Originally Posted By: Rob Helms
Is this any different than when others of us don't like changes forced on us that affect our workflow? When we do that we are called out for standing in the way of progress? Maybe there is a little bit of "old guard" in all of us.

Well, yes, it is quite different!

NOT Old Guard = "don't change the workflow in a non-standard program (BIAB) to an arbitrary new non-standard way"

Old Guard = "don't add panning" (even though it is standard in the base product and every other track-based product ever invented!)

Quote:
Having said that I stand by my view that options are a good thing, and would support a check box option.

Thanks! I agree retaining legacy config is an important step, just like they retained the old GUI and some of us still use it!

Quote:
However I have to point out that having to click the "eye" to access a couple legacy tracks that are not even used to start with in a style doesn't seem like a real big deal.

You could use this argument to oppose any improvement.

Quote:
LOL sorry for my frivolity! I assure you I am just joshing a bit here.

Ahhh, 'tis Christmas Eve. Enjoy your frivolity. But I admit I was hoping you knew something when you suggested I could turn the legacy mixer back on.