I want to say that I also support the request for a button for faster regeneration and say that my remarks have not been to convey the idea I don't but rather note my previous comments addressed the question posed in the title.

Regarding the question, "possible solutions?", first, the definition of 'workaround' on Google is that a workaround is "a method for overcoming a problem or limitation in a program or system." accepting that as a valid definition, the techniques I described above should not be considered workarounds no more than having to type on the keyboard to enter chords onto the Chord Chart. Respectfully, every method, technique, tool or feature I mention above are all normal components of the BIAB program and no procedure ventures outside of what are normal results of utilizing the functions.

For instance, there's nothing unusual and out of the ordinary of having 165 unused bars available to program shots, holds, rests and chord progressions to generate small audio clips to possibly use in your project. Audio is a definite component of BIAB as demonstrated by the Audio Track, Audio editor, ACW, Performance Tracks and the Audio Recording function. Placing multiple instruments on a track will always be faster than designating single instruments per track if the method is compatible with a song project.

My comments above are directed toward defining workaround, regarding faster re-generations, I don't see how any programming change can result in faster generations than using the unused bars of a song project to program 20-30 audio clips to audition and cut/paste into your project from a single generation of the song. I consider that a possible solution option and not a workaround.

But like others , I support the request because a programming change can produce a faster generation in a much simpler process than anything I've mentioned.

BIAB 2025:RB 2025, Latest builds: Dell Optiplex 7040 Desktop; Windows-10-64 bit, Intel Core i7-6700 3.4GHz CPU and 16 GB Ram Memory.