Byron.
(good points.)
of course , thats a given…but i was taking a broader bb future view.
anyhoo is there any accompaniement software that DOES do many added features that pg users have wanted in bb , myself included ?
heres my view (and i have no inner pg knowledge..i'm just a user like your goodself.)..
1..if the whole coding up music software accompaniement apps was easy/trivial , more companies would be doing it ? crikey i would have a bash myself …lol..thus…
2..i suspect the reason why certain features are missing in bb, is, to implement those features in code is not trivial and/or problematic. cos we used to face the same in industry..ie some features users had been asking for simply couldnt be done or causes problems in another part of the app.
3..i often wonder why some big name daws like 'logic' havent included bb features.
i suspect because they have realised the tech challenges in doing so. also they have no desire to, every year, supply more and more rt//rd libraries.
I'm sure PG devs DO KNOW that there is user frustration re certain features/needs..as we used to know our user base in industry..i'm just suggesting there are cogent reasons at the tech level why those needs havent been met.
maybe it might be usefull if PG gave feedback to users re how possible or not it is to meet certain needs/requests ?
happiness
om
Last edited by justanoldmuso; 09/06/22 09:04 AM.