|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086 |
What reference tracks do you recommend for the genres you like to produce in and do you use them for the "overall" sound/balance or to reference a specific part of the production?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,554
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,554 |
Under the Table and Dreaming
Dark Side of the Moon
I don't use 'tracks' but rather the CD/Album as a whole.
might just be me on this though (unless I'm trying to match a specific target song given by client)
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,883
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Aug 2012
Posts: 12,883 |
It depends entirely on the song being produced (for me, anyway). I try to think of a song similar in style and tempo to what I am working on.
Usually it would be to "match"/balance the overall sound. But there are times when it's just about a particular part...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,513
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,513 |
I think this is totally dependent on the genre you are using. My answers for my preferred music genre are not going to be of any use to you. But you are wise to ask for good samples in your genre once you identify it for us. You are also wise to use this technique when mixing and mastering.
Now, it's also helpful to specify the historical period you want to use as your reference. Was it during the heyday of Autotune? And especially, was it during the recently somewhat-completed loudness wars?
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Presonus Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 7,913 |
What genre? A decent place to start is to look through Bob Katz's loudness and dynamics honor roll in your genre of interest. https://www.digido.com/honor-roll/While his list is focused on mastering, it's also a great reference for listening to incredible mixes and arrangement (which is where the whole process actually needs to be realized - can't all be made up in the mastering). -Scott
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086
Veteran
|
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5,086 |
This is the article that inspired the questions. https://sonicscoop.com/2017/04/24/reference-tracks-next-generation/Personally at the moment I'm playing with two songs on my new monitors when I'm not listening to other music I'm working on remixing a country song and mixing my first instrumental - a jazz influenced easy listening thing which I quite like. I haven't found the "right" reference track for either yet. But I'm finding that listening in general makes me more aware overall. Edit - I was gonna edit to say more but I hit the wrong key and computer started reading every word on the screen out loud over and over...I didn't even know it could do that...had to exit to make it stop. Be back later on. Thanks to everyone who's posted. 
Last edited by Sundance; 10/28/18 05:29 PM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,809
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,809 |
This is so subjective.
First I would recommend something in the same genre as a good overall, catch all kind of reference when mixing.
Going deeper....
Any of the TRIO CDs ( Dolly Parton, Linda Ronstadt, EmmyLou Harris) are great references for trying to get a superb acoustic instrument track.
Another benchmark standard for quality in recording.... Steely Dan's masterful album, Aja. The epitome of writing, recording, production. nuff said.
These are just two of many. Each engineer and FOH will have their own list of favorites for reference and system setting.
Each of the specifically mentioned projects are superbly recorded and produced. It's easy to hear the individual parts as each instrument comes in and goes out. Pay really close attention to the details of the mix. How EQ is applied on things, reverb, panning, etc.
One thing I notice on beginners music mixes is that it's generally a jumble of all the instruments. In other words, everything packed into one space where you have a really hard time picking out what individual instruments are doing. When you listen to the referenced mixes, this is not the case. You can hear everything in the mix with space between the instruments, yet it is a full bodied mix. You can hear the nuances of the dobro, the bass, the snare, and the vocals set nicely on/in the mix.
It's good to use reference tracks but don't beat yourself up if you don't get it exact, or in some cases, even close. You are in your small home studio, whereas the producer and engineer are in a fully equipped studio and have a ton more experience. Our goal is to listen, learn, and apply those lessons to improve.
My measuring stick is to occasionally go back and listen to the music I was mixing 10 years ago..... 5 years ago.......3 years ago..... 1 year ago. Do I hear a definite improvement in the sonic quality over that time? If so, I'm progressing on the path. If on the other hand, my new stuff sounds like the 10 year old stuff, maybe it's time to reevaluate how I'm doing things because everyone should be getting better at this thing called music and mixing, with time.
This might seem obvious, but you'd be surprised..... Many folks start to care about the mix when they have the tracks recorded and then start the "mixing" process of adding EQ, verb, compression. However, that is waaaaaaay too late. You must pay attention to the recording of the individual tracks. For us, the users of BB & Real Tracks, fortunately, most of this is a given, since we have really good track quality with the real tracks. The problem comes in when we add anything live. Anything that's recorded with a mic. This includes but isn't limited to the guitar and vocals. Those tracks are just as important to get a great quality on as the RTs. Too often the live tracks are deficient and lacking.
