Take something simple as an example. A 1,4,5 in the key of A. So why can you go to the two-chord of A which is B minor and play B major to E major and have it sound right?
Is this because we have listened to this change many times before or is there a more technical answer?
Is it because E major is the 4 chord of the B major scale?
Billy
Last edited by Planobilly; 11/28/2109:10 AM.
“Amazing! I’ll be working with Jaco Pastorius, Charlie Parker, Art Tatum, and Buddy Rich, and you’re telling me it’s not that great of a gig? “Well…” Saint Peter, hesitated, “God’s got this girlfriend who thinks she can sing…”
Yes, B -> E sounds good, even if you're in the key of A major.
As you suggest, it's the power of the V -> I progression. If you have any doubts, play it as B7 -> E, and see if your ears hear it as functionally the same. If so, it's a V -> I progression in action.
Depending on context, you'll probably just hear it as a temporary modulation.
Adding to David's excellent explanation the B can also be called as a passing chord. A passing chord is any chord(s) that connects two diatonic chords:
"Passing chords may be consonant or dissonant and may include flat fifth substitution, scalewise substitution, dominant minor substitution, approach chords, and bass-line-directed substitution"
Well, all of that is a mouth full and could be something to consider as a composer. Less so as a player unless you are sight-reading the music or have listened to something enough to play it note for note.
They also go on to say A diatonic passing chord may be inserted into a pre-existing progression that moves by a major or minor third in order to create more movement.
So...does it have to move by a major or minor third?
Sometimes I find Wikipedia lacking in their explanations.
Billy
“Amazing! I’ll be working with Jaco Pastorius, Charlie Parker, Art Tatum, and Buddy Rich, and you’re telling me it’s not that great of a gig? “Well…” Saint Peter, hesitated, “God’s got this girlfriend who thinks she can sing…”
Yes, B -> E sounds good, even if you're in the key of A major.
As you suggest, it's the power of the V -> I progression. If you have any doubts, play it as B7 -> E, and see if your ears hear it as functionally the same. If so, it's a V -> I progression in action.
Depending on context, you'll probably just hear it as a temporary modulation.
Hi David,
The term "temporary modulation" was an idea I never considered. Thanks for a new bit of info. And, Yes B or B7 sounded about the same or had the same function.
Billy
“Amazing! I’ll be working with Jaco Pastorius, Charlie Parker, Art Tatum, and Buddy Rich, and you’re telling me it’s not that great of a gig? “Well…” Saint Peter, hesitated, “God’s got this girlfriend who thinks she can sing…”
Billy, you don't really have to know all the theory as long as it sounds good. You are right if you were composing it may help to know what you could do before you were playing it for example. But people with good ears kind of figure this stuff out on the fly in a manner of speaking.
My wife asked if I had seen the dog bowl. I told her I didn't even know he could.
yes, for sure. The theory is not a necessary thing. Even the names of chords
I could play the Asus4 chord a long time before I knew what it was called.
If you play guitar very long, sooner to later you are going to put your little finger down on the high E string on the 3rd fret. Same with the A chord.
In fact the other day I was writing in the chords in BIAB to an original of mine and I had to stop and figure what the chord names were...lol
In fact, my original question came from listening to the way things sound from playing them, not some theoretical basis.
I think the coffee pot is still hot. We could talk about this in person you know!
Billy
“Amazing! I’ll be working with Jaco Pastorius, Charlie Parker, Art Tatum, and Buddy Rich, and you’re telling me it’s not that great of a gig? “Well…” Saint Peter, hesitated, “God’s got this girlfriend who thinks she can sing…”
Billy, thank you for raising this question as it prompted picking up he guitar and noodling. Ended up with a new bridge or prechorus section, with yes a familiar passing sequence: A —> Bsus4/A —> D. Which then really wants to resolve to A which I will keep for awhile and build something out of that.
Wouldn’t have gone with this progression without the prompt of your post. Thank you.
Theory is useful to analyze a song to reverse engineer how/why it might have been written.
Most great songwriters do NOT think about theory when composing a song.
Why does a particular progression sound right even when it violates the "rules"? The reason is often contextual.
I believe in the case you mentioned here it's because the only thing you are changing is the chord quality from dominant to major. So the intervallic structure is still there.
In pop music it's usually pretty easy to break the rules and have it sound fine. More importantly, it's pretty obvious to the ear if something doesn't sound right. If you were doing something more complex harmonically it would be more difficult.
Personally, I would learn enough theory to write the kind of music you want to write. Far too many people get so caught up in the theory. Theory is the least important part of music. Making a unique emotional expression is at it's core.
I understand that most likely everyone on this thread is doing something other than jazz.
But just to make a point that IS applicable to all music...
Jazz theory is complex. Most jazz players make that a priority.
However, when you go back and look at all the great players. Nearly all of them did not make theory the top focus. In fact, many of them picked up licks, learning by trial and error, gradually getting there ear better.
Ear training is much, much more important than theory is for song writers.
The thought that music created by people who have no understanding of music theory is somehow inherently better and that being uneducated is a superior state of affairs is the purview of the uneducated. And by the way, ear training is a typical part of classical training.
The idea that while playing popular music live no thought is given to music theory is simply not accurate. Did you not ever ask what the key was? Was it important to know the Key? Music theory is as much about communication as anything.
David Cuny knew exactly what I was asking about and verified what I was thinking was accurate.
I really did not even ask for the real answer to the question because that lies in the physics of sound and the relationship of the frequencies involved and is generally out of the scope of musical discussions.
And finally, as a result of asking a "theoretical question", one of our guitar players used the idea to develop something he was looking for.
Billy
Last edited by Planobilly; 01/10/2206:42 PM.
“Amazing! I’ll be working with Jaco Pastorius, Charlie Parker, Art Tatum, and Buddy Rich, and you’re telling me it’s not that great of a gig? “Well…” Saint Peter, hesitated, “God’s got this girlfriend who thinks she can sing…”
The thought that music created by people who have no understanding of music theory is somehow inherently better and that being uneducated is a superior state of affairs is the purview of the uneducated. And by the way, ear training is a typical part of classical training.
The idea that while playing popular music live no thought is given to music theory is simply not accurate. Did you not ever ask what the key was? Was it important to know the Key? Music theory is as much about communication as anything. Billy
I never ever said anything about the music being inherently better if created by someone with no understanding of music theory. What I said is that there is often too much focus put on theory. And that most of the great songwriters rely on the ear much more than on theory. That is something easily verified by listening to interviews of various song writers.
And I specifically stated that my comments were coming from a particular style of music: jazz. However, I think it's probably even more true with simpler forms of music like rock, pop, and country. Certainly in less harmonically complex styles of music it's easier to say what you want to say without knowing a lot of theory.
I disagree that music theory is about communication. Theory is tantamount to grammar for writing. It is a way to define the structure.
Your comment saying that my comment is inaccurate is a generalization. And one that is inaccurate. I do know there are people that rely solely on their ear, without knowing harmony. This is most certainly doable. It may be outside your realm of possibility, but that doesn't mean that there aren't people that do it.
As other have said, what you are talking about is called dominant motion. It's summarised in a diagram usually called the "Cycle of Fifths" or the "Cycle of Fourths." It's exactly the same diagram and just depends on if you go anti-clockwise or clockwise around it.
I prefer to think in clockwise motion, so for me it's a Cycle of Fourths (see the image below).
The dominant of any chord is the one immediately before it on the diagram.
For example...
The dominant of an A or Am chord is E (or E7) The dominant of an C of Cm chord is G (or G7)
Some writers use this motion to create songs. For example, in "Fly Me To The Moon" in the key of A minor, the chord progression for the first part is...
Am | Dm | G7 | C | F | Bm7b5 | E7 | Am |
When you look at the chord letters only in relation to the the diagram below, you'll see what I mean by "thinking in clockwise motion".
Most great songwriters do NOT think about theory when composing a song.
This made me smile for 2 reasons.
The first is that I have had people say "I don't know anything about theory." And then they play parts that are absolutely theoretically correct. In those cases they actually DO know theory. They just don't KNOW that they know theory.
The second is best served by analogy. When you learn a sport or a craft or a trade, you learn "things". You use those "things" so much they become second nature. A carpenter, when checking for square, measures one side at 3 feet, the other side at 4, and measures between those 2 marks, and if they come out to 5, the frame is square. He doesn't stop to think "Okay I will apply the Pythagorean Theory here." He just does it because by rote he knows that's the right thing to do. Or if you are playing football and you see that the offensive lineman block briefly and then let the rush get through. That means screen pass. But you don't stop and think "Ah. He blocked me for a 3 count and then let me go. It's a screen pass." You just react and "do". Most writers know theory whether they know it or not. Do you think John Petrucci needed Berklee to learn how to play as well as he does? Would he not have become what he is by practicing on his own? He learned MUSIC at Berklee. WHAT to play. HOW to practice.
As to Billy's OP, in any scale, (use C so they are all white keys) if you just move up one triad at a time, 2, 3, and 6 will always be minor chords. CM, Dm, Em, FM, GM, Am, B is a "word they will censor that means out of wedlock" chord that can be looked at as a G7 with no root, a sus, a dim... (all depending on what you consider to be the root note) and back to CM. Every major scale is exactly that. Just like steps in a major scale are WWHWWWH where W = whole and H = half. Those steps never change in a major scale.
Noel, I have never see the Cycle of 5ths where the 5ths go counterclockwise and the 4ths go clockwise. In fact, this clock hangs in my studio.
Maybe it's a southern hemisphere thing like how your water drains in the opposite direction.
I have known several drummers who must have had the same clock as you Dan...lol
Billy
“Amazing! I’ll be working with Jaco Pastorius, Charlie Parker, Art Tatum, and Buddy Rich, and you’re telling me it’s not that great of a gig? “Well…” Saint Peter, hesitated, “God’s got this girlfriend who thinks she can sing…”
Noel, I have never see the Cycle of 5ths where the 5ths go counterclockwise and the 4ths go clockwise. In fact, this clock hangs in my studio.
Maybe it's a southern hemisphere thing like how your water drains in the opposite direction.
Love it!
Actually, it's all very confusing from a musical perspective...
Consider A to D to G to C....
If I think about that as "A going down to D going down to G going down to C," then I have a cycle of 5ths.
On the other hand, if I think of the same motion as as "A going up to D going up to G going up to C," then I have a cycle of 4ths.
So your clock and the image I posted are both simultaneously Cycle of 4ths and Cycle of 5ths (just to make matters more confusing).
I just like to think clockwise! That's how the dominant motion seems to work best in my head. It probably is a southern hemisphere thing. As you say, the musical version of the Coriolis effect.
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 Mac Special Offers Extended Until May 31st!
Good news- we've extended our Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® special offers until May 31, 2026!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 is packed with major new features, enhancements, and an incredible lineup of new content! The program now sports a sleek, modern GUI redesign across the entire interface, including updated toolbars, refreshed windows, smoother workflows, a new dark mode option, and more. The brand-new side toolbar provides quicker access to key windows, while the new Multi-View feature lets you arrange multiple windows as layered panels without overlap, creating a flexible, clutter-free workspace. We have an amazing new “AI-Notes” feature. This transcribes polyphonic audio into MIDI so you can view it in notation or play it back as MIDI. You can transcribe an entire track (all pitched instruments and drums) or focus on individual parts like drums, bass, guitars/piano, or vocals. There's an amazing collection of new content too, including 202 RealTracks, new RealStyles, MIDI SuperTracks, Instrumental Studies, “Songs with Vocals” Artist Performance Sets, Playable RealTracks Set 5, two RealDrums Stems sets, and much more!
There are over 100 new features in Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®.
When you order purchase Band-in-a-Box® 2026 before 11:59 PM PDT on May 31st, you'll also receive a Free Bonus PAK packed with exciting new add-ons.
Check out the Band-in-a-Box® for Mac packages page to find the best package for you.
Today's the Last Day of the Band-in-a-Box 2026® for Mac Special!
Order before 11:59pm PDT today (May 15, 2026) to save up to 50% off your Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® upgrade and receive a FREE Bonus PAK loaded with great new Add-ons to use with this new version!
Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac - Special Offers End at 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th, 2026!
Order before 11:59pm PDT on Friday, May 15th and SAVE up to 50% on most Band-in-a-Box® version 2026 for Mac Upgrade packages... and that's not all! With your version 2026 for Mac purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons FREE! Upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks... that's 222 NEW RealTracks available with version Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac!
Upgrade to Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac® today for as little as $49! Check out the Band-in-a-Box® packages page for all available purchase options.
Learn more about the Free Bonus PAK and 49-PAK here.
If you have any questions about which package is the best option for you, just let us know. We're here to help!
202 New RealTracks Released with Band-in-a-Box 2026!
With Band-in-a-Box® 2026, we've released 202 incredible new RealTracks (in sets 468-488) in a variety of genres—featuring your most requested styles!
Jazz, Funk & World (Sets 468-475):
Our new jazz, funk & blues RealTracks include a groovin’ collection of RealTracks and RealDrums! These include more requested “soul jazz” RealTracks featuring artists Neil Swainson (bass), Charles Treadway (organ), Brent Mason (guitar), and Wes Little (drums). There are new “smooth jazz” styles (4), which include a RealTracks first: muted trumpet, as well as slick new smooth jazz brushes options for drums. Blues lovers will be thrilled—there are more “classic acoustic blues” styles, including guitar (5), bass (4), and drums (10) with blues master Colin Linden, featuring understated and tasty background acoustic soloing, plus brushes drums and acoustic bass. There are also new electric blues RealTracks, including electric blues with PG favorite Johnny Hiland (3) and soulful electric slide guitar from Colin Linden (4). If you love funk & gospel, there are great new options this year, including gospel organ (3) from Charles Treadway, as well as new funk, tango, and rock ’n’ roll drums (3) and bass (1). And for big, bold arrangements, we have uptempo soul horns (4) featuring a three-part hip horn section with options for a full mix or stems of each individual horn — plus an accompanying rhythm section (4) of drums, bass, guitar, and electric piano!
Rock & Pop (Sets 476–482):
Our new rock & pop RealTracks bring a powerful mix of requested favorites, fresh genres, and modern chart-inspired styles! We have more of our popular “Producer Layered Acoustic Guitars (15)” featuring Band-in-a-Box favorite Brent Mason. We’ve continued our much-requested disco styles (10), and added new Celtic guitar (5) with a more basic, accessible approach than our previous Drop-D or DADGAD offerings. There are also highly requested yacht rock styles (17), inspired by the smooth, polished soft-rock sound of the late ’70s and early ’80s — laid-back grooves, silky electric pianos, warm textures, elegant harmonic movement, and pristine production aesthetics. Fans of heavier styles will love our new glam metal (13), capturing the flashy, high-energy sound of ’80s arena-ready guitar rock. We also have a set of rootsy modern-folk rock (18), with a warm, organic sound combining contemporary folk textures and driving acoustic strumming. And we’ve added lots of new modern pop styles (16) — the kinds of sounds you’re hearing on the radio today, featuring exciting new drums, synths, and cutting-edge RealTracks arrangements.
Country, & Americana (Sets 483–488):
Our new country & Americana RealTracks deliver a rich collection of acoustic, electric, and roots-inspired styles! We have new country pop (9) with legendary guitarist Brent Mason. There is also a potpourri (14) of bouzouki, guitars, banjo, and more, perfect for adding texture and character to contemporary acoustic arrangements. We’ve added funky country guitar (5) with PG favorite Brent Mason, along with classic pedal steel styles (5) featuring steel great Doug Jernigan. There are more country songwriter styles (8) that provide intimate, rootsy foundations for storytelling and modern Americana writing. Finally, we have “background soloing” acoustic guitar (12) with Brent Mason — simpler, but still very tasty acoustic lines designed to sit beautifully behind vocals or act as a subtle standalone solo part.
And, if you are looking for more, the 2026 49-PAK (for $49) includes an impressive collection of 20 bonus RealTracks, featuring exciting and inspiring additions to add to your RealTracks library. You'll get new country-rhythm guitar styles from PG Music favorites Johnny Hiland and Brent Mason, along with modern-pop grooves that capture today’s radio-ready sound! There are also new indie-folk styles with guitar, bass, 6-string bass used as a high-chording instrument, acoustic guitar, and banjo. Plus, dedicated "cymbal fills" RealDrums provide an added layer that work very well with low-key folky styles with other percussion.
The 2026 49-PAK is loaded with other great new add-ons as well. Learn more about the 2026 49-PAK!
2026 Free Bonus PAK & 49-PAK for Band-in-a-Box® 2026 for Mac®!
With your version 2026 for Mac Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, Audiophile Edition or PlusPAK purchase, we'll include a Bonus PAK full of great new Add-ons for FREE! Or upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for only $49 to receive even more NEW Add-ons including 20 additional RealTracks!
These PAKs are loaded with additional add-ons to supercharge your Band-in-a-Box®!
This Free Bonus PAK includes:
The 2026 RealCombos Booster PAK:
-For Pro customers, this includes 27 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For MegaPAK customers, this includes 25 new RealTracks and 23 new RealStyles.
-For UltraPAK customers, this includes 12 new RealStyles.
MIDI Styles Set 92: Look Ma! More MIDI 15: Latin Jazz
MIDI SuperTracks Set 46: Piano & Organ
Instrumental Studies Set 24: Groovin' Blues Soloing
Artist Performance Set 19: Songs with Vocals 9
Playable RealTracks Set 5
RealDrums Stems Set 9: Cool Brushes
SynthMaster Sounds Set 1 (with audio demos)
iOS Android Band-in-a-Box® App
Looking for more great add-ons, then upgrade to the 2026 49-PAK for just $49 and you'll get:
20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums with 20 RealStyle.
FLAC Files (lossless audio files) for the 20 Bonus Unreleased RealTracks and RealDrums
MIDI Styles Set 93: Look Ma! More MIDI 16: SynthMaster
MIDI SuperTracks Set 47: More SynthMaster
Instrumental Studies 25 - Soul Jazz Guitar Soloing
Artist Performance Set 20: Songs with Vocals 10
RealDrums Stems Set 10: Groovin' Sticks
SynthMaster Sounds & Styles Set 2 (sounds & styles with audio demos)
XPro & Xtra Styles PAK Sets On Sale Now - Until May 15, 2026!
All of our XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAKs are on sale until May 15th, 2026!
It's the perfect time to expand your Band-in-a-Box® style library with XPro and Xtra Styles PAKs. These additional styles for Band-in-a-Box® offer a wide range of genres designed to fit seamlessly into your projects. Each style is professionally arranged and mixed, helping enhance your songs while saving you time.
What are XPro Styles and Xtra Styles PAKs?
XPro Styles PAKs are styles that work with any version (Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition) of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). XPro Styles PAKS 1-10 includes 1,000 styles!
Xtra Styles PAKs are styles that work with the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box® 2025 (or higher). Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 includes 3,700 styles (and 35 MIDI styles)!
The XPro & Xtra Styles PAKs are not included in any Band-in-a-Box® package.
The XPro Styles PAKs 1-10 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the XPro Styles PAK Bundle for only $149 (reg. $299)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
The Xtra Styles PAKs 1-21 are available for only $29 ea (reg. $49 ea), or get them all in the Xtra Styles PAK Bundle for only $199 (reg. $349)! Listen to demos and order now! For Mac or for Windows.
Note: XPro Styles PAKs require Band-in-a-Box® 2025 or higher and are compatible with ANY package, including the Pro, MegaPAK, UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, and Audiophile Edition.
The Xtra Styles require the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition of Band-in-a-Box®. (Xtra Styles PAK 19 requires the 2025 or higher UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition. They will not work with the Pro or MegaPAK version as they require the RealTracks included in the UltraPAK, UltraPAK+, or Audiophile Edition.
Supercharge your Band-in-a-Box today with XPro Styles PAKs and Xtra Styles PAK Sets!
One of our representatives will be happy to help you over the phone. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday, and 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST Saturday. We are closed Sunday. You can also send us your questions via email.
One of our representatives will be happy to help you on our Live Chat or by email. Our hours of operation are from
6:00AM to 6:00PM PST (GMT -8) Monday thru Friday; 8:00AM to 4:00PM PST (GMT -8) Saturday; Closed Sunday.
That's how the dominant motion seems to work best in my head. It probably is a southern hemisphere thing. As you say, the musical version of the Coriolis effect.
Dansk
Deutsch - Windows
Español
Français - Windows
Italiano - Windows
Nederlands
Polski
Português
Svenskt
русский
Japanese
Simplified Chinese
Traditional Chinese
Korean