Dazz that device is designed by nature to capture audio coming in at a line level from a CD player or a vinyl record player. that is why the bundle the free audacity software with it. Audacity acts just like any audio recorder, and much like the sound recorder that is included in Windows. Except that it has plugins for processing the sound once captured. So this program looks at the natural path of incoming audio in windows and allows the process to happen. latency and timing are of no issue since it is a one time event audio streams in and is recorded, if there is a small delay it does not matter since it is not trying to match anything elses time code.

RB and PTPA are true DAW programs, and while they will do the audio capture thing, they look deeper for master time code, and compensate for possible midi data streams, and mulitple audio streams trying to make everything work together in time. So while they will function with MME or win sound drivers as audacity. For the most part they would introduce latency and timing would become a struggle. So when tracking audio in this type of environment you need an interface that allows you to use better drivers like ASIO or even better versions of WDM written for the interface to allow for latency compensation. While that corded device might do a decent job adding one track at a time to audacity, which could care less what was feeding it, it will not fair well with a true DAW program. If you want to really get this thing to run you need a real recording interface.

Audacity is not a true test of whether your system will record properly, as it is going to always work with just about any system. Try something like this http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/pro...face?sku=241710 or if cost is a big problem right now this http://pro-audio.musiciansfriend.com/product/Lexicon-Alpha-USB-Audio-Interface?sku=245507

HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB/RB 2026, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 11 , Presonus Audiobox USB96