Thanks everyone. Yes the vst plugin, I had seen it in action in some PG Youtube videos.
I'm not sure BIAB client base is 60+. I'm sure there are people from all ages using it.

So, based on the replies here BIAB hasn't been too ambitious and fulfill all its promises. That's good to hear since I've been considering making a purchase. I am into jazz fusion so I need more than a C chord or D minor. Was concerned about BIAB not playing mMaj7 for instance. But that's for another topic.

The point was to know whether or not BIAB should just have stayed in the "backing track business" improving with many new styles and real tracks, or make the switch like it did with a more complete offer. I still believe that it is not very user friendly to mix a new concept (recording and all the new features) in the original interface designed for only backing tracks and that it has its limitation if not in results at least in user friendly fashion. If you develop a new mindset for BIAB making it a more complete musical software I don't think that keeping the original interface is the way to go. But that's just me and some other may differ.

I'm glad to hear that people here are able to compose the way they want with BIAB regardless of the interface and bugs. It gives hope to me.

Angelo Napoli music