Charlie, I completely disagree with your opinions.

1)Settings at the bar for Util tracks will save a lot of time, especially for sketching out stuff. ACW is great, but it is for fine editing. And will take ten times slower to do same in Settings at the bar. And if you change number of bars / insert bars, good luck re-volume everything. They are different features, and I hope that both will be available in future.

2)There is absolutely no reason for Utility tracks not to gain full functions of legacy tracks. Especially Shots, Holds, Rests. Offering existing "workarounds" for these is no go, as they are absurd.


A Big +1! to OP post.

Utility tracks have been evolving, but not there yet. To make full use, they have to match capabilities of legacy tracks, there is no doubt about it. I hope that this is something in the books for 2023. Or at least a good step forward, either Settings at the Bar or Shots, Rests, Holds and Pushes. Hopefully both smile

P.S. Bass Thumper, I don't like "workarounds" when it involves core functions, but I thought you should know that you can use ACW to node control volumes of instruments for now for Utility tracks. Not ideal solution compared to quick and easy "Settings at the bar", but at least doable. Actually, if proper automation is programmed to ACW in the future, I would prefer that instead of Bar Settings. But that is another discussion. There is a benefit to ACW as you can adjust volumes precisely. If you are not aware of the method, see attached.

I am much more worried about Shots, Holds and Rests for Utility tracks. I hope it is being considered as the workaround for these is very painful and for the sake of sanity, I will not even mention it here smile

Attached Files (Click to download or enlarge) (Only available when you are logged in)
acw.jpg (251.93 KB, 133 downloads)
Last edited by Rustyspoon#; 10/17/22 12:37 PM.