2025 everything pk both with Current builds
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 484
Journeyman
|
|
OP
Journeyman
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 484 |
Myself, I use Home Studio and was interested in how BIAB's product compares in terms of its comfort for folks having come from another product.
As for why I posed the question on this discussion board? When I look at the screen shots of this product, though it looks very exciting what BIAB can do, I admit getting overwhelmed to where I back away again. How my brain ingests data like this is to find comparisons to what else is out there to determine conclusions on how long will it take a person like myself to begin to use BIAB with the degree of proficiency as I have grown to using the other types of home recording products available. Having you all share your experiences with other products and now with BIAB has been very helpful to me. I thank everyone who has shared!
RickeG
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Quote:
Myself, I use Home Studio and was interested in how BIAB's product compares in terms of its comfort for folks having come from another product.
Band in a Box?
I thought this was a comparison of sequencing softwares. I think so did everybody else.
Band in a Box is an autoaccompaniment software that can provide a pro level backup band to your tracks. All you have to do is enter the chords and pick a style.
PowerTracks Pro Audio is a static sequencing software made by PGMusic and it is this that should be compared with other static sequencers such as everything mentioned here so far.
RealBand combines the autoaccompaniment ability of Band in a Box with the multitrack sequencing of PowerTracks.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 123
Apprentice
|
|
Apprentice
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 123 |
I bought Sonar 4 Studio edition back in 2004 and I have it installed on my Dell Latitude 610 laptop. One thing I was trying to do is edit an audio track and I'm like how do I do this. With Cubase, I just highlight and edit but when I highlight the track in SONAR 4...a piece of the track moves and the rest stays.....I am like what in the world is this? I guess, I haven't really dug in with reading the manual....................but ???????????????. Maybe I need to get deeper into the manual and HELPS section.
--------------------
Jacobins
Jacobins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 38,502 |
Quote:
Maybe I need to get deeper into the manual and HELPS section.
--------------------
Jacobins
A very good thing to start doing.
This is a highly technical situation and there are many different softwares that can do this job. Each one may or may not do something in the same way as the other one does. We must use that manual quite a lot when changing to a new software, we must also recognize that there may be a longer learning curve when moving from one software to another, too.
This is analagous, in my opinion, to those who think that they can figure out how to run the 24 channel mixer board by just jumping in and twisting knobs and moving faders until they "hit" on proper settings. Ain't gonna happen. I've heard and seen people who should know better doing things like using the Mic Trim control as a Volume Control, trying to run the Gain Staging bass ackwards, trying to run a hot live sound reinforcement system totally flat including monitors, all sorts of things that could have rather easily been avoided had they first sat down and studied and understood the manuals that come with the things.
If you find a term that you don't understand, underline it or otherwise make a note of it, then FIND OUT about that term. Use the Internet, search for terms, there are plenty of glossaries, dictionaries and tutorials to be found these days for just about any subject. And then there are forums like this one, too.
KNOW, don't guess.
--Mac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Off-Topic
|
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 572
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 572 |
This discussion is helpful, but somewhat overwhelming with the many software products out there. I've got a basic version of Cubase, but have not used it. The reason----I don't have an interface as yet and don't know which would be the best investment. I'd like to record guitars and electric keyboard with Realband. I suppose any USB or firewire unit would work? I'd hate to buy something and then find out it won't work, is too limited in options, or some other problem. The cost is not a factor. I'd buy anything that's easy to use and will do the job effectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
Join the conversation on our forum.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac Videos
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.
Reference this forum post for One-Stop Shopping of our Band-in-a-Box® 2025 Mac Videos — we’ll be adding more videos as they’re released!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Mac is Here!
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.
If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 Italian Version is Here!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box 2025 - Italiano
RealBand 2025 - Italiano
Band-in-a-Box 2025 French Version is Here!
Bonjour à tous,
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
BIAB 2025 - francisation
RealBand 2025 - francisation
Voilà, enjoy!
Band-in-a-Box 2025 German Version is Here!
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
Stay up to date—get the latest update now!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums58
Topics84,313
Posts777,637
Members39,617
| |
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean