That was a fun read smile

I am relatively new to PG world, but I do have a more positive view than some in this thread. I believe BIAB is standing at crossroads at this point in time. It has a great potential of "getting to be known". As mentioned above, I also believe a Plugin (and a standalone of plugin) after initial conception are matured enough for prime time thanks to Adar, pipeline and many, many other people who contributed. The VST and a handful of RT's priced right could have significant shift in a better direction.... And of course a demo version, the one without reaching for a wallet of that "light" package. Not sure if it is in place, perhaps a student discount?

I also agree, that it would make sense at least to try releasing some requested tracks and sell them in smaller, style or instrument specific packages throughout the year. "Cello" "Flutes" etc,... I do not see a harm in this, because if they do not get proper traction, they can be included in main catalog by the year end.


"I'd change the name because most people don't even realize how powerful it is. They still think of the old-school MIDI product for Windows from the 90's"

I do not agree with this statement, simply because most just do not know what it means or stands for, so they can not attribute or draw any parallels. Name is absolutely fine and fun. I would probably never (re)discovered BIAB if not for a friend that showed it to me in modern reincarnation. But word of mouth is a bit antiquated way. It needs a well deserved display.

To me, BIAB is nearly complete. As soon as Utility Tracks will have same bar functions as legacy tracks, I will be 90%+ satisfied with it. But, as Videotrack said: "there's always room for improvements..." smile