Once recorded, you can't often fix a poorly recorded guitar or vocal track in the mix by adding reverb and EQ. Spend the time instead to get a nice full dB level, clean, and articulate track. If you listen to the track and have to add FX to it to make it sound good..... delete it and record it again. As an example, Paul McCartney once spent over 2 days recording a doubled vocal track for one of the Beatles songs. We can spend a few hours or so to get it right. This is one of the biggest problems I see and hear in people's mixes. The old "I can fix it in the mix" syndrome is lazy and wrong. No.... fix it in the track.... it's easier and will sound better. Delete it and record it again.
And I will say, I'm as guilty as anyone for saying to myself, "that's good enough. I can hide those problems in the mix". Sometimes I can and other times I can't and end up going back to record it again.
Hope this helps and adds to the conversation.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 464
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 464 |
I agree that you have to listen to something in the genre. I also think you have to consider how many years ago something was recorded. For example, I like the production style on the old Al Green records. It was subtle and soulful, not in your face at all. But things are different now, so that may influence you.
I am working on a blues/soul project now. I am listening to Sam and Dave and some of the Chess recordings.
I also use certain CD's to see how my recording quality compares to something I know is good. For that, I listen to Aja and Gaucho by Steely Dan, The Seeds of Love by Tears for Fears. Of course, I never hit those marks but it gives me something to work toward.
2b
i5-3210 laptop. Win 10 Home. 2.5ghz, 64 bit. 6gb RAM. Focusrite Scarlet 2i2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,554
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: May 2000
Posts: 22,554 |
2bSolo
Yeah, those Steely Dan references are nice examples.
Something about Aja set a standard for the time.
Two Against Nature wasn't too shabby either. At least for a recording reference ..
I took the OP to mean basic 'go-to' recordings used to, well, reference as a comparison for recording quality vs what I have.
Last edited by rharv; 10/29/18 01:34 PM.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome
Make your sound your own!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381
Expert
|
|
Expert
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 1,381 |
I thought I'd be alone in referencing Steely Dan. For me, now, at my level, it serves 2 functions.
1. As something to work toward. Steely Dan sounds like "winter" to me. My typical mixes have tended to sound like a humid summer, with 100% chance of afternoon Thunderstorms. I can't emulate Steely Dan, but I can work towards that.
2. As a reality check. I can listen to a mix and think I've got it working, then add a mastering preset and BAM--BRIGHTER, FULLER, and having me convinced I'm a genius. Then I listen to the reference track, silently weep, and give it another go.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,809
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Apr 2009
Posts: 10,809 |
I thought I'd be alone in referencing Steely Dan. For me, now, at my level, it serves 2 functions.
1. As something to work toward. Steely Dan sounds like "winter" to me. My typical mixes have tended to sound like a humid summer, with 100% chance of afternoon Thunderstorms. I can't emulate Steely Dan, but I can work towards that.
2. As a reality check. I can listen to a mix and think I've got it working, then add a mastering preset and BAM--BRIGHTER, FULLER, and having me convinced I'm a genius. Then I listen to the reference track, silently weep, and give it another go. Ozone will do that to you.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.comAdd nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both. The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 464
Journeyman
|
|
Journeyman
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 464 |
They don't call their engineer The Immortal for nothing. Those records would not have been the same without him and Gary Katz.
You listen to Aja and everything has a sonic space. Parts don't attack you, they just wait for you to discover them. It takes multiple listenings to begin to get what they are doing. So many musicians and engineers consider this a standard. I have to wonder who is cranking out some of the crap out there.
One other album I forgot is Brothers in Arms by Dire Straits. It features several styles and makes all them sound excellent.
2b
i5-3210 laptop. Win 10 Home. 2.5ghz, 64 bit. 6gb RAM. Focusrite Scarlet 2i2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,031
Veteran
|
|
Veteran
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 6,031 |
I use the same approach as Floyd, it depends entirely on the song I'm working on.
I have quite a few CD's loaded on my music computer, I just pick a track that is close to the sound I'm aiming for and use that as a reference.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recording, Mixing, Performance and Production
|
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 3
Newbie
|
|
Newbie
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 3 |
You can Use Floyd music balance between voice and instruments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,085
Posts799,949
Members40,030
| |
Most Online44,367
Mar 4th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean