charlie.
my reply.
1. SMT/VLSI chips.
i always understood that MTR's utilised some custom propriatary engineered VLSI/SMT unique to each company/product, and its not as simple as useing just common parts one would find in any electronics catalogue.

2. BIAB/RB.
the user has to have a certain level of knowledge to use
BIAB , thus why not go the whole hog, and record all song audio in daw software on the same computer ??
like i've been doing for ages with no problems, like a slew of other people all over the world ??
the key is the right audio interface.
this part of your argument i dont get. one has already used BIAB to do a songs bed traks on computer. so why not use RB or another daw to do the rest on the same computer ??

so you have peaked my curiosity. what is your workflow on a song ??
beds/guide traks useing biab THEN MTR for vocs etc etc ??
is this because youve had probs with audio interfaces ??
what audio interface do you use currently ??


ps. every time ive tried screens/menus on an MTR, at a music store it just wasnt for me.
couldnt get on with it. much happier on computer. but thats me i guess.
-------------------------------------------------------------
back to original thread.
for benchmarkers and particularly DAWBENCH there are radio shows/podcasts , just google DAWBENCH radio show podcast.
-------------------------------------------------------------




Last edited by justanoldmuso; 10/26/20 11:17 AM.
my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)