ALL.
thanks to those users so far for supporting this wish.
as i've worked in the past in a previous life in software development supporting a large user base , i would respectfully ask for users to continue to post their support for this wish in this thread…..
cos typically software development teams will often implement new features that are constantly requested/supported by lots of users.
please let me say my motivation is not ego (if someone might be thinking same..)..but a sincere reason…
particularly one major reason being that i suspect , over time, PG products will evolve to include more and more instruments//RTs//RDs//Perc etc etc ie a full blown set of orchestral instruments and instruments in many different music genres.
thus there are obvious technical ramifications as the instrument library grows over time.
for those 'techs' amongst us heres the specs for programming in flac….
(ymmv i hope i have referenced the correct specs as ive never programmed for FLAC.)
https://xiph.org/flac/format.htmli was pondering also, and only a pg tech can answer this next point….viz
is it easier for a programmer to implement FLAC support rather than code for WAV ?
cos i just dont know.
TO PG.. I DO REALISE from my tech background its a tough 'ask'...particularly as you issue your products in many different languages. ..and also cover 2 major platforms.
let me add my only motivation is to see pg prosper and continue to offer these unique products to help us musos create songs.
once again thanks to all that have supported this thread so far, and if you agree with me that this is an important topic/wish please continue to post your support in this thread.
happiness to all and happy song creation.
om