Hi Compadres. Stupid Q: Soloist track, selected a direct input pedalsteel. I cannot find where to set the audio level, as it's really low in the mix. I guess it's to do with some hidden track setting somewhere, as other RTs also are low in level. Exporting via AUDIO export and normalizing gives a 'normal' healthy level. F
Some demo songs have track volume levels set in the style. Then, if another Realtrack is used to replace one of the tracks that has been volume adjusted, that new Realtrack is affected by the volume adjustment.
That sounds like it could be what has happened here. Have a look at the below thread and see if that helps. Although the thread is applied to the "Strings" track, just replace "Strings" with the track that your soloist is on.
Did you assign Amplitube, or some other amp simulator plugin to that track? The "Direct Input" RealTracks are quieter than the regular versions, as they're recorded dry, and are intended to be boosted by Amplitube.
If you're not assigning Amplitube to that track, I wouldn't recommend using the Direct Input version of that pedal steel. The regular version is much louder.
Hello Kent. Nope, no Amplitude, no other plugins, and i don't like prerecorded FX very much; usually they are in the way and throw too much mud in a mix. I will shop for other versions then, but the only Paul Franklin RTs ara all Direct input ones ... F
PS i loaded one of the RT Direct Input version (1669) WAVs i needed in Wavelab, directly from its RT Direct Input folder. The level is REDICULOUSLY LOW, some - 18dB. Please notify the responsible programmers: IMO this is really un-acceptable, and needs to be re edited/fixed from the original recordings. I would eagerly await a serious RT AP update regarding these. I cannot do it myself, as the noise level would be increasing too much. These versions are useless ... See picture 1.
I don't like Amplitube very much and only like to use the Pedal Steel recordings barebone, but for now i will use the 'normal version' instead. thnx, F
PS i wonder how many other Direct Input RTs are treated the same way and thus more or less 'malfunctioning' as such? FOR COMPARISON: Picture 2 is from one normal non Direct Input and FX-ed (? as it sounds quite clean ?) version for comparison; looks completely healthy ...
It sounds like you're using a DI track in a manner that is not it's intended use. Any instrument that is deliberately recorded dry is supposed to be used with effects added later in post production. An effects unit will drastically boost the gain whether it's a software emulation like Amplitube or you run the audio out to a hardware unit. If a DI track was recorded at normal volume there would be no headroom left for the effects. I would just insert the PG 5 band EQ and boost that track that way if you like the sound dry.
I guess you might be right, and Kent about NOT using the DI versions in my case. but i wonder now if the direct input versions are of any use to us then .... If i want to use a 16bit WAV for later FX-ing, i would try to stick closer to -12dB instead of the - 18dB used here. It's not 24 or 32 bit audio, thus far less headroom to play with.
If you don't plan on putting Amplitube or some other guitar amp plugin on the track, then I'd say the DI version won't be of any use to you. That's their only purpose, they allow you to use your own amp settings if you don't like the amp/effects used on the original RealTrack.
Umh, just figured this is about the 'Ways of the (BIAB) World' (a nice fiddle tune written by Rayna Gellert) in this case. To DI or not to DI good ole Shakespeare would say; it was just a Stupid Q, remember? ... F
If you did want to use the DI track to see what it sounded like, you could always run the PG Music DX effect "Gain Change" to boost the volume of the track. This could be done in BIAB.
No, you're still not getting it Frank. The "normal" RT's are recorded using mic's on amps plus some EQ and reverb. A DI track takes the audio cable directly from your guitar into the console and writes it to a stereo track. No amp, no EQ, no nothing. Hence the term "dry". If you're asking about the performance itself then yes it could be the same track. They would run the guitar cable to a splitter, one output goes to the amp and effects and gets recorded the the other output goes directly into the board with no effects of amps.
In my case I'm a keyboard player who focuses on a Hammond B3 and piano. The B3 console by itself does not sound anything like most recordings you hear with organ because the Leslie is literally half the sound of the organ. No Leslie it sounds flat and lifeless. Jon Lord is the one who pioneered the use of taking an audio tap out of the B3 preamp and running it to Marshall stacks to get his powerful and gritty organ sound. Therefor if I wanted to duplicate the Jon Lord sound with an organ RT I would request PGM record some B3 tracks in the exact same manner. Dry output directly from the organs preamp and that's it. No Leslie cabinet sim, no Leslie rotating effect. With no Marshall stack emulation it would be a pretty crappy organ sound believe me.
It's exactly the same thing with guitar DI tracks. Flat and lifeless until you apply some amp sims, EQ, phasers, whatever.
To expand this even more, in order to get a really good studio sound live on stage some very big name players will use DI boxes on stage to do the same thing. The DI goes to the soundman who applies all the effects there and feeds the sound back to the individual IEM's for each player. I've read interviews with bass players and guitarists who love that. They don't have to have their favorite bass amp and an effects rack on stage with them. The dry bass goes right to the console and all that gets applies there. All he has to do is plug in, that's it.
Right now i guess the Direct Input wav files are copies of the same 'normal' ones, only the levels are set some -18db lower. Am i right?
Therefor it would not make any sense to 'push' their low levels up, thereby increasing the noise floor too. -F
Look at it this way. Take a solid body guitar, play it through a couple of effects and an amp and record it with a mic in front of the amp. That is a "wet" RT. Now unplug the solid body guitar, that is no effects or amp, and record it with the same mic in front of it. It will be a lot quieter. That is a "dry" RT.
The idea behind this is that you take the "dry" RT and play it through your amp and effects. These can be software emulations or through hardware effects and amp.
I hope this helped.
Whenever I get something stuck in the back of my throat, I dislodge it by drinking a beer. It's called the Heineken Maneuver.
64 bit Win 10 Pro, the latest BiaB/RB, Roland Octa-Capture audio interface, a ton of software/hardware
... In my case I'm a keyboard player who focuses on a Hammond B3 and piano ... Bob
Bob: regarding B3; got any favorite VSTs? I liked the Native B4 in the past, used it once in a 'serious' situation. These days there are so many more available, some even free.
Kent & Bob: As for your extensive replies, thanks for clearing matters ... so i get that the DI versions don't use any after instrument electrickery; the DI version is just with sound coming out of a normal output (electric signal) of any amplification needing instrument without pre-amp and mixing FX like compression, gating, EQ, reverb and delays. The non DI RTs then use some amplification preamp grit and sweetening. Hopefully without reverb etc added to the WAVs.
Still in regards to the Pedal Steel sound of Paul Franklin i felt the DI version sounds slightly cleaner and maybe better suited for a mix with acoustic real instruments. Hence my grief with the DI version RTs & the low levels still persists. F
<<< Hence my grief with the DI version RTs & the low levels still persists. F >>>
The DI RT is useable with the low level. You have several options to bring the track to a useable level in its 'dry' state. You can export the track at its low level and open it in Audacity, RealBand or any DAW and gain stage the track which brings the initial level up and import the corrected track back into your BIAB project.
Other options you may want to try:
From within BIAB, you can convert the track to a performance track and apply the audio effects gain change, limiter or compressor or a combination of the effects to bring up the level. From the gain stage menu, you can choose to normalize the track.
Set the track to a level that is near the volumes of the other tracks and you don't have to make drastic changes to the mixer volume fader or that it is set too high and distorts.
The low level; it's in the USB PG drive 's saved wav itself. Increasing it also increases the noise floor. Why i started this post LoL. IMO the minimum level with a 16dbit wav is -12dB, what i learned 'officially' in the old days of audio for video (especially TV) mixing; the norm back then when digital audio first came around, with Sony PCM masters & later DAT recorders, all 16bit. I still have an expensive gastubed fast (analog) peak level meter somewhere because of that. A norm abandoned tthese days because every wants to be loudest, especially with commercials. F.
In audacity not only can you increase gain you can cut out noise it take practice but it works.
HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2025, Realband, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 9 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app.
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: VST3 Plugin Support
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® now includes support for VST3 plugins, alongside VST and AU. Use them with MIDI or audio tracks for even more creative possibilities in your music production.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Macs®: VST3 Plugin Support
Video: Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®: Using VST3 Plugins
With the release of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac, we’re rolling out a collection of brand-new videos on our YouTube channel. We’ll also keep this forum post updated so you can easily find all the latest videos in one convenient spot.
From overviews of new features and walkthroughs of the 202 new RealTracks, to highlights of XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAKs 18, the 2025 49-PAK, and in-depth tutorials — you’ll find everything you need to explore what’s new in Band-in-a-Box® 2025.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac is here, packed with major new features and an incredible collection of available new content! This includes 202 RealTracks (in Sets 449-467), plus 20 bonus Unreleased RealTracks in the 2025 49-PAK. There are new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 4, two new sets of “RealDrums Stems,” XPro Styles PAK 8, Xtra Styles PAK 19, and more!
Special Offers
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac with savings of up to 50% on most upgrade packages during our special—available until July 31, 2025! Visit our Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
2025 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK Add-ons
We've packed our Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK with some incredible Add-ons! The Free Bonus PAK is automatically included with most Band-in-a-Box® for Mac 2025 packages, but for even more Add-ons (including 20 Unreleased RealTracks!) upgrade to the 2025 49-PAK for only $49. You can see the full lists of items in each package, and listen to demos here.
If you have any questions, feel free to connect with us directly—we’re here to help!
Cari amici
È stata aggerate la versione in Italiano del programma più amato dagli appassionati di musica, il nostro Band-in-a-Box.
Questo è il link alla nuova versione 2025.
Di seguito i link per scaricare il pacchetti di lingua italiana aggiornati per Band-in-a-Box e RealBand, anche per chi avesse già comprato la nuova versione in inglese.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 pour Windows est disponible en Français.
Le téléchargement se fait à partir du site PG Music
Pour ceux qui auraient déjà acheté la version 2025 de Band-in-a-Box (et qui donc ont une version anglaise), il est possible de "franciser" cette version avec les patchs suivants:
Band-in-a-Box 2025 für Windows Deutsch ist verfügbar!
Die deutsche Version Band-in-a-Box® 2025 für Windows ist ab sofort verfügbar!
Alle die bereits die englische Version von Band-in-a-Box und RealBand 2024 installiert haben, finden hier die Installationsdateien für das Sprachenupdate:
Update Your Band-in-a-Box® 2025 to Build 1128 for Windows Today!
Already using Band-in-a-Box 2025 for Windows®? Download Build 1128 now from our Support Page to enjoy the latest enhancements and improvements from our team.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean