|
Log in to post
|
Print Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,644
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,644 |
I thought I'd start a thread here with what I hope are constructive thoughts on the manuals, and ideas on how to make them easier to read and understand.
I'd earlier said in a thread started by malevans that I thought the manual was "cluttered", so I thought I should expand on that. Someone also mentioned the Reaper manual as quite a good example, though there are several others. Reaper, BTW, have a footnote on each page with a link to LULU.com who are one of several organisations that offer printed manuals on demand.
Some of that "clutter" is due to probable documentation conventions, which could be made more concise by declaring those conventions somewhere, possibly right near the start of the manual. For example the convention used for buttons: [Style] if explicitly defined in the conventions as a button, would negate the need within the body text to say "using the [Style] button". Icons are good, though can be confusing when there are multiple GUI styles available, e.g., the monochrome or coloured icons styles.
Similarly predefine font meanings. Generally, the fewer fonts the better, though in manuals for software, "fewer" is usually quite hard to achieve.
Similarly sequences of actions. I personally tend to use, e.g., File->Load_Style_Special->"filename"->[OK] to describe a sequence. I note that the | symbol is used in some places, which is OK (though for me | means "or"). This would reduce the desire/need to use verbal descriptions.
A common problem in the manuals for many applications is that a section describing something, e.g., perhaps the MIDI Settings, without telling the user, right at that point, how to get to that something. Incidentally, I picked that from the index, expecting to see the instructions for setting up a MIDI device.
During a main explanation, focus upon a "preferred" way to do something, offering "other ways to do this" as a separate item. Then each of the sequences can be described completely in and of itself.
Hierarchically numbering every header helps navigation, and also helps suggestions or error-reports to focus closely to the correct location. In my specifications, where I need to incorporate similar changes, I usually number every paragraph, though most word-processors seem appallingly bad at doing that properly. A fall-back I've used is to number every line on every page, which is something with which most word-processors seem more adept. "Changed" indicators are often useful if the tools support them. You almost certainly already do that internally; it can be less useful in a published document, as it add clutter.
White-space, including indenting, helps quick navigation by eye and usually makes the document look nicer. On a .pdf document, white-space costs nothing. Printed it can, but better clarity can often reduce the number of pages needed. It's worth looking at the keyboard shortcuts section and considering how an additional line before each sub-header and indenting the keys from that header would make it easier to use. At present, it isn't easy to pick out the subheadings from the keys. It's worth noting that many publishers consider the white-space to be the most important part of a document, yet we ordinary folk tend to forget it, particularly when close to a particular text. It can pay sometimes, just to hold a page at arms-length and look at it.
It's surprising how much the choice of font affects the appearance of a document. Some publishers are quite obsessive about fonts. I can see why. I take some care with them, but I'm neither obsessive, nor really a publisher.
Good indices are a Godsend, but are also darned hard work to do well. The best indices are defined manually by the authors, based upon good keywords by which people will want to look for things, but that's a huge task which most of us baulk at. Sometimes what's important is to exclude things that are not so helpful. BiaB's index is not actually bad, though it could be better.
I think a separate sub-section just for the chord-entry shortcuts might be worthwhile.
In quite a few documents, I despair at the standard of grammar and punctuation. I have to say that I haven't noticed any real howlers, no "xxx was charged with murder in the court today".
The following may well not be feasible with BiaB now, and is much more software design than manual. Some software has a philosophy: "Everything that you can do with any object will be found in a right-click menu on that object".
I think I've written more than enough for now.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful. AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11 BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software. Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 110
Apprentice
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 110 |
Very Well said GS. I concur. I have, in the past, taken content out of the pdf into Word to reformat for precisely the reasons you outline here.
the manual is large and it is superb to have it in two file formats. I Often search the file for info I am after.
How do you feel about a collaborative community project to reformat the Manual? Assuming we obtain PGM consultative support for the project. And use of IP approval. Use something like GitHub for version control
RrR
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,644
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,644 |
How do you feel about a collaborative community project to reformat the Manual? Assuming we obtain PGM consultative support for the project. And use of IP approval. Use something like GitHub for version control
RrR It's certainly something I would be prepared to keep in mind. I think there's a good change PGM may be amenable to the idea as, it seems to me, they must know the manual has been less than perfect for some time, but I suspect they also well understand that it'll likely be a huge task. If they were amenable, then some dialogue to firm up ideas like mine above, though not necessarily actually mine above ... I'm sure others have comparable thoughts ... then we could establish a convention and potentially have many people working towards the same goal. I just thought to look if there are other language versions. There appears not to be. That's a relief for now, but offers perhaps both a challenge and an opportunity for the future.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful. AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11 BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software. Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891
Veteran
|
Veteran
Joined: Jun 2012
Posts: 3,891 |
How do you feel about a collaborative community project to reformat the Manual? Assuming we obtain PGM consultative support for the project. And use of IP approval. Use something like GitHub for version control It could possibly work if you had enough people who were passionate and capable enough. They would have to put in a ton of work. And even if they succeeded would need to reconvene every year to cover new and changed features. In my life in tech I have seen many attempts at a project like this but not many successes. And even the successes were never sustained for long. My opinion is this effort has to come from those who have a vested interest, namely, PGM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,644
Veteran
|
OP
Veteran
Joined: Jan 2015
Posts: 2,644 |
My opinion is this effort has to come from those who have a vested interest, namely, PGM. Indeed. My reason for posting was to share some ideas that may help and perhaps to encourage PGM, rather than to suggest a user-authored manual. Also, if I'm honest, the brutal and vindictive way I was treated by my last employer has left me struggling with some mental issues, particularly around focus on a task. I used to be bullet proof unstoppable. Now I struggle at least some of the time most days.
Jazz relative beginner, starting at a much older age than was helpful. AVL:MXE Linux; Windows 11 BIAB2026 Audiophile, a bunch of other software. Kawai MP6, Ui24R, Focusrite Saffire Pro40 and Scarletts .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Band-in-a-Box Wishlist
|
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 110
Apprentice
|
Apprentice
Joined: Dec 2018
Posts: 110 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ask sales and support questions about Band-in-a-Box using natural language.
ChatPG's knowledge base includes the full Band-in-a-Box User Manual and sales information from the website.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Update to Build 10 of RealBand® 2026 for Windows®!
If you're already using RealBand 2026 for Windows, download build 10 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac® users: Build 904 now available!
If you're already using Band-in-a-Box® 2025 for Mac®, make sure to grab the latest update! Build 904 is now available for download and includes the newest additions and enhancements from our team.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® users: Build 1237 is now available!
Already a Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows user? Stay up to date and download the build 1237 to get all the latest additions and enhancements.
PowerTracks Pro 2026 for Windows is Here!
PowerTracks 2026 is here—bringing powerful new enhancements designed to make your production workflow faster, smoother, and more intuitive than ever.
The enhanced Mixer now shows Track Type and Instrument icons for instant track recognition, while a new grid option simplifies editing views. Non-floating windows adopt a modern title bar style, replacing the legacy blue bar.
The Master Volume is now applied at the end of the audio chain for consistent levels and full-signal master effects.
Tablature now includes a “Save bends when saving XML” option for improved compatibility with PG Music tools. Plus, you can instantly match all track heights with a simple Ctrl-release after resizing, and Add2 chords from MGU/SGU files are now fully supported... and more!
Get started today—first-time packages start at just $49.
Already using PowerTracks Pro Audio? Upgrade for as little as $29 and enjoy the latest improvements!
Order now!
Band-in-a-Box 2026 for Windows Special Offers End Tomorrow (January 15th, 2026) at 11:59 PM PST!
Time really is running out! Save up to 50% on Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® upgrades and receive a FREE Bonus PAK—only when you order by 11:59 PM PST on Thursday, January 15, 2026!
We've added many major new features and new content in a redesigned Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®!
Version 2026 introduces a modernized GUI redesign across the program, with updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, and a new Dark Mode option. There’s also a new side toolbar for quicker access to commonly used windows, and the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, making it easier to customize your workspace.
Another exciting new addition is the new AI-Notes feature, which can transcribe polyphonic audio into MIDI. You can view the results in notation or play them back as MIDI, and choose whether to process an entire track or focus on specific parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
Upgrade your Band-in-a-Box for Windows to save up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade packages!
Plus, when you order your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 upgrade during our special, you'll receive a Free Bonus PAK of exciting new add-ons.
If you need any help deciding which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We are here to help!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® Special Offers Extended Until January 15, 2026!
Good news! You still have time to upgrade to the latest version of Band-in-a-Box® for Windows® and save. Our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® special now runs through January 15, 2025!
We've packed Band-in-a-Box® 2026 with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can process an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, XPro Styles PAK 10, Xtra Styles PAK 21, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PST on January 15th, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Windows® today! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all the purchase options available.
Happy New Year!
Thank you for being part of the Band-in-a-Box® community.
Wishing you and yours a very happy 2026—Happy New Year from all of us at PG Music!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forums57
Topics86,083
Posts799,875
Members40,031
| |
Most Online44,367 Mar 4th, 2026
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|