|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386 |
Hi fellows. Every day I try to find some time to read some posts on this forum. Some stuff is great and very informative. What I can not find is this... There is a showcase of songs, here is a songwriting thread. Is there one which deals with critique of specific songs/tunes?? Let me explain. I am not a professional musician in any way, music is strictly a hobby and joy for me. But I do want to get better at it. Some musicians are very protective of their stuff and take suggestions or opinions that might not seem positive to them very painfully. To me, and I am sure to quite a few people, healthy critique might be very beneficial. For example, it could work like a "showcase" thread but only for suggestions/critique. Sort of song making 101 (or 501). Meaning, post would have to contain song! No "songless" posts! For those who feel that there might be something they can take from suggestions, not just "showcasing" music. For example, I listen to the track of a fellow member and I just feel that bass would feel better if it was quieter ... So I say it . Or vocals are too dry, say it....Basically specific thread for those who want a critical, but respectful ear. Not specifically professional  just "how it feels". P.S. Showcase is ok, but comments are 99% sweet and positive, not much critique there. Let me know what you think about it. Thanks, Mike.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,987
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,987 |
There is no reason that you can't do what you are describing - in the Showcase.
Simply start your post by stating that you want critiques. You can even say something to the affect of "hard critiques" - with whatever aspect you are wanting feedback on. The subject line could have some type notice, too... "Critiques Wanted: My New Song"... I'm sure you would get some feedback from all sides...
And... you can take those comments/suggestions with a grain of salt if you choose. I have had critiques of song lyric and structure (in the Showcase) that were some of the most ridiculous song suggestions I've ever heard...
And, you can let folks know - in the Showcase - that you think there is some aspect of a production that could use "a tweak" - if done in a respectable, polite manner. (I remixed a song recently based on comments about an odd sounding harmony).
(I think we have too many separate sections on this forum as it is... just a personal observation, of course)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,103
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,103 |
Yes, I agree with Floyd. I will often end a post with "all comments welcome", or if I'm looking for feedback on particular aspect I will ask for it specifically.
And I have no problem in providing feedback to others if I hear something in their mix that I think could use improvements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386 |
Hmmm... FJ...Can not agree with you. 99% of comments are not suggestive in any way at "showcase", but praising.
Which works as designed... but I believe even a name "SHOWCASE" suggests a final product.
What I propose is a thread that deals with... not fully baked things. For people with open mind about their tunes, mostly for people who want critical opinion, not "showcasing".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,987
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,987 |
Just because people are generally nice (in the Showcase) does not mean that you cannot get valid critiques if you made it a point to ask.
Why not try it and see what happens?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386 |
FJ, simple...
I could not find anything similar, and that might be because people are shy to ask or do not want to ask, because as I mentioned "Showcase" in my mind as probably in other people minds suggests a finished product.
From dictionary: showcase: exhibit; display. "the albums showcase his production skills"
What I am talking about is not "showing" skills, but actually asking for improvement suggestions.
In similar manner there are art shows and art workshops. Which are very different in their nature. In one, people display their art in other people learn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 5,139 |
You are posting in the correct forum.
"Discussions, Tips-n-Tricks, Resources and Questions about Songwriting"
Regards,
Bob
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,987
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,987 |
I have given you a valid suggestion.
Other people HAVE posted "unfinished" work in the Showcase and asked for valid critiques. And they get it. Granted, most often the songs in the Showcase are (considered by their creator) "finished" and most people do want folks to "appreciate" their work.
BUT...that does not mean you cannot get valid critiques IF YOU ASK FOR IT.
You seem unwilling to do so and simply want to argue a point of your own making.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386 |
FJ, Ok. Let me try it your way. There is a tune I finished this morning. I will try to post it now to "showcase" to see if you are correct about asking for suggestions.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,335
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,335 |
Let me know what you think about it. Thanks, Mike. Well.... IMO.... This particular subject has come up in the past. The Showcase is generally an 'encouragement' and it's all good sort forum and to 'showcase' what BIAB is capable of.....which is fine. As Floyd states....post your song in the "Songwriting" forum and just be very specific about the aspects of the song you want a critique on.Many years ago I would politely offer "suggestions" based on a poster's request. I rarely do anymore for a few reasons. Candidly submitted comments can easily be taken personally by those who have thin skin vs. having the skin of a snow tire. I'm critical about what I like, the genre that is actually appealing to me or what I perceive to be vapid, cookie cutter creations. Unless a song actually moves me with well chosen, non cliche subject matter and well recorded I stay out of the commentaries. Why would I think my candid assessment of their creation would be well received anyway especially if they don't like my material.  If I hear a song that has musical merit/original creativity to me....I might just comment. But, about a year or so ago I posted a request for only 'mix' comments only on a few of my BIAB songs. I'd never post a song asking 'what do you think of my (masterpiece:)) creation'. I did not ask for comments about liking my song/material because they may think I suck at song writing....but, they kindly listened and I appreciated ALL the "mix" responses/suggestions. If people post their material on the public forums they should not get offended by anyone's comments knowing there will always be someone who is honest about their critique but the poster will end up being offended in some fashion. I'll visit your 'critique my new song' thread and see how it evolves. That's my take on it....back to topic.
Last edited by chulaivet1966; 10/20/18 05:52 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386 |
chulaivet1966,
Love your "snow tire skin" comment. This is a perfect song theme/title!!!
Well put!
My problem is that hearing "own" stuff is always tricky, I always appreciate and take honest side opinions seriously. Even from friends that have no clue about music making.
Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,335
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,335 |
chulaivet1966, Love your "snow tire epidermis?" comment. This is a perfect song theme/title!!! My problem is that hearing me "own" stuff is always tricky, I always appreciate and take honest side opinions seriously. Even from friends that have no clue about music making. Being specific in one's request is the key. I've always liked to write. It takes me a while flesh out the story but I'm quite comfortable with my subject choices and lyric writing (no, doesn't mean anyone else thinks it has any merit) so I wouldn't ask for opinions on those aspects. I'm concerned more with how my mix translates to other monitor systems. I use KRK Rockit 8's and any generous listener may be using Tannoy's or JBL's. That's the most important aspect to me to get a feel for. Back to topic.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386 |
chulaivet1966, I agree with most of the things you said. Especially about specific questions. The thing that troubles me the most is mixing. Sadly, I am a bit sloppy at that. I am getting a bit better, after I discovered that for mixing it is better (in my view) to use open or semi-open back headphones. I had tough time with settling on monitor speakers. I considered KRK Rockit, but then got Roland DM-20 at great price and decided to keep them. The "professional" monitors are out of my budget. I used cheaper Edirol's in the past, so I knew what to expect. Like you, I am concerned how mix translates to other systems. As Floyd Jane suggested, I posted my recent tune to "showcase" section and within few hours the replies I got shared a view that mix has issues which I believe are in part of the "how mix translates" dilemma Thank you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
Here's a single mixing tip I got recently about how it sounds on different set-ups. Mix in mono. Certainly set your tracks to luscious stereo, but do your main mix (levels, EQ, compression, sweetening) in mono. Unless one is wearing good phones, or good-earbuds AND sitting still, mono (more or less) is how they will hear your song. Mixing in mono will get you more quickly to good results across all systems. Then open it up and feel the glory.
A bonus tip: use a professionally mixed reference track (your basic genre, instrumentation, overall "feel". Set it on an aux bus and reference it frequently to see if your mix is close. I've chosen Steely Dan recordings as mine. They were less sloppy and muddy than I tend to be, and I like the way they sound. Pick something you like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,335
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 1,335 |
The thing that troubles me the most is mixing. Sadly, I am a bit sloppy at that. I am getting a bit better, after I discovered that for mixing it is better (in my view) to use open or semi-open back headphones. First....I never mix on head phones. Second....anyone can get a good (acceptable on most systems without being anal) mix on their monitors whether their cheapies or not. The challenge is that over time one must get to know their monitors. Knowing what frequencies/instruments that may always need an EQ massage before the mix process. That takes time and some aural focus when you're starting to mix and trying to employ mix suggestions from others. But...that's just me....to each their own.
Last edited by chulaivet1966; 10/20/18 12:20 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,640
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,640 |
MY SONGS...Audiophile BIAB 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,520
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 8,520 |
Rusty/Mike,
There are a lot of people on the forum who are professional-level mixers, producers and songwriters. That is a resource to be valued and honored and treated with respect.
The showcase, I think, is generally a place where people like to post songs that they are proud of and get a little encouragement—in a world that is filled with a lot of discouragement.
But, if you want experts on the forum to critique a certain part of your mix, I suggest you be specific, as others have cited, because it takes time to listen to a drum mix, for example, and make meaningful suggestions.
So my advice would be, let the showcase continue to be a place of encouragement for those who are working so hard and want to celebrate with their friends and show off what they have done.
That seems to be the general spirit and I applaud it. It’s how you grow. 99% encouragement and 1% helpful suggestion is a good mix I have found over the years. UNLESS people specifically ask for something else.
If YOU on the other hand want hard criticism, ask for it, but, again, be specific on what you think you want to improve.
As a closing FYI, most people give praise remarks because everybody is busy and trying to cover all their bases returning favors for people who have kindly listened to their songs and given encouragement in return. It has nothing to do with being disingenuous.
Mixing is really, really, really, really hard. It takes years just to make the smallest improvements.
There is a deep learning curve with today's technology, so we should all be thankful there is a place like this where people can learn in a respectful environment.
Disrespect, as you know, kills everything.
So, dive in and learn. I have made some great friends on this forum, and have wonderful mentors here. It is a marvelous place if you treat people well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Mar 2018
Posts: 7,386 |
chulaivet1966, I must disagree with you about headphones mixing for two reasons. 1) this has been a loong debate...I am on Noel side (Noel, I read your post on mixing technique, thank you.)to use/alternate between headphones/speakers. 2) is more serious .. I do not have much choice...my son goes to bed at 8:30  So for most of mixing, headphones are my best friends. The EQ massage...on my mixes I need a combination of skilled chiropractor and a strong handed Thai massage therapist to gain flexibility. David, we have somewhat different goals. I am not a musician, just a hobbyist. My goal is not to "produce" or to gain "popularity" but just improve my flow of doing things as well as the output. I am always trying to be my best with people who are respectful to me. Me thinks you did not grasp the point I was trying to make, which I still believe is valid. To sum it up semi-haiku style: Would be nice to have a workshop-thread based on actual audio material as reference for those who seek specific or general advise on particular tune or such. Thank you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
If I've made a "constructive criticism", then I feel obligated to offer a constructive fix. Problem is, I've got problems of my own with mixing. I know a few "fixes", but they can be arrived at in various ways. Nobody needs them all. Which one (or a couple) work for you depends on your genre (and it's expectations), your own taste and preference, and the taste and preference of the one giving counsel--as well as your skills and "equipment", both hard and soft. All I can do is tell you what I heard and in the broadest terms possible what might work better.
I've been clicking "play" on sites like this for most of more than 20 years. Only once in thousands of listens have I wanted what I heard to suck. What I offer in advice (take it or leave it) is determined by what I hear. I know within a few bars "where" the person I'm listening to is in terms of talent and sound. I try to respond accordingly (and sometimes fail).
I'm new here and just beginning to learn who the "players" are. Still, I don't know them well enough to know their own goals with music. I'm not even sure about my own. So I don't know if it is someone who wants to improve over time, or someone who wants to work this particular mix to the highest level possible, or even if it's someone who doesn't care that much about the mix if what they've done gets across what they want to "showcase". I'm OK either way, for their sake. I don't have time, however, to run comparison listens for subjective takes on mixing decisions.
There are only a few mixing "squicks" for me. 1. Constant or momentary over-compression. 2. Heavily muddied EQ balancing. 3. Levels of vocals (if any)--either too loud or too soft. 4. Overall master levels (too loud or too soft). That's pretty much it.
If someone has done a decent job with those, then I'm happy enough. If they have done a good job with all or most of these with the occasional "problem", then I figure they know at least as much as I do about what they are doing and don't require anything more than a passing comment. If someone demonstrates little or no competence (or care) on any or all those things, then I'm not the one to teach them in a song review. I'm just a guy on the internet.
Clearly there are those among us who are artful and masterful at mixing. Seems to me, however, on this forum that they are also making their own music...in addition to living their own lives. You mentioned time-restraints.
Maybe in addition to seeking comment and or advise on a mix, you might also mention what your own goals are with the song. People will either play along or they won't. Who can blame them?
Last edited by Tangmo; 10/20/18 09:17 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Songwriting
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
Bonus mixing tip: If you hear that two instruments are battling over a frequency range, if is better to cut than to boost.
On the other hand, there is another method if it is, say, two guitars that by nature are going to share frequencies. A parametric EQ is, probably, the best tool to use for this.
Pair the instruments. Determine which is the dominant. Find the best center frequency that delivers the "punch" you are looking for, whether is is high, mid, or mid-low. When you've found that frequency, boost it 2 or 3 db. Doing this will "roll-up" neighboring frequencies depending on how wide you've set your range. Then with the same settings, lower the gain on the other instrument the same--2 or 3 db. It may sound thinner solo, but combined it is the aural equivalent of lead vocals and harmonies. The goal is to stop the two similar instruments from sharing too much of the same frequencies, not to eliminate the frequencies.
Again, do this in mono first. When you can clearly make out what each of the two is doing, then you are "there". That's the fastest way to get there with EQ--mix in mono.
The above advice is in addition to, not a replacement for, what's been shared by others.
An observation and question: Even though I'm just getting started, so far I haven't seemed to have to do much EQ work with real-tracks--at least from the same style. Is that anybody else's experience?
Last edited by Tangmo; 10/21/18 06:06 AM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last Chance! The Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® Special Ends Today (May 31, 2026) at 11:59pm PDT!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PDT today!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the amazing new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. View the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to transcribe an entire track or transcribe specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Mac® to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Special Offers Extended Until May 31st!
Good news- we've extended our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® special offers until May 31, 2026!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 is packed with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can transcribe an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PDT on May 31st, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Check out the Band-in-a-Box® for Mac packages page to find the best package for you.
Holiday Weekend Hours
It's Victoria Day Long Weekend in Canada. Our Customer Service hours are:
Saturday, May 16: Closed
Sunday, May 17: Closed
Monday, May 18: 8:00am - 4:00pm
Regular hours resume Tuesday, May 19th!
Today's the Last Day of the Band-in-a-Box 2026® for Mac Special!
Order before 11:59pm PDT today (May 15, 2026) to save up to 50% off your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrade and receive a FREE Bonus PAK loaded with great new Add-ons to use with this new version!
Don't wait - order today!
Check out all the new features in the redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!
Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.
Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.
If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!
202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!
With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!
Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.
Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.
Check out all the 202 new RealTracks (in sets 468-488)!
And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.
The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
- The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
- MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
- Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
- Playable RealTracks Set 5
- RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
- SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
- iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
- 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
- FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
- MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
- MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
- Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
- Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
- RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
- SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
Learn more about the Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,475
Posts805,465
Members40,126
| |
Most Online64,515 Apr 8th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|