Previous Thread
Index
Next Thread
Print Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,128
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,128
Yes, I can see that a user-definable offset value could go a long way to allow the user to set everything to their own requirements.


BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
Originally Posted By: Noel96

This is what I've found out so far for various nomenclature...

Middle C = C5, Fruity Loops

Middle C = C5, Bandlabs Sonar

Middle C = C5, Mixcraft

Middle C = C4, Reaper

Middle C = C4, Roland

Middle C = C3, Cubase

Middle C = C3, Yamaha

Middle C = C3, Kontakt

Middle C = C3, Studio One



Exactly how do you come up with this? Do you own these products? Are these products sounding a musical pitch and you are checking them against a tuner? If this is true it appears to me a lot of programmer analysts need to come out into the real world. The programmer's programming the tuners all got it correct.

Last edited by bowlesj; 12/18/20 09:31 PM.

John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
Another tuner that agrees Middle C is C4. A guitar tuner to boot but it runs on the Iphone.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tl767iZmggo#t=1m30s

Last edited by bowlesj; 12/18/20 09:35 PM.

John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,636
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,636
Originally Posted By: bowlesj
Exactly how do you come up with this? Do you own these products? Are these products sounding a musical pitch and you are checking them against a tuner? If this is true it appears to me a lot of programmer analysts need to come out into the real world. The programmer's programming the tuners all got it correct.

Hi again, John.

Google helped me find the information. I typed in manufacturers and looked at how they defined middle C. That's what led me to links like the below...

https://discuss.cakewalk.com/index.php?/topic/2464-why-does-cakewalk-call-middle-c-c5/

https://vi-control.net/community/threads/is-middle-c-c3-or-c4.53035/

https://www.logicprohelp.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=91282

https://goldmidi.com/community/resources/middle-c-in-fl-studio.59/

and so on...

As you've already mentioned, the most important thing common to all is that middle c is note 60 and then multiples of 12 will take one up/down octaves. That does not change.

e.g. note numbers: 60 (mid C), 72 (up octave), 48 (down octave), etc.

Regards,
Noel


MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2026
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,618
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,618
I use MIDI in my DAW. I have a better choice of software MIDI synths there, and I want to see notation. No need to create audio tracks all the time.


BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
Quote:
the most important thing common to all is that middle c is note 60 and then multiples of 12 will take one up/down octaves


Hi Noel. Thanks for the info on the software companies that are getting it wrong. Although I spent more time making money as a programmer than making money as a musician I disagree with your statement above. Yes the midi numbers are correct and that is fine because it has to be this way. I agree with everything in the table and it matches your statement above (all midi numbers for the C note divide evenly by 12 in the table). But getting the middle C scientific notation number correct is more important because none programming musicians will tend to be unhappy with that fact that software people can't even get that scientific notation number correct. The best evidence of this attitude I see is that I have a lot of trouble getting none programming musicians to use a computer form at my jam club. Most members are IT people like me. Again, smart software people know computers should not confuse the client and not getting the scientific notation octave number correct will clearly confuse them. The way I see it PG-Music should put this in as an option and the more I think about it the more I come to realize they should make Middle C default to C4. I also am beginning to realize PG-Music should fix this A.S.A.P. This error will tend to turn off vocalists and anyone trying to deal with key changes. They will think this way. All the free tuning software gets it correct but a software costing $129 US and up can't even get it correct. They will see one software company getting wrong because another software company got it wrong as the blind leading the blind. It clearly does not help sales. I did a complete about face and steered the vocalist clear of BIAB when I saw the Vocal Wizard was all screwed up. He agreed to wait until it is fixed.

I will leave myself a reminder to check each BIAB release to see if this is fixed. When the fix goes in I will upgrade and let the vocalist(s) in the group know. There are actually 4 of them (three of them don't have BIAB). I will send the email out to the whole group of 30 that this has been fixed and send a picture of the vocal wizard as well.

In the midi pitch frequency table maybe C0 is called zero because humans cannot hear it. So with this idea C1 would mean the first C that humans can hear. If my theory is correct then these midi people understand what I am talking about. They are likely to be systems analysts (a step above programmers) or maybe systems coordinators (even farther up the experience chain). In other words they choose zero because it relates to humans in some way rather than 0 or 1 being standard in computer programming tables.

Last edited by bowlesj; 12/19/20 05:30 AM.

John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,636
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 20,636
Originally Posted By: bowlesj
This error will tend to turn off vocalists and anyone trying to deal with key changes. They will think this way. All the free software gets it correct but a software costing $129 US and up can't even get it correct. It clearly does not help sales.

Hi John,

As already mentioned, I agree with you. And I am not writing the below to be argumentative. It's not my style. I simply seek to clarify the MIDI system of C3, C4, C5 options for middle C as someone who lives outside the USA and is not an American.

The different references for middle C (C5, C4 or C3) are not errors. All are correct because there is no standard in this nomenclature. The standard is defining middle C as note #60.

Different companies have chosen to follow their own paths determined by how they choose to number the lowest reference C. After a little more reading, it seems that C4 is popular in the USA but C3 and C5 are common outside the USA.

An analogy for me is the kilogram, metre, second, Celsius system of measurements. Throughout an awful lot of the world, these are the standard measurements for weight, length, time and temperature. They are also the scientific standard. That's what we use here in Australia. In the USA, though, I understand that people use pounds, inches, seconds and Fahrenheit. Even though the metric system is referred to as the "scientific standard" in a lot of places, this doesn't mean that the Imperial system has no place. It's also not an error. It's just different.

Given that BIAB is used worldwide, it makes sense to have all options available so that the customers can choose the middle C option that matches whatever else they have for making music and wherever in the world they live.

Regards,
Noel


MY SONGS...
Audiophile BIAB 2026
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
Thanks Noel. I agree.

When I recommend a change to software I at times suggest making it an option for two reasons. 1/ I don't have time to research and know everything. 2/ for backward comparability just in case (you never know how some users may be using the software).

PG-Music probably already realize this but I will say it anyways. This is actually a major change. I think it would be wise if they have an install popup when they fix this to ask the user how they want middle C to be represented in scientific musical notation. On the popup I am sure some users would find info links helpful (maybe the ones I have have used in this thread and maybe more). Ideally the popup should know if the user saw the popup before and what they chose before and tell them how to change it later after install. One more thing. The popup should list the items it effects in the program (the windows that use it, etc). It is starting to look like this change will take more than 4 days :-) Maybe 4 weeks :-) Making suggestions is easy. Making it reality not so much :-) Been there, done that :-)

Regards,
John

Last edited by bowlesj; 12/19/20 05:02 AM.

John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,618
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,618
Ha, I can offer no defense for the USA not using the metric system. At least my granddaughters are learning what it is, so perhaps there is hope someday. As for where Middle C is, for a music software company, this was a Hobson’s “pick your poison” Choice. It’s either Roland or Yamaha. Choose one and the other is wrong.


BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
This google search brings of a lot of hits. I wish I had time to read it :-)
why do some musicians use C5 or C3 rather than C4?


John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
Originally Posted By: Matt Finley
As for where Middle C is, for a music software company, this was a Hobson’s “pick your poison” Choice. It’s either Roland or Yamaha. Choose one and the other is wrong.


Having it as an option avoids unproductive fighting but make it obvious the option is there. Give the user the option to turn the popup off.


John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,128
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 21,128
This is continuing to be an extremely interesting discussion. I agree, something needs to be done to allow a user to adopt a 'preference' (notice I didn't say 'standard') that suits their system operations.

The analogy to metric vs imperial is a classic. Having grown up with imperial and switching to metric as an adult, I've got no idea how that other system is still in use (I can comfortably use both, but I know which one I prefer). Anyhow, my 'metric' is that middle-C is the first C note below A 440Hz (440 cycles per second grin ) But again, I digress, 25.4 apologies.


BIAB & RB2026 Win.(Audiophile), Windows 10 Pro & Windows 11, Cakewalk Bandlab, Izotope Prod.Bundle, Roland RD-1000, Synthogy Ivory, Session Keys Grand S & Electric R, Kontakt, Focusrite 18i20, KetronSD2, NS40M, Pioneer Active Monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
Another slightly different google search.
what middle C standard do most musicians use C3 or C4 or C5?

Paydirt! (right near the top of that search)
We will follow the International Standards Organization (ISO) system for register designations. In that system, middle C (the first ledger line above the bass staff or the first ledger line below the treble staff) is C4. An octave higher than middle C is C5, and an octave lower than middle C is C3.

So now I have a suggestion for PG-Music. Make C4 the default option in the popup and make sure you mention in the popup that C4 is the International Standards Organization (ISO) option (protect yourself from the darts and contribute to the benefit of all). I think international means the whole world standard. So now I think I have my best guess as to why all the tuners are using C4. The phone tuners are more recent and more likely to use the ISO standard. Europe has been around a longer time. More likely have a greater number of people do not want to learn new things. However I have not taken the time to read any hits in this search. why do some musicians use C5 or C3 rather than C4?. Am I jumping to conclusions when I think it is because they just do not want to be inconvenienced and learn something new for the good of all? I don't know. I do know that most people do not like being inconvenienced.

Last edited by bowlesj; 12/19/20 07:43 AM.

John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,618
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
Joined: Jul 2000
Posts: 27,618
I think we clearly established in the original thread why we think BIAB should just create a user setting to specify which value is used for Middle C. We can then choose the value depending on the hardware and software we use and the education we received.

I also think we won’t solve why it is what it is. In the case of technology, being around longer is not an advantage. Right or wrong, the innovators developing the hardware and software chose their preferences, and that includes the USA, Japan, UK, South Korea, and now China. But they failed to all agree on a standard. No matter; just please give us a choice and we’re done here.


BIAB 2026 Win Audiophile. Software: Fender Studio One 8, Swam horns, Acoustica-7, Notion 6, Song Master Pro, Win 11 Home. Hardware: Intel i9, 32 Gb; Fender Quantom HD8 & Faderport 8, Royer 121, Adam Sub8 & Neumann 120 monitors.
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
I went back to my original post and made an update to it because I noticed that the table I have mentioned over and over again has the letters "ISO" in the upper left corner. Here is the update I made. The changes are in red.

My second post above references this "International Standards Organization (ISO)" music pitches table.
http://people.virginia.edu/~pdr4h/pitch-freq.html
which has it correct (notice the "MC" standing for Middle C at C4). See the comment at the bottom of the table.

I have to assume these ISO people are better than average at choosing a standard. However I still feel BIAB should make C3 and C5 an option (not the default options) and many of the links I have brought to this thread should be available on that popup. Don't put ISO beside the default C4 option. Instead put "International Standards Organization (ISO)" and immediately direct them to the table and point out it is created by this organisation. I completely missed the ISO on that table. How Am I suppose to know what ISO stands for even if I did notice it? Maybe the ISO should create a standard of not using Acronyms :-)

Last edited by bowlesj; 12/19/20 08:38 AM.

John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
I finally clued in. ISA and ISO are different Acronyms but upon further research they end up being the same.
ISA= International Standards Association.
ISO= International Standardization Organization (ISO is the table acronym).
I think they are trying to shift away from the ISA acronym because it has so many other meanings.

Anyway here are some rough draft ideas for the popup.

Quote:
Options box:
C4 (default checked) "International Standards Association (ISO)" option. "Advantages link".
C3
C5

Educational links Below. Do not show this popup again==>" ".


The advantages link could say "To the best of our knowledge all chromatic tuners follow the ISO standard. Choosing C4 causes the (Vocal Wizard the notation window staff lines) to match these tuners.". You might want to list as many tuners as you can find as I did that show the note in scientific notation and show the frequency. This will be helpful for some wanting to buy a tuner.

The educational links could be in the form of questions. They click on it to get the answer.


I found one tuner in 9 tuners that does not follow the "International Standardization Organization (ISO)" standard. The BIAB tuner. I have updated the 1st post.

Last edited by bowlesj; 12/19/20 10:49 AM.

John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,676
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,676
bowlesj
merry xmas to you, and all in this thread.
my own feelings on the subject of scientific notation.

1. i am really trying to understand , as i was reading this thread, why the lack of this method in biab is a possible "showstopper". ie some people wont buy biab for lack of it.
(it hasnt stopped loads of people all over the world useing biab and showing their songs in the user showcase.)
2. zillions of songs were done long before computers and music software.
typically , even today, after a song is arranged, in studios large and small a new vocalist will do test runs in different keys with a backing band live. then everyone sits down and assesses the best song approach and key etc.
etc etc. and any needed changes to get the best performance, and present the song in the best light.
3.. thus. haveing done the chord arrange in biab couldnt you try various test runs with whoever the vocalist is
and assess via key and arrangement choices the best solution ?
4.. my vocal method is , as follows haveing laid down the biab arrangement.
(believe me when i say i am harder on myself than anyone else might be. i'm uber critical to a fault.)
a. i export from biab into the daw a test stereo beds mix.
b. i lay down several vocal traks in daw trying different vocal styles.
figuring out what works and what doesnt. and different nuances and lyric change impacts.
all the time i'm assessing what the song needs.
c. if not happy, rinse and repeat, trying different keys etc etc.
all along i'm also testing out different voc harmonies i lay down.
ie how well do they fit in ??
the above is jusr a small sampling of methods i use , and i would respectfully suggest way more thorough than useing a vocal wizard, because i'm doing it with the actual song that my vocs will end up on.


PLEASE NOTE.
i'm not saying i'm a brilliant vocalist. and i'm not saying i'm the worst. ive just developed various techniques over the years. ive sung in all sorts of groups from church choirs thru heavy rock. i think over the years ive sung every possible style. its all the love of music to me.
and all through that time ive never heard people discuss this subject of scientific notation. and believe me when i say ive
done songs with people way more talented than i am.
includeing brilliant conductors//arrangers//musicians.
(and i DO know when my vocs arent up to par. on some original songs.so i move on to a different song idea.
I AM REALISTIC.)


in closeing, also i feel there are more pressing feature requests that have been requested for ages by pg users.
like the "oddball" fundamental chorus feature change needed.
if its a few simple lines of code. why not ? do the feature. but, haveing worked in industry, sometimes the impacts can be more than a few simple lines of code.

merry to all.
muso.



Last edited by justanoldmuso; 12/19/20 10:53 AM.

my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
Quote:
i am really trying to understand , as i was reading this thread, why the lack of this method in biab is a possible "showstopper". ie some people wont buy biab for lack of it.
(it hasnt stopped loads of people all over the world using biab and showing their songs in the user showcase.)


#1 The vocalist in our group is asking for BIAB key changes. I was hoping the Vocal Wizard could make this easier. Currently it makes it harder. May as well remove it. Not a big fan of the BIAB tuner. The vocalist does not have BIAB either.
#2 My google searches in a very short period of time have uncovered probably 20 forum posts about the use of C3 and C5 rather than C4. I have to guess this is a very small tip of the ice berg. Simple answer. Wasted time because a standard is not being followed.




Last edited by bowlesj; 12/19/20 11:09 AM.

John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,676
J
Veteran
Offline
Veteran
J
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 3,676
bowlesj
does your vocalist have daw software ?
if so just give the vocalist a bed traks stereo mix from biab in different keys ? for practice , and to see what works .
then youll get feedback from vocallist which one is preferred ,
and which one the vocallist feels more comfortable with.
thats what i used to do.
also most vocallists know anyway in advance what they are
comfortable with, thus this should narrow down choices.
ive done the above on gear from 2 inch MT machines down to portastudios. lol.

have a merry.
muso.


my songs....mixed for good earbuds...(fyi..my vocs on all songs..)
https://soundcloud.com/alfsongs
(90 songs created useing bb/rb)
(lots of tips of mine in pg tips forum.)
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
B
bowlesj Offline OP
Expert
OP Offline
Expert
B
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 803
Thanks Muso, its an okay idea but a fair bit of work. Better to get it correct the first time.

I have the vocalists range in ISO standard using his tuner. To use the BIAB vocal wizard I have to increment the range by 1. But I for some reason don't trust it.

I agree with Matt. The case is presented. There is not much more to say other than this. These vocalists want to use phone tuners which follow the ISO standard. If BIAB can adapt to this standard as default option it may mean more sales. Not following this standard is like a big scratch on a shiny car.

Last edited by bowlesj; 12/19/20 11:38 AM.

John Bowles
My playing in my 20s:
https://www.reverbnation.com/johnbowles
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Go To
Page 2 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
ChatPG

Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.

ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.

PG Music News
Last Chance! The Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® Special Ends Today (May 31, 2026) at 11:59pm PDT!

Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PDT today!

We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!

Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.

Another exciting new addition is the amazing new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. View the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to transcribe an entire track or transcribe specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.

There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!

Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Mac® to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!

Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.

If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Special Offers Extended Until May 31st!

Good news- we've extended our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® special offers until May 31, 2026!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 is packed with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can transcribe an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!

There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.

When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PDT on May 31st, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.

Check out the Band-in-a-Box® for Mac packages page to find the best package for you.

Holiday Weekend Hours

It's Victoria Day Long Weekend in Canada. Our Customer Service hours are:

Saturday, May 16: Closed
Sunday, May 17: Closed
Monday, May 18: 8:00am - 4:00pm

Regular hours
resume Tuesday, May 19th!

Today's the Last Day of the Band-in-a-Box 2026® for Mac Special!

Order before 11:59pm PDT today (May 15, 2026) to save up to 50% off your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrade and receive a FREE Bonus PAK loaded with great new Add-ons to use with this new version!

Don't wait - order today!

Check out all the new features in the redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!

Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!

Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!

Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.

Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.

If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!

202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!

With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!

Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!

Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.

Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.

Check out all the 202 new RealTracks (in sets 468-488)!

And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.

The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!

2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!

With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!

These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!

This Free Bonus PAK includes:

  • The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK: -For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles. -For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles. -For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
  • MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
  • MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
  • Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
  • Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
  • Playable RealTracks Set 5
  • RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
  • SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
  • iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
  • 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
  • FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
  • MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
  • MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
  • Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
  • Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
  • RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
  • SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)

Learn more about the Bonus PAK and 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!

Forum Statistics
Forums57
Topics86,461
Posts805,334
Members40,126
Most Online64,515
Apr 8th, 2026
Newest Members
Gomez, Zoltan Bekesi, kmmkelsns874, Goodmanje, AlfredoR616
40,126 Registered Users
Top Posters(30 Days)
MarioD 135
DC Ron 90
rsdean 89
WaoBand 67
Today's Birthdays
George_H, Ifiddler
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5