Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#462304 03/15/18 06:07 AM
Songwriting
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,664
PG Music Staff
OP Offline
PG Music Staff
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,664
Hello PG Music Forum!

Wanted to share this as a reminder with how important this concept this. In the video below it shows how to go through the circle of fifths for major keys. Very helpful reference for beginners and a great reminder for novices!

You can find the video below:



Cheers,
Joe
Songwriting
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443

Joe,

My next song goes:

G Db F# Ab11 C B Eb G# C G F Gminor7b9add11+5

Are you saying, that's.....wrong???

Songwriting
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,664
PG Music Staff
OP Offline
PG Music Staff
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 1,664
Good one David! Haha -- This was mean't to be a reference of basic concepts. As the saying goes once you know the rules you can break them in creative ways smile


Cheers,
Joe
Songwriting
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 12
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 12

Here are a few pop songs that use the circle of fifths.
Each of these songs uses the circles of fifths
for at least four chords in a row.

You Never Give Me Your Money - The Beatles
Crocodile Rock - Elton John (in the bridge)
Wild World - Cat Stevens (in the verse)
How Can I Tell You - Cat Stevens
Can We Still Be Friends - Todd Rundgren
I Will Survive - Gloria Gaynor
Happy Heart - Andy Williams and Petula Clark (in the chorus)
Killing Me Softly With His Song - Roberta Flack (both the verse and chorus)
My Favorite Things - from The Sound Of Music
This Guy's In Love With You - Burt Bacharach
Changes - Phil Ochs
The War Is Over - Phil Ochs
What's That I Hear - Phil Ochs
Is There Anybody Here - Phil Ochs
When I'm Gone - Phil Ochs
One Way Ticket Home - Phil Ochs

Phil Ochs has probably used the circle of fifths more
frequently than any other songwriter i am familiar with.
Although i would not be surprised to find out that there
are some Todd Rundgren ballads from the early 70s
that also use it.

The most well-known piece of classical music to use it is
Vivaldi's The Four Seasons in the Winter section.


Matador is beautiful,a symphony of style
Excitement is ecstatic, passion places bets
Gracefully he bows to ovations that he gets
But the hands that are applauding are slippery with sweat
And saliva is falling from their smiles

Phil Ochs- Crucifixion

Songwriting
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,947
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 20,947
The absolute classic Circle of Fifths has to be Henry Mancini's 'Moon River' (lyrics by Johnny Mercer). Circle of Fifths is continuous throughout the entire song.


BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Songwriting
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443
Hey Folks,

I am trying to get a deeper understanding of what people mean by "following the circle of fifths" and am using the Moon River citation as an example.

As far as I understand it, the Circle of Fifths essentially lets you see the 7 chords that are "logical" to use in any key, though you are free to borrow chords or "steal" from related keys as long as they sound nice.

At the bottom is an image of that representation in the C of Key. When I am in C, I often use Eb, G# and Bb and Gm too for the surprise effect, or Fm when I want to get all John Lennon.

But here are the chords (more or less, taken from the web) for Moon River.

The song essentially uses most of the chords that are logical in the key of C, plus others that just sound good, like Fm7.

In light of the wheel, what do we mean when we say we are "following" the circle of fifths? I hope I am not being dense and it is an honest question. Do we mean we are using it as a reference of acceptable chords, or that we are following a specific hop-scotching sequence of sorts? I have always been intrigued when people have use the word "following" in this context and have always wanted to know what that means.

Not to say the term "following" has been used in this thread yet, but I hear that term a lot.


Moon River

C Am F Em

F Em

Dm6 E7 Am C

F A#7

Am Fm75 B Em Am Dm7 G7



Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
Circle of Fifths.jpg (40.45 KB, 268 downloads)
Songwriting
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,196
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,196
Hi David,

Back in my days following the circle of fifths meant any chord can come after the tonic but then you use the circle of fifths to return to the tonic chord. For example the tonic is C and the second chord is F#m. You would then follow the circle of fifths, starting on the F#m and going counter clock wise back to C. This example would bring the F#m chord to any form of a B, E, A, D, G then the tonic C. In Moon River it would be the last five chords, i.e. Fm75 B Em Am Dm7 G7.

BUT in music ALL rules can be broken. A tritone can be a substitute for a dominate 7th, i.e. C#7 to a C (tonic). A VIm a substitute for a I, etc.

YMMV


My boss calls me "the computer".
Nothing to do with intelligence. I go to sleep if left unattended for 15 minutes.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
MarioD #462800 03/18/18 09:32 AM
Songwriting
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443
Ah! Thanks Mario!

So the riddle is solved!

Thanks oh mighty Sphinx!

Genius. I shall enter this into a template right now!*

smile

Do I get a degree or something you can mail me, like a diploma, now that I have taken the Mario Class?

* But I assume you are subbing Fm7b5 for the F#m7 in this example? Otherwise you are a LONG way from home if you start at Fm per se.

I am fascinated by this.

More is more.

Lay it on me.

Songwriting
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 109
B
Apprentice
Offline
Apprentice
B
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 109
I've never thought too much about "following" the circle of fifths, although I do so occasionally.
I find it helps a lot in sight transposing chord progressions. If you go clockwise, it becomes a circle of fourths.


Boyd
Win10 - 16GB-RAM - BiaB 2019 - Mixbus 4 - Slate Bundle - Komplete 10 - Ozone 8 - Neutron 2 - Waves Gold
Ample Sound Guitars & Basses - Pianoteq 6 - SSD5 - SD3 - JamStix 4 - Omnisphere - UVI Falcon - EastWest Play
Sonarworks Reference 4 -
Songwriting
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,196
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,196
Yes, Fm7b5 is a substitute for F#m7.
Fm7b5= F - Ab(G#) - Cb(B) - Eb(D#)
B = B- F#-D#(Eb)

Notice the b5 of Fm7b5 is them same note as the B of the B chord. Also note that the 7th of Fm7b5 is the same as the 3rd of the B chord. The F and/or the Ab(G#) modulate to the F# of the B chord.

JonD and I like playing chord games like this. That is what non-conventional chord can we place next! We try to have one note that is the same in both chords, however sometimes it doesn't happen.

I hope this helps.


My boss calls me "the computer".
Nothing to do with intelligence. I go to sleep if left unattended for 15 minutes.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Songwriting
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,196
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,196
Originally Posted By: boydbob
I've never thought too much about "following" the circle of fifths, although I do so occasionally.
I find it helps a lot in sight transposing chord progressions. If you go clockwise, it becomes a circle of fourths.



Exactly. The circle of 5ths, also called the circle of 4ths, is there as a guide line and not an absolute rule. Most songs do not follow the circle of 5ths to a tee. However if you look you will find chord progression within a song that do. For instance the VIm-IIm-V-I found in many songs is in the circle of fifths.


My boss calls me "the computer".
Nothing to do with intelligence. I go to sleep if left unattended for 15 minutes.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
MarioD #462840 03/18/18 12:44 PM
Songwriting
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,080
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,080
Originally Posted By: MarioD
Yes, Fm7b5 is a substitute for F#m7.

I'm not entirely convinced of this, mostly because there's an F instead of an F# in the chord.

To my uneducated ear, the Fm7b5 is functioning more like an altered B chord that it resolves into a less-altered B chord..

Since the chord is mostly minor thirds, the B-D# interval sticks out because my ear wants a strong interval.

Just my 2 cents.


-- David Cuny

My virtual singer development blog
Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
Songwriting
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 12
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 12
Sorry, David and Mario, but tbe circle of fifths has nothing to do with being
'logical' or 'following'. I did study music theory in college.
The circle of fifths is merely a chord progression in
which each of the chords has a certain mathematical relation to
the preceding chord. Each chord is exactly five semitones tones higher than
the previous chord. You can use it for different purposes, but the only
requirement for a chord progression to be a circle of fifths is that the
chords be in a certain mathematical relation to each other.

In other words, let's say that you play an A chord. Now it does not matter
if it is an A major or minor or 7th or 11th chord or a diminished chord. If you
want to use a circle of fifths chord progression the next chord you play
would be a D chord (again it doesn't matter if it is major minor 9th etc.),
which is 5 semitones up from an A chord.

The next chord you play would be 5 semitones up, a G chord. Then another 5 semitones up would be a C chord. So, if you keep doing this 12 times you will be going from A to D to G to C to F to A# to D# to G# to C# to F# to B to E to A. So, in 12 steps, by using the circle of fifths, you will end up right where you started (it does not matter what chord you started on) which is why it is called a 'circle', because you eventually come back, after 12 chords, to the same chord you started on.

Now, if you are only using 3 chords that are in a circle of fiths progression, let's say G to C to F, then that does not really qualify as a circle of fiths progression. You really need to use at least 4 chords, such as G to C to F to A#, to qualify as an official circle of fifths progression, although that is not a hard and fast rule.

The importance of the circle of fifths progression is that it can make your music sound more interesting. The reason it is making your music sound more interesting is because you are frequently modulating to a different key. For example, if you are in the key of G and you play a C chord
you are still in the key of G. But if you then play a F chord you are now either in the key of F or the key of C, depending on which chords you play next. And if you keep playing even more chords in the circle of fifths you will continue to modulate to different keys and this will keep your listening audience alert and intrigued.

Of course, if you are interested in writing top 40 style songs, or songs for film, tv, or ads, you should never use the circle of fifths, because, in those styles of music, they are just looking for musically boring songs that sound similar to songs the listeners have heard before. Things were alot different back in the 60s and 70s when there was alot more musical experimentation, in the top 40, than in the past few decades.

To sum up, the circle of fifths is merely a chord progression in which every chord is 5 semitones higher than the previous chord and it can be used anywhere in a song, verse, chorus or bridge, and it will make your song sound more interesting and more musically sophisticated.

But do not be hesitant about using the circle of fifths just because it is based on a
mathematical pattern. After all, all music is different variations of mathematical patterns. There have even been some computer programs that allow you to input some melodies by a certain songwriter you like and then the computer will create some melodies in the style of that songwriter. These programs are not yet for sale, they have only been research projects so far But it won't be too long before these programs are for sale and you can bet that the major labels will want to ensure that the records by their artists sound enough like their previous hits, and the labels will use this sort of program to do so.


Matador is beautiful,a symphony of style
Excitement is ecstatic, passion places bets
Gracefully he bows to ovations that he gets
But the hands that are applauding are slippery with sweat
And saliva is falling from their smiles

Phil Ochs- Crucifixion

Songwriting
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443
Thanks Man in Two,

I think we are talking about the same thing and there is nothing to be sorry for.

You are talking about how it is laid out or "made" essentially and though I am glad you shared the math, I already knew it.

I was talking more about the applications because I have heard many people using the term "follow" and I simply did not not what they meant by that.

But both you and Mario have each given me invaluable insights in two different ways, and I appreciate that.

Thank you very much.

Songwriting
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,080
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,080
Originally Posted By: ManInTwoSocks
Now, if you are only using 3 chords that are in a circle of fifths progression, let's say G to C to F, then that does not really qualify as a circle of fifths progression. You really need to use at least 4 chords, such as G to C to F to A#, to qualify as an official circle of fifths progression, although that is not a hard and fast rule.

Any functional V->I progression counts as a "circle of fifths progression", even if it's only two chords.

Since your example progression it's long enough to establish C as the tonal center, the best explanation is a circle of fifths progression.

If you extended the progression long enough to establish C as the tonic, the G C would still be a circle of fifths progression.

Personally, I've always explained the circle of fifths to my students in terms of the harmonic series, since it gives a good explanation of functional consonance and dissonance. It's also worth noting that in that context, the "circle of fifths" doesn't actually return to the starting note, since there's a gap known as the Pyhagorean comma, which then leads to useful discussion about tempered tuning.

Quote:
The importance of the circle of fifths progression is that it can make your music sound more interesting. The reason it is making your music sound more interesting is because you are frequently modulating to a different key.

Plenty of circle of fifths progressions don't make use of modulation, and plenty of modulations don't make use of tonicization. Most do, because the V->I progression is perhaps the strongest progression in Western music, so it's often used to clarify to the listener that there's been modulation... But there's no requirement that the V->I movement be involved. For example:

D | Dm | Em | Fmaj7 | G | A | Bm | C#dim | D

Here, I've temporarily modulated from D major to D Dorian (or perhaps C Ionian, but because I wrote it I'll claim it's Dorian), moved in a stepwise progression, and then modulated out back to D major again, with nary a V->I motion in sight.

Quote:
Of course, if you are interested in writing top 40 style songs, or songs for film, tv, or ads, you should never use the circle of fifths, because, in those styles of music, they are just looking for musically boring songs that sound similar to songs the listeners have heard before.

Because V->I progressions never appear in popular music, with the exception of just about every pop song ever written. And temporary modulations never happen in popular music, except all the time.

Quote:
To sum up, the circle of fifths is merely a chord progression in which every chord is 5 semitones higher than the previous chord and it can be used anywhere in a song, verse, chorus or bridge, and it will make your song sound more interesting and more musically sophisticated.

Again, you appear to be talking about temporary modulation using a tonic pivot chord, not the circle of fifths.


-- David Cuny

My virtual singer development blog
Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
dcuny #462921 03/19/18 05:16 AM
Songwriting
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443

Wow Dave. The forum can get harsh when people get all technical and stuff, huh?

Hey I have a question:

If you don't know your butt from your elbow, and you have absolutely no idea what you are doing or talking about, but you write a tune and people say:

"Dude, that song was frickin' amazing, where did you come up with that chord progression????"

Are you using the Circle of Fifths then?

Even if you have no idea what that means and can't read a note?

Did Paul McCartney know the Circle of Fifths or did he just jam his butt off????

These are questions that have plagued me for years and I was wondering if you had any insights, sir.

Songwriting
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,196
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 24,196
Originally Posted By: David Snyder

Wow Dave. The forum can get harsh when people get all technical and stuff, huh?


David, I don't think that it is harsh. Actually we are all saying the same thing just in different ways. Remember the line in my first message, "BUT in music ALL rules can be broken".

Originally Posted By: David Snyder


Hey I have a question:

If you don't know your butt from your elbow, and you have absolutely no idea what you are doing or talking about, but you write a tune and people say:

"Dude, that song was frickin' amazing, where did you come up with that chord progression????"

Are you using the Circle of Fifths then?

Even if you have no idea what that means and can't read a note?

Did Paul McCartney know the Circle of Fifths or did he just jam his butt off????

These are questions that have plagued me for years and I was wondering if you had any insights, sir.


As Dave mentioned many songs change keys and/or modes withing the original key signature. This is important as the circle of fifths also changes along with them.

But you do not need to know theory or even read music to be a musician. It has been said that guitarist Wes Montgomery couldn't read music and didn't know theory. If this is true he did have one hell of an ear for music. A lot of the old blues guitarists couldn't read either and they put out some great music. The Beatles could not read music! Did that stop them from writing some of the best songs ever?

You play what your head, heart and ears tell you to play. Remember the same notes were under Beethoven's fingers that were under Monk's fingers.

I tell my students to learn theory but do not let it get into the way of your playing. Use it for practicing and for determining what you just played. The same goes for the circle of fifths/fourths. It is a tool to get back to the I chord but it is not the only way to get there. YMMV.


My boss calls me "the computer".
Nothing to do with intelligence. I go to sleep if left unattended for 15 minutes.

64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
Songwriting
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,080
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 8,080
Originally Posted By: David Snyder
These are questions that have plagued me for years and I was wondering if you had any insights, sir.

Hahahaha. I'll pretend you aren't trolling me. laugh

You're classically trained, so you know music theory is a set of generally accepted practices that you can use when you're trying to figure out why something doesn't work, usually only codifed after a given style is extinct. In plenty of cases - fugues come to mind - the theory doesn't even follow the "rules" that the composer allegedly used.

There's only one real rule of music: If it sounds good, it is good.

If you can be like Sir Paul and "just hear it", more power to you. That's the way you should be writing music.

Quote:
"Dude, that song was frickin' amazing, where did you come up with that chord progression????"

Yeah, you typically won't find that in music theory, will you?

While the Beatles made use of things like deceptive cadences, I can guarantee you that "What this song needs is a deceptive cadence" was said by none of the Beatles, ever. wink

More likely, they were fooling around with chords - or listened to someone else - and said "Dude, that progression is frickin' amazing, let's use it."


-- David Cuny

My virtual singer development blog
Vocal control, you say. Never heard of it. Is that some kind of ProTools thing?

BiaB 2025 | Windows 11 | Reaper | Way too many VSTis.
Songwriting
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 12
Newbie
Offline
Newbie
Joined: Feb 2018
Posts: 12
Originally Posted By: David Snyder

Wow Dave. The forum can get harsh when people get all technical and stuff, huh?

Hey I have a question:

If you don't know your butt from your elbow, and you have absolutely no idea what you are doing or talking about, but you write a tune and people say:

"Dude, that song was frickin' amazing, where did you come up with that chord progression????"

Are you using the Circle of Fifths then?

Even if you have no idea what that means and can't read a note?

Did Paul McCartney know the Circle of Fifths or did he just jam his butt off????

These are questions that have plagued me for years and I was wondering if you had any insights, sir.




David, Trump doen't know his butt from his elbow and nobody
has any idea what he is doing or talking about but he writes a
tweet anyway and people say to him "Dude Donald, that was
frickin' amazingly ridiculous, where did you come up with that
progressive descent into insanity?" He did all this without
studying anything about political theory.

That is due to his drinking too many... fifths smile

But seriously, none of the Beatles knew anything about music theory
and they could not read music at all. I have read numerous interviews with
many songwriters and i can't recall a single one who actually had
studied music theory at all. That chord progression at the beginning
of Paul's Yesterday actually came to him in a dream, and no pop song
had ever used that chord progression before.

Even Frank Zappa, who wrote a number of albums of orchestral
works, only had 6 months of formal music training. He just had an incredibly
good ear and taught himself how to write music so that orchestras
could perform his music.

By the way, not only is it not necessary to know any music theory to write
songs, you do not even have to know how to play a musical
instrument! I once saw an ad in the paper from some guy who had
written around 80 songs, who did not play any musical instrument,
he had written all the lyrics down on paper and had kept all the melodies
in his head. He wanted someone who could play guitar to try to
figure out the chords he heard in his head so he could then put
them on a tape recorder.

So i met with him a few times and i would play chords for the melodies
he sung until i finally found the progressions he heard in his head,
and then he would sing while i played guitar and he taped the result.
I found that to be a very interesting experience and it was nice to
be able to physicalize what was in his head. Although, i do have to
admit that his melodies were not very interesting and alot of his
melodies sounded similar to other of his melodies.

By the way, David, if these questions have caused you to have the
plague, as you say, then you will have to be quarantined to posting
in this forum only by the CDC (Chord Digressions Control) smile


Matador is beautiful,a symphony of style
Excitement is ecstatic, passion places bets
Gracefully he bows to ovations that he gets
But the hands that are applauding are slippery with sweat
And saliva is falling from their smiles

Phil Ochs- Crucifixion

Songwriting
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,443


Oh, no no no Two Socks, we are good.

You have just given me my new song man.

Be back in 18 hours.

smile

Hold on. I am about to make History here.

Thanks everybody. You'll see.

Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Moderated by  Andrew - PG Music, PeterGannon 

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!

Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!

We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!

Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.

Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.

There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!

Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.

If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!

Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!

We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!

There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.

When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.

Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.

Happy New Year!

Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.

Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!

Season's Greetings!

Wishing everyone a happy, healthy holiday season—thanks for being part of our community!

The office will be closed for Christmas Day, but we will be back on Boxing Day (Dec 26th) at 6:00am PST.

Team PG

Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: The Newly Designed Piano Roll Window

In this video, we explore the updated Piano Roll, complete with a modernized look and exciting new features. You’ll see new filtering options that make it easy to focus on specific note groups, smoother and more intuitive note entry and editing, and enhanced options for zooming, looping, and more.

Watch the video.

You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!

Band-in-a-Box 2026 Video: AI Stems & Notes - split polyphonic audio into instruments and transcribe

This video demonstrates how to use the new AI-Notes feature together with the AI-Stems splitter, allowing you to select an audio file and have it separated into individual stems while transcribing each one to its own MIDI track. AI-Notes converts polyphonic audio—either full mixes or individual instruments—into MIDI that you can view in notation or play back instantly.

Watch the video.

You can see all the 2026 videos on our forum!

Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®

With your version 2026 for Windows Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!

These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!

This Free Bonus PAK includes:

  • The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK: -For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles. -For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles. -For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
  • MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
  • MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
  • Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
  • Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
  • Playable RealTracks Set 5
  • RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
  • SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
  • Android Band-in-a-Box® App (included)

Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:


  • 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
  • FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
  • MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
  • MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
  • Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
  • Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
  • RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
  • SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)

Learn more about the Bonus PAKs for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics85,579
Posts793,567
Members39,918
Most Online25,754
Jan 24th, 2025
Newest Members
FREDERRY, Smithin, Gjsmal, JacksGuitar, Gibson J45 Banner
39,917 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 164
DC Ron 104
Noel96 86
jpettit 86
rsdean 70
dcuny 64
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5