I think another way to look at it is that if you make a list of all the things it does and how each relates to the other, it becomes clear that this software would be extremely difficult to make any other way. Add to the fact that it is under constant scrutiny and pressure to change to the whims of users that use a plethora of different DAW and synth programs.

Melody builder
Chord builder
Auto Chord wizards
Real drums
Real tracks
Super midi tracks

Just to name a few the add stuff like song structures features, DAW plugin boxes, you name it and try to sort those out to make sense to thousands of users that all have a slightly different workflow process. You begin to see the ominous job PGM has to to do each passing year.

There has been many refinements and I expect that will continue, but any time someone compares BiaB to some other software I cring, as they are truly the most extreme examples of apples and oranges. BiaB is more of a fruit salad in my opinion. I hear folks say it isn’t as easy this or that software is, maybe not, but that software does one thing not 30 things that can be done in one somewhat jumbled box.

I love the suggestion above, watch all the tutorial videos try each feature with test projects, then you will have a more well rounded understanding of the program.

HP Win 11 12 gig ram, Mac mini Sonoma with 16 gig of ram, BiaB 2025, Realband, Reaper 7, Harrison Mixbus 9 32c , Melodyne 5 editor, Presonus Audiobox 1818VSL, Presonus control app.