Thank you for your insight and comments. They are worthy of consideration.

The point I am alluding to is that Band In A Box cannot be expected to be Band In a Box and also deliver all features that other not-so-similar products 'individually' deliver.

My example is this: Why should it be challenged because it doesn't also do what 'xyz' or 'abc' other programs can already do?

What it does is great, exceptional in fact, no question. If it could do more that would be a bonus, again no question.

I, for one would like it to do some things better. But we are wrong to expect it to do everything that some other separate products can do, and to criticise it if it cannot. That's all.

It's like picking the best features of every luxury car and condemning another model because it doesn't include every one of those features.

We cannot unfairly judge the product just because it doesn't do everything we would individually like it to deliver.

Anyone is free to develop and introduce their own product if another product doesn't cut it for them.

I hope this clarifies the intention of my post.

BIAB & RB2025 Win.(Audiophile), Sonar Platinum, Cakewalk by Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M Monitors, Pioneer Active Monitors, AKG K271 Studio H'phones