I'm no expert, but a few years back I and a friend wrote several songs that were copyrighted with the Library of Congress. This man that I knew had written several songs and collected royalties off of them. Even in Spain, he tutored me on the copyright law, but "I am no expert," by any means; that is why I titled this post this. This guy had way more experience than I did and I learned practically everything he knew about the copyright law. So, he was always against people doing cover songs. For the longest time I believed a person could get you put in jail or you could suffer being find or from being taken to court and sued. So, I never did any cover songs at that time that were copyrighted by other people before. Otherwise I would've been on YouTube a long time ago. Then one day I just decided to start doing cover songs; and I had a fairly successful YouTube channel because there was a up and coming YouTube star that put me on their channel which almost generated over 1 million hits. So, I got real worried about this. So I pulled down my YouTube channel that had that many hits and I had over 200,000 subscribers. I kind of felt bad about this because the person had put me on their YouTube channel was let down and I feel like I let those 200,000 people down. Well, I decided to create another YouTube channel and asked the person if they would put a link back up to my other YouTube channel and they said no! Not because I was doing cover songs, but because I let a lot of their subscribers down and they wouldn't post a link to my channel anymore. I know that this has nothing to do about the copyright law. But, one day, I got curious and I did call the copyright office and I asked them if you were allowed to do a cover song and they told me that you were allowed to do a cover song, not only that I called ASCAP and they also told me that you were allowed to do cover song's he said "Unfortunately yes you are" what he said was that a lot of the songwriters don't like this, but on the other hand a lot of them don't want the headache of suing you because it cost a lot and it is a long and drawn out process. The one thing he did say was that was if the band or the person or the publishing company that owns the rights to that song made a protest you would have to take it down, were I have no protest to that; That is what I would do. So I asked him; "this was at the copyright office" what was copyrightable in a song and they said it is the lyrics and the tune even if you do a cover songs or a parody. Because when you do a parody you're still breaking the copyright law because you're using the tune that was created by the said band. Now, there have been a few people have told me that I'm breaking the copyright law When I do covers on here. And those people know who I'm talking about. I'm not trying to be on ornery, mean, or start any type of controversy, and a lot of you people that are on this form are experts somewhat about the copyright law. Well, the person that told me that I shouldn't be doing cover songs and that I should just delete the cover song that I did and get a license for it, have essentially done the same thing by creating a parody song to the song called purple haze, well, they were not using the words; or shall I say he was not using the words, but he was using the melody and that is breaking the copyright law. The melody is copyrightable in copyright law. When I talked to the copyright office They told me the two elements that are copyrightable in a song are the melody and the words. You can't copyright the music but you can copyright the melody and the words. So doing what I did by posting a link to my cover song was no different than what he did by posting a link to his parody cover song. I responded after he posted the link to his cover song but never got a response back, HMM I wonder why? But anyhow, I wanted to make it clear and known on this form that it is not illegal to do a cover song as long as you email the publisher and this is what I did every single time I've done a cover song and notified them that I was going to be doing a cover songs of their artists song. It is against the law If you are making money using somebody else's material and it is against the law. If the publisher or the songwriter protest to you using their song. If they protest to it. You have to pull it down or you will get sued. But other than that, simply doing a cover songs and posting it is not against the law If you let the publisher and the artist know what you're doing and they don't protest to it. Besides when you create a song you would be crazy not to let a person do a cover song of it because if they were really popular on any digital platform your song sales would just blow up. The YouTube star that I talked about a while ago, well, her mother was a music attorney and she gave me this advice some time ago because I was very scared that I would get sued if I posted a cover song, and she told me that as long as you send an email with your intention to record a cover song and they don't protest to it. You don't have to pull it down. You just can't make any money off of it. I would like your guys input on this. But please don't post any nasty or mean comments because that would be up against the forms, rules. And I know what the terms of service says on this forum that you're not allowed to post a link to a cover song and I have done that, but the very people told me that have done that same thing.So please give your input in a nice way. Thank you! Also, let's all follow the forum rules by not posting links to any said cover song even parody if you are using the tune.
Last edited by trapper456; 04/30/2001:29 PM. Reason: Added content at the end.
Music is an expression that is a universal language, Never criticize anybody to harshly. They need time to grow but when they do, they do. Always be kind in what you say and do because the man upstairs is watching.
I'm not an expert either but, I've been looking into this and here's what I've learned.
Royalties is an extremely complex subject.
There are two types of copyrights on music. 1.Sound recording .......whoever owns the sound recording 2.Composition.......the song writer and/or the publisher
There are different types of royalties. -Performance royalties -Mechanical royalties
Simply stated, if you write a song, you own the composition copyright. The challenge is, pursuing your rights and any associated royalties.
To do a cover you need a licence. That could be a mechanical license "like what is used for live performances" and/or a sync licence to put the music with a video.
I believe some artists/publishers allow YT covers, while others don't.
If you write a song and somebody else uses it, what will you do about it? Will you hire a lawyer to sue somebody? At what cost? If the party has made money on your song, lawyers may what to get involved so they can benefit. If No money was made, who's going to chase this copyright infringement?
The flip side is teams of attorneys are combing through the internet to look for opportunities to make money. Some publishers want complete control over the songs they own and do not want anyone using the material. Also, big labels are hiring people to find anything that even sounds like the copyrighted material. YouTube is using algorithms to find and block content they see as copyrighted.
Recently,there have been law suites won on pretty slim grounds, such as, It feels like the original.
A couple of things. At least three issues have been raised here. You Tube went through a stage of development in which copyright holders were looking the other way, so to speak. That started to change around 2013. One of the leading lights in that change was the Harry Fox agency, who worked it out with You Tube to provide You Tube licenses. They are the people I suggest you be talking to. Your Copyright connection seems less than helpful, though I am far from an expert, or even up to date. https://www.harryfox.com I've used HFA, though not for YouTube. What I am posting here is hearsay. I'd like to hear how this works for you if you try it, the You Tube license.
Usually I will post my songs to YouTube. I.E. They allow it, just recently soundcloud. I make no money at all off of this, yes some publishers don't want you using it. That is percisly why I e-mail the publisher, record company, and artist if available that way if they protest to it I can either not post it, or pull it down right away if there is a problem. I can understand some bands don't want their music being used like "The Eagles" I got a video blocked all over the internet because they are against that, this is their bread winner even today. I pulled it down, and no problem. I am just saying that if you let them know ahead of time they can either say yes or no; But if they say no you better pull it down! That way you don't even have to post the fair use law because they are not protesting and therefor there must be no problem.
Music is an expression that is a universal language, Never criticize anybody to harshly. They need time to grow but when they do, they do. Always be kind in what you say and do because the man upstairs is watching.
I usually post all my songs to YouTube, but I get an e-mail telling me it's third party and I don't have to do anything. If I happen to protest I could get sued. I just do my craft because I enjoy sharing my talent with singing. I love to share it in my preference in music. You would use an origination like "Harry Fox" If you want to sell it. Like I mentioned, if you email the publisher, artist, and record company chances are that you are not going to get into trouble if they don't have a complaint with it.
Music is an expression that is a universal language, Never criticize anybody to harshly. They need time to grow but when they do, they do. Always be kind in what you say and do because the man upstairs is watching.
Getting a license isn't that hard, because cover songs fall under what is called a compulsory license - which means exactly what it says, they have to give it to you. Consider it a courtesy to the songwriters/publishers to let them know there is money out there to be collected from youtube.
How do you get a compulsory license and how much does it cost? Never knew about this.
Music is an expression that is a universal language, Never criticize anybody to harshly. They need time to grow but when they do, they do. Always be kind in what you say and do because the man upstairs is watching.
Write to Harry Fox. When I was making CDs the amount was based on the number of CDs you manufacture. I don't know how it works for digital distribution.
BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Trapper you've said time and time again, you're not making money off this. That has NOTHING to do with it so just stop writing that. You are correct with your thinking the rights holder controls this, they do.
See the brand new thread with the person asking what to do because he just got a take down notice from YouTube. The point there is apparently you can get a take down notice just because the YT computer thinks it could be a violation and not only because the rights holder complained about it. That's what I thought all along but other people have been saying no, it doesn't work that way so now I'm confused too. Maybe the other poster didn't explain exactly what happened correctly, I don't know.
Understand what YT does is their thing, they're a private company and can do anything they want. It's not necessarily what copyright law says. That's the same thing here on PG's forums. PG decides how to handle the posting of covers and the last I heard they defer to YouTube. If it's up on YT then it's ok to post it here but not on the Songwriters forum. That forum is for originals only but if you want to post something in this thread it's ok as long as it's on YT.
OK I'll go with that; but what I am just trying to get across in simple terms, is that if you send out a letter of intent to put up a song you are giving the copyright holder, either publisher, or writer, or record company a chance to say no! you can't so that. Then you just move on to another song. But, if they send you an email saying go ahead then you can do it. If they don't get into contact with you about it just assume that it's OK. If they later decide to tell you to take it down, you take it down. I just had a Michael Jackson song removed without any notice I am not going to protest it, throw a fit about it, or re-post it because it is their property and with something like this you just don't want to tempt fate. They were kind enough not to sue so don't give them a reason to. I also got permission from a songwriter named "Jason Blume" that wrote a song called "Change My Mind" he gave me permission to record, and post his song on YouTube. He gets any ad revenue off of this, he said it was OK and he even thanked me for recording it, and posting it. I had a YouTube strike one time because I recorded and posted the song by "Supertramp" "Take The Long Way Home" I got this strike one time for 15 months, OK they did not want their song redone by anyone. But, I know that you are really taking your chances when you do this, but most of the time they will usually have you take it down or they will take it down because it is a lot of money to sue someone and they probably don't want the headache. As far as that other poster if you post anything tell him to take it down and don't complain about it because then you are opening yourself up to a possible law suit and maybe even getting your you-tube channel taken down, YouTube takes things a little more serious than people may think because like you said they have their own rules and they can do what they want. I know people that have posted cover songs and their entire channel decimated over night. As far as posting the song's I only do that because I am becoming better, and better with "BIAB" and I like to show off my skill and talent. I will keep in mind though not to post my links to the songwriters forum unless it is original. I will post it in the to the other forums that are dedicated to that, Thanks for that bit of wisdom!
Last edited by trapper456; 05/01/2007:04 PM. Reason: Made some changes.
Music is an expression that is a universal language, Never criticize anybody to harshly. They need time to grow but when they do, they do. Always be kind in what you say and do because the man upstairs is watching.
P.S. If I want more traffic I will from now on promote my songs with YouTube.
Music is an expression that is a universal language, Never criticize anybody to harshly. They need time to grow but when they do, they do. Always be kind in what you say and do because the man upstairs is watching.
The Harry fox agency is easy to navigate and license songs. While we only release songs we wrote or public domain songs (for which we own all rights) we would never consider covering a song w/o a license. A properly published song is intellectual property. Whether the owner makes virtually nothing off it or they make millions it is still their property and to cover it it one buys the right. Because it is hard to enforce doesn’t change that.
Several years back I literally stumbled across a glowing review of one of our songs. Unfortunately it was not our recording. A gospel group recorded it and when I contacted them a member said they had tried to reach us. Hmmmmm. We settled on a one time blanket license fee for which we made a charitable donation. It was a weird feeling. Sorta like somebody had stolen my bike!
FWIW, IMHO, etc.,
Be well.
Bud
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos
This same question about YouTube is going on right now on the Keyboard Corner Forum. The Harry Fox Agency came up and this was the answer from one guy:
Sorry but this does not apply to video. The license HFA can issue is a mechanical license for using the music like recording and distributing a cover. But when you put it to video it requires a Sync license, which HFA does not cover. That has to be negotiated directly with the artist.
Is this correct? I don't know but it should be easily answered with a phone call or check HFA's website. It does sound like exactly what you're talking about Trapper.
Most on the KC forum are saying don't worry about it and a lot of the people there are music biz insiders. You're allowed three strikes before anything bad happens, the strikes only last for 6 months and you have every right to dispute it as was explained here. You lose the protest, take it down. No harm, no foul. Here's an interesting vid by Rick Beato. If you don't know him he has a great YT channel, he's a killer musician, producer, recording engineer and knows all kinds of music biz related things:
It really boils down to what songs you're covering. Huge mega hits by superstars almost certainly won't fly but if you're doing 40-50 year old blues, folk, jazz, country it's probably not a problem. But if you want to cover the big name superstar rock acts from the 70-80's's good luck. Journey, the Eagles, the Stones, Led Zep, Michael Jackson, probably won't work.
The best suggestion I read over there is simply do a search of the song title. If you can't find anything other than the original artist or another big name artist where it's obvious they got permission like Willie Nelson does Sinatra or something like that don't bother uploading a cover, it's probably a waste of time.
...You want to include a musical work as part of an audio-visual project (e.g., music video, film, commercial, karaoke, or “CD+G”). The right to include a pre-existing musical work in time-relation with an audio-visual project is typically known as the “synchronization” or “synch” right, and it requires permission from the copyright owner of the musical work. If you are a music distribution company seeking assistance in obtaining and administering synchronization licenses for commercial use or are distributing a video for non-commercial use that includes music you don’t own or control, HFA’s Rumblefish may be able to assist.
Our albums and singles are on Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon Music, YouTube Music, Pandora and more. If interested search on Janice Merritt. Thanks! Our Videos
From FAQ: Synchronization rights do not include the right to publicly perform music if your audio-visual project is transmitted to the public. In that case, you may need a public performance license from one of the performing rights organizations: SESAC ASCAP BMI GMR -------------- Seems like it's somewhere to start.
Last edited by rharv; 05/03/2002:29 AM.
I do not work here, but the benefits are still awesome Make your sound your own!
Got really excited this morning as Rumblefish offers a $100 pm blanket license for the synch licenses to the two million songs in their catalogue. One small problem! I don’t recognize one of those two million songs!
How do I get my synchronization license? Synchronization License: This is the right to synchronize a song or a piece of music with your visual image. It must be obtained from the copyright owner of the music, which is usually the publisher. You can find out who the publisher is by using ASCAP's Clearance Express (ACE) at www.ascap.com/ace.
Music is an expression that is a universal language, Never criticize anybody to harshly. They need time to grow but when they do, they do. Always be kind in what you say and do because the man upstairs is watching.
By "he" I think you mean me.... since you did refer to a recent parody I did of Purple Haze that I named Yello Hayz.
So, yes, you can record covers and post them to You Tube. They have digital spiders that roam the newly posted stuff and determine if it's a cover some from the melody according to their algorithms. They check if that artist allows covers and if so they monitize it giving the revenue to that artist. If the artist doesn't allow it then they take it down. This apparently was the only workable solution for them and agreeable with most artists. If you have the HFA license, you can tell them and YOU can collect the revenue.
You are correct.... melody and lyrics are copyrightable. HOWEVER, there is a provision in the copyright law that excludes in-the-classroom/educational-use of songs that allow teachers to use music without worrying about the copyright. The other provision is to use the song in a parody. The forces to be realized that in order to use the song as a parody to deliver the message, with the words being changed to covey the new parody message, it would be necessary to allow such use to use the original melody without running into a legal road block. It is for this reason, I was able to legally use the melody of the original Purple Haze in the song without being a scofflaw. I'd recommend a book I have in my library called THIS BUSINESS OF MUSIC as it explains this and other things about copyright law in more detail than you probably want to hear, and with examples from the past (case law) as to why the law is written like it is.
BTW, I had a few things going on and never was able to get back in time to reply to the last several folks including you. When I was able to get back it had fallen off the first few pages and was forgotten by me. My apologies. Life has a way of intruding when you least expect it. I'll leave it at that.
One more request.... please use paragraph spacing and breaks to make large posts like that easier to read. That was killer on the eyes.
Last edited by Guitarhacker; 05/05/2005:48 AM.
You can find my music at: www.herbhartley.com Add nothing that adds nothing to the music. You can make excuses or you can make progress but not both.
The magic you are looking for is in the work you are avoiding.
I looked this information up on the copyright law in fair use: As far as I can see, there is no provision in Section 107 of the copyright law for Parody's.
Here is the information that I found.
107. Limitations on exclusive rights: Fair use40
Notwithstanding the provisions of sections 106 and 106A, the fair use of a copyrighted work, including such use by reproduction in copies or phonorecords or by any other means specified by that section, for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching (including multiple copies for classroom use), scholarship, or research, is not an infringement of copyright. In determining whether the use made of a work in any particular case is a fair use the factors to be considered shall include—
(1) the purpose and character of the use, including whether such use is of a commercial nature or is for nonprofit educational purposes;
(2) the nature of the copyrighted work;
(3) the amount and substantiality of the portion used in relation to the copyrighted work as a whole; and
(4) the effect of the use upon the potential market for or value of the copyrighted work.
The fact that a work is unpublished shall not itself bar a finding of fair use if such finding is made upon consideration of all the above factors.
By the way I do have that book that you are talking about, I just have not gotten round to reading it though. My music teacher is using BIAB to teach me music and he told me to post the result's so he can see what I am doing as far as chord structure;
I am learning the guitar and the piano and voice. and music theory at an older age so I can eventually get around to composing my own music.
Most of the time I am using YouTube also and YouTube has a provision like you said, were the artist of the songs can collect the revenue off of their song's; whenever I do post something they always tell me that the claimant's of the copyright claim will be collecting the ad revenue; I am not collecting anything for myself or my talent's.
We are all doing the same thing when it comes to posting a cover, or a Parody, it's all the same thing; except I am getting music lessons and my music teacher is keeping tabs on my progress. so, if a parody is allowed for criticism then educational purposes are also allowed
Last edited by trapper456; 05/05/2009:31 AM. Reason: None
Music is an expression that is a universal language, Never criticize anybody to harshly. They need time to grow but when they do, they do. Always be kind in what you say and do because the man upstairs is watching.
Last Chance! The Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® Special Ends Today (May 31, 2026) at 11:59pm PDT!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PDT today!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the amazing new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. View the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to transcribe an entire track or transcribe specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Mac® to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Special Offers Extended Until May 31st!
Good news- we've extended our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® special offers until May 31, 2026!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 is packed with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can transcribe an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PDT on May 31st, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Check out the Band-in-a-Box® for Mac packages page to find the best package for you.
Today's the Last Day of the Band-in-a-Box 2026® for Mac Special!
Order before 11:59pm PDT today (May 15, 2026) to save up to 50% off your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrade and receive a FREE Bonus PAK loaded with great new Add-ons to use with this new version!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!
Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.
Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.
If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!
202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!
With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!
Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.
Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.
And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.
The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
Playable RealTracks Set 5
RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